| 
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				08-30-2005, 05:24 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			| 5000+ Posts? I Should OWN This Site!   
					Join Date: Aug 2006 
						Posts: 5,616
					      |  | 
				 Antivirus software - NAV vs NIS vs NSW? I'm getting a new system in the next wee bit of time and will likely need some sort of protection. I'm considering either Norton Antivirus, Norton Internet Security (NAV plus some Internet-related stuff) and Norton SystemWorks (NAV plus some non-Internet-related-but-still-useful stuff), but am still undecided which to go with.
 
 (I've tried other solutions in the past, and I really prefer Symantec's products over other companies' products.)
 
 Does anyone care to weigh in with their opinion of which of the above Symantec products they like/use/recommend the most?
 
				__________________iPhone 4! ☠☠☠ Mid-2010 15" MacBook Pro! ☠☠☠ Gateway LT2102h! ☠☠☠ Dell XPS M1210!
 |  
          |  |  |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				08-30-2005, 05:46 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			| Developer & Designer, News Editor Emeritus   
					Join Date: Aug 2006 
						Posts: 12,959
					      |  | 
				
			 If you're after basic AV protection, just stick with NAV. I find the other packages to be a tad bloated. However, NIS may be worth a look if you want an antivirus and firewall package by Symantec, but bear in mind there are free firewall solutions out there such as ZoneAlarm.
 |  
          |  |  |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				08-30-2005, 07:03 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			| 5000+ Posts? I Should OWN This Site!   
					Join Date: Aug 2006 
						Posts: 5,616
					      |  | 
				
			 Yeah, if I went with NIS, I'd likely only use the antivirus and firewall portions of it. I did some careful deliberating and decided against NSW. But I can get a free firewall and use it with NAV and get basically the same feature set (at least that I'd use) for less. And I found the bloat to be quite a pain in the posterior, at least on machines with 256MB or less RAM. So it looks like I'll likely go with NAV and a firewall, even though it'll be an extra icon in the tray.
 
 Thanks for your opinion!
 
 (btw, people, vote! ^ ^ )
 
				__________________iPhone 4! ☠☠☠ Mid-2010 15" MacBook Pro! ☠☠☠ Gateway LT2102h! ☠☠☠ Dell XPS M1210!
 |  
          |  |  |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				08-30-2005, 10:35 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			| Editor Emeritus   
					Join Date: Aug 2006 
						Posts: 15,171
					      |  | 
				
			 
 
	Quote:
	 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Darius Wey
					
				 If you're after basic AV protection, just stick with NAV. I find the other packages to be a tad bloated. | Agreed.  Myself, I find any firewall beyond the XP SP2 firewall to be too bloated, so I just NAV + Windows Firewall.
 
--janak |  
          |  |  |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				08-31-2005, 12:59 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			| Pupil 
					Join Date: Jul 2003 
						Posts: 49
					      |  | 
				
			 I agree with everyone else.  NAV is great, but for a firewall, either Windows Firewall or any Zone Alarm product is more than sufficient.
 |  
          |  |  |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				08-31-2005, 01:15 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			| Moderator   
					Join Date: Aug 2006 
						Posts: 6,878
					      |  | 
				
			 I use NAV and the Windows XP SP2 firewall as well. This combo has worked great so far!
 
				__________________"My eyes are rolling back in my head so far I can see my grey matter bubbling and frothing from reading this thread....bleh." JD
 
 |  
          |  |  |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				09-01-2005, 12:18 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			| Theorist 
					Join Date: May 2004 
						Posts: 266
					      |  | 
				
			 I personally use NIS, but I probably would go along with everyone else. With NIS, if there are any problems with it, uninstall/re-installs are a real pain. The last time I just ended up reformatting my hard drive and starting over. I have used Zone Alarm before, both paid and free, but the local computer shop in my area does not recommend it.
 |  
          |  |  |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				09-01-2005, 01:09 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			| Intellectual 
					Join Date: Feb 2002 
						Posts: 176
					      |  | 
				
			 Personally, I've found McAfee to be more stable - but that wasn't one of the options  :wink:
 |  
          |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
  
    |  |