Thoughts Media.com

 


Windows Phone Thoughts

Loading feed...

Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Apple Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > Thoughts Media Off Topic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 03-02-2004, 12:42 AM
Enderet
Thinker
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 407

The credits read....

"The the characters and events depicted in this photoplay are ficticious. Any similarity to actual persons, living or dead, is purely coincidential".


 
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 03-02-2004, 01:16 AM
David Prahl
Pontificator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,398

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enderet
The credits read....

"The the characters and events depicted in this photoplay are ficticious. Any similarity to actual persons, living or dead, is purely coincidential".


8O
I can't believe it!
__________________
The One Nerd Band
www.davidprahl.com
 
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 03-02-2004, 01:24 AM
Pat Logsdon
Magi
Pat Logsdon's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,186

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Prahl
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enderet
The credits read....

"The the characters and events depicted in this photoplay are ficticious. Any similarity to actual persons, living or dead, is purely coincidential".
8O
I can't believe it!
It's a legal thing. If that disclaimer wasn't there, some guy who looks like the guy who played Judas in that movie would sue the producers for slander and defamation of character. :roll:
__________________
redbatphotography.com
 
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 03-02-2004, 02:16 AM
David Prahl
Pontificator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,398

I understand (from a legal perspective). But to word it that way almost dismisses the entire Passion as a myth - a folktale.

Stick in a few nouns and it reads:
"The the character of Jesus Christ and his death depicted in this photoplay are ficticious."

Some people would call that blasphemous.
__________________
The One Nerd Band
www.davidprahl.com
 
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 03-02-2004, 02:21 AM
Kati Compton
5000+ Posts? I Should OWN This Site!
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,133

I suggest we stop discussing whether or not the events happened or not, and just stick to the movie itself. Thanks.
 
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 03-03-2004, 06:37 PM
karinatwork
Philosopher
karinatwork's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 489

Quote:
Originally Posted by PetiteFlower
One does not need to SEE or EXPERIENCE graphic violence in order to know it.
That's what I was trying to say earlier. I feel like I know the history, I've grown up with it, I have my own imagination to depict exactly what happened. I do NOT want to see it in every detail.
 
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 03-03-2004, 08:35 PM
Jimmy Dodd
Sage
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 713

Quote:
Originally Posted by karinatwork
Quote:
Originally Posted by PetiteFlower
One does not need to SEE or EXPERIENCE graphic violence in order to know it.
That's what I was trying to say earlier. I feel like I know the history, I've grown up with it, I have my own imagination to depict exactly what happened. I do NOT want to see it in every detail.
I think that's a valid point of view for a decision that everyone has to make for themselves.

I believe the film is an attempt to portray accurately just how much suffering was endured which is an important fact of Christianity, especially considering that it could have ended at a single word from Christ.
 
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 03-25-2004, 03:35 AM
sublime
Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 372

I'm a little late, but I just saw the movie today.

The movie itself was well done, but slipped up artistically at the end. I really loved the use of flashbacks in the movie. That one when Mary sees Christ fall made me cry because it was so perfectly beautiful. Where it slips up is near the end where the flashbacks begin to lose relevance to the situation at hand. Near the beginning of the movie, Christ or someone else would see something specific, then a memory would be triggered. This was not true of the Last Supper memories, and because of its lack of a trigger they felt a little incongruous. As for the actual triggered memories, they were flawless.

The last scene wasn't what I expected. It was aggressively suggestive, rather than subtly and effectively intimated as the rest of the movie. We see Christ stand up with a serious face and then storm off screen with a hole in his hand. Gibson was really trying to drive his point home then, and I think it lost its taste for that. If Gibson would have cut that tiny part out, but left the sinking in of the wrap, and perhaps had the people (I forget who comes into the grave) say that "he's gone," then fade to black, it would have been perfectly subtle, and I would have praised it greatly.

That scene of Satan screaming when Christ dies is too much. Blah, just tasteless. It was perfect when Christ steps on the serpent's head, because it is a direct allusion to Adam and Eve's expulsion from Eden. But that Wizard of Oz-ish "I'm melting! I'm melting!" bit should have been cut out.

Overall: 7.7/10
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright Thoughts Media Inc. 2009