| 
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				12-23-2009, 11:46 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			| Executive Editor   
					Join Date: Aug 2006 
						Posts: 29,160
					      |  | 
				
			 
 
	Quote:
	 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by ptyork  Great unboxing, Jason! I thought long and hard about whether to get a real DSLR or one of these micro four-thirds cameras, and I ended up going the safe route with the 7D. | I personally wouldn't give up my DSLR for anything; my D300 still rocks the socks off the GF1 in low-light with my f/2.8 lens. But if you're a camera nut like me, the GF1 makes for a truly great second camera. And I think for many people, this form-factor of camera is a great choice instead of an intro-level DSLR (Canon Rebel, Nikon D3000, etc.). I think 2010 will be the year we see a response from Canon and Nikon to this...
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by ptyork  So the obvious next contest challenge is to come up with the best acronym for this type of camera. So far we've got DILC and EVIL (electronic viewfinder interchangeable lens--hmm, not really applicable here since there's no electronic viewfinder, per se). |  Maybe m4/3.   |  
          |  |  |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				12-24-2009, 03:19 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			| Sage 
					Join Date: Jul 2005 
						Posts: 639
					      |  | 
				
			 
 
	Quote:
	 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Jason Dunn  Maybe m4/3.   | Yeah, but that doesn't account for this gremlin:
http://gizmodo.com/5431519/samsung-n...-camera-format 
Or for any future ones using other sensors and lens mounts. Definitely needs a category designation all its own.
 
	Quote: 
	
		| YouTube doesn't give us that option on the embeddable player |  Actually there's no hack involved. Simply add the allowfullscreen parameter and set it to "true". Need to add it both as an attribute of the embed tag AND as a param tag within the object tag. It's now part of the default embed code coming from YouTube. |  
          |  |  |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				12-24-2009, 06:17 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			| Executive Editor   
					Join Date: Aug 2006 
						Posts: 29,160
					      |  | 
				
			 
 
	Quote:
	 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by ptyork  Actually there's no hack involved. Simply add the allowfullscreen parameter and set it to "true". Need to add it both as an attribute of the embed tag AND as a param tag within the object tag. It's now part of the default embed code coming from YouTube. | Right you are! Turns out though that TinyMCE, the toolbar control we use in our CMS, doesn't seem to like that part of the code, and keeps breaking it. There's no fix other than for us to manually use the YouTube embed code.    What we need is for TinyMCE to fix the darn bugs... |  
          |  |  |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				12-24-2009, 05:00 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			| Contributing Editor Emeritus   
					Join Date: Jun 2003 
						Posts: 1,350
					      |  | 
				
			 Nice camera, my friend. Of course, I saw some images already on your blog, and it seems you're having a ball with it. I'm  still undecided if I go for the GF1 (or 2 by that time...), or the Olympus E-P2. It's a decision between AF speed and sensor stabilization / usability of my existing four thirds lenses. One thing I'm sure of: that lens you have is awfully nice!
 
 Oh, and in the Four Thirds forums the notion of this type of camera (DSLR without the mirror box needed for the optical viewfinder) went by the name EVIL (Electronic Viewfinder Interchangable Lenses). :-)
 
				__________________enjoy being here while getting there
 			 Last edited by marlof; 12-24-2009 at 05:03 PM..
 |  
          |  |  |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				12-24-2009, 08:52 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			| Executive Editor   
					Join Date: Aug 2006 
						Posts: 29,160
					      |  | 
				
			 
 
	Quote:
	 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by marlof  I'm  still undecided if I go for the GF1 (or 2 by that time...), or the Olympus E-P2. It's a decision between AF speed and sensor stabilization / usability of my existing four thirds lenses. One thing I'm sure of: that lens you have is awfully nice! | I figured with you being such an Olympus guy, it wouldn't be a hard decision, but I'm happy the Panasonic is tempting you. ;-) I initially was hesitant at not having the IS in the GF-1, but with the f/1.7 lens, it's not much of an issue. I still wish it had it mind you - I'll take every trick I can get to achieve sharper pictures!
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by marlof  Oh, and in the Four Thirds forums the notion of this type of camera (DSLR without the mirror box needed for the optical viewfinder) went by the name EVIL (Electronic Viewfinder Interchangable Lenses). :-) |  Hahahaha....."I'm using an EVIL camera". That just sounds so wrong. Guess it's better than DILC though.     |  
          |  |  |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				12-26-2009, 07:33 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			| Contributing Editor Emeritus   
					Join Date: Jun 2003 
						Posts: 1,350
					      |  | 
				
			 
 
	Quote:
	 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Jason Dunn  I figured with you being such an Olympus guy, it wouldn't be a hard decision, but I'm happy the Panasonic is tempting you. ;-) | I like my Olympus DSLRs, but mostly for the quality of their mid range lenses. I'm not a brand zealot, and my current small sensor camera is the Panasonic LX3, which I like a lot too. I think I'll wait for the announcement of the follow up to the GF1, and then decide. I'm not exactly in a rush. :-) 
				__________________enjoy being here while getting there
 |  
          |  |  |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				12-27-2009, 01:42 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			| Theorist   
					Join Date: Jun 2005 
						Posts: 270
					      |  | 
				 Need IS Your unboxing videos were great.  Nice job!   I love the camera, but I need image stabilization because of hand tremors.  This is made even more important due to the lack of an electronic viewfinder whose use stabilizes the camera somewhat against my forehead.   It's always something....
 
 Thanks, Jason.
 
				__________________Thanks!
 
 Peace,
 |  
          |  |  |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				12-28-2009, 07:52 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			| Executive Editor   
					Join Date: Aug 2006 
						Posts: 29,160
					      |  | 
				
			 
 
	Quote:
	 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by marlof  I think I'll wait for the announcement of the follow up to the GF1, and then decide. I'm not exactly in a rush. :-) | Well, there's always something better coming down the pipe - that's a given. Panasonic announces the GF-1 in September, and starting shipping in October I think, so it will be almost a year until we might see the GF-2, or possible longer. But if you're not in a rush, then you can wait for the GF-3, which I'm sure will be better than the GF-2.   |  
          |  |  |  |  |  |  |