Windows Phone Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!


Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Android Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > WINDOWS PHONE THOUGHTS > Windows Phone Articles & Resources

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-20-2005, 11:00 PM
Ekkie Tepsupornchai
Magi
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,386
Default Mobile Device Support in the Enterprise - Quite Frankly, There Is None...

http://www.infoworld.com/article/05...nnection_1.html

"I�ve tangled with complex CRM projects and delivered the goods. With steely determination, I�ve stared down the barrel of enterprise content management projects that have literally made grown men weep. Years after leaving a company, I have responded coolly to panicked calls from former colleagues, quoting seemingly long-forgotten command-line incantations like poetry to help them out of a jam. Tonight, though, I�m tangling with a system so critical that it�s practically an extension of myself. The problem is decidedly unglamorous -- my handheld (a Treo 650) is endlessly rebooting, and I�m off the communications grid. No phone and no PDA means no productivity."

Chad Dickerson, InfoWorld columnist, magnifies a truth that I think most IS departments don't want to face yet. Each new generation of mobile devices (handheld, mobile phone, mobile convergence device) becomes more and more like miniature PCs in our pockets and yet, most IS shops want to treat it like old cellphone technology (i.e. - "it just works"). Likely, it's going to require some high-ranking executive to go through what Chad Dickerson went through before proper attention is paid to mobile device support. Do you guys see the same level of nonchalance at your company?
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-20-2005, 11:17 PM
randyzon
Pupil
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 24
Default company antiquity

I work for an entity that must have real time information to efficiently perform. I purchased a ppc at my own expense when the HP iPaq 6315 came out last year. This is the future.

I had to purchase Netfront so I could access the internet email because Microsofts Internet Explorer (Lite version, I suppose) would not do the job. Shortly thereafter, IBM modified the Lotus Notes internet access so it doesn't recognize Netfront as an "authorized" browser. WTF? does that mean? Our computer support says that wireless access is not in the contract so there is no solution until someone important asks for it.

Anyway, I still laugh at our region manager. He carries a work cellphone, a personal cellphone, a pager, and a laptop. Like you said, until the managers [who don't very well know how to turn on a computer] wake up and make some automation decisions the computer support people will manage everything....and they would like to be back in the blue screen and more simple day.....so they are going to resist suggesting anything new.
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-21-2005, 02:09 AM
Tracy Daubenspeck
Pupil
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 40
Default Corporate nightmare

PDAs pose a real problem for IT support for most organizations. They are almost by definition non-standard. Each model and brand comes with different capabilites, software, and hardware. In my setting, wireless, IRDA, audio recording, and cameras are banned. We have to physically disable these features for each device thus voiding the warranty. Many organizations don't want "foreign" hardware attached to their networks.

Most of us PPC enthusiasts want the latest-and-greatest, while IT support folks want something that is tried and true. I think that there should be a corporate standard out there for PDAs, but it is wishful thinking.
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-21-2005, 02:26 AM
bvkeen
Intellectual
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 172

The execs at the company I work for (400 people) would say 'this is not working well enough for me,' IT would say 'it is the best technology there is for now OR the fix is cost prohibitive,' and that would end the discussion.

I do have pity on the IT staff trying to keep up with changing technology and equipment and software that doesn't really behave as it is supposed to, but none of these problems are ever going away until the execs get savvy and knowledgeable enough to work with IT in finding and forcing solutions. I'm not holding my breath on it.
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-21-2005, 03:18 AM
bkerrins
Intellectual
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 171

I can understand IT has the impossible task of keeping up to date with each and every version. But that doesn't make support impossible. Most IT guys know more in their little finger than I will ever know and if they would at least HELP, that would make me happy. I had to set up an application to allow my emails to be forwarded to my PDA and while my domain name is "easy", it's not something I use everyday in my job. If the IT guys were willing to stop by and help, he could have set the thing up in 5 minutes. I spent half the day. Plus, it pisses me off no end when I ask, "can you help" and I'm told, "no, that's not a supported device." Then when I walk by their desk...they have the same device!!
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-21-2005, 05:46 AM
SteveNYC
Pupil
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 16

Well, I'm responsible for the wireless unit in my government agency. We are currently running about 550 lines going from crappy TDMA devices (phasing out) to the newest CDMA Blackberry 7250.

It's nuts.... the idea of providing support is next to impossible. I'm going through new handsets every six months. Forget support, try keeping the things in STOCK! That's why so many IT shops are going with RIM devices. They are NOT the best units out there. But they ARE the most stable (relatively speaking).

I personally own a Sprint Treo 650 that I converted to work on Verizon. I would NEVER attempt to deploy that for my users. It would be almost impossible to support in any large scale deployment. So instead we deploy the 7250 and some 7290's and use BES 4.0. It's the best thing out there.

I would like to work with Good's offering, but in truth, there's not a considerable difference in functionality (in an enterprise deployment).

Heck, most of the people I have to give our latest and greatest phones don't even know what to do with them. They're more eye candy than anything else.

Smartphone technology, with the exception of RIM devices, is not ready ofr large scale deployment's.... at least not in my experience.

For the individual, well, that's different. There's a lot of nice equipment out there and a lot of good services being offered. But then you are your own tech support.
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-21-2005, 06:50 AM
JMountford
Thinker
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 360
Send a message via ICQ to JMountford Send a message via AIM to JMountford Send a message via MSN to JMountford Send a message via Yahoo to JMountford
Default It for the mobile enterprise.

The question at hand is "does the company you work for support mobile devices"...

I have to say that my company %100 supports all mobile devices with the best technology out there!!!! Now admittedly that is because I work for (arguably) the best mobile solutions provider out there. I am a Verizon Wireless Employee. I am very proud of my company and the technology that we use as well as sell. And now that I am in the Business Channel I see what solutions we can offer to our customers, and part of that is just the knowledge of specialists who can get as technical as any IT department, and are instrumental in setting up Enterprise based mobile solutions.

I am in no way trying to sound like a commercial or a VZW Drone as I am neither. I am a loyal employee, but I also have a mind of my own. I am not here to start an arguement or take a bashing as I am just one Employee among over 50,000. I am just saying that there are companies out there emplementing Mobile Enterprise Solutions. And Verzin has employees and solutions there for any one to use, but many companies do not realize that there are those resources available. I know statics that would annoy and astound the PPC community, but I will not disclose those. Suffice it to say that as a techy I find the general lack of knowledge that exists in business as far as mobile solutions goes is just mind boggling.
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-21-2005, 09:31 AM
Techtoys
Ponderer
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 56
Send a message via MSN to Techtoys

Our company allows you to use the devices so long as you buy your own device. What they then offer is a Lotus Notes sync solution that gets the corporate e-mail and calendar onto your device - but you have to promise that you will not sync at home any more as this could expose corporate information. It also removes activesync from your PC at the office. There is zero support for the rolled out solution - if it fails you have to hard reset and re-install.
That isn't a good solution in my book, so I manually update my calendar and contacts and book an hour to a non-productive tag each week.
Surprisingly, outside of the IT department (about 1900 of us 8O ) there is very little PDA use. Even in the department there are only about 100 users.
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-21-2005, 11:27 AM
Lex
Sage
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 601

Our sales force was issued -supported- PPCs for sales call data entry and nothing else. The proprietary software is so fat there's too little room to use the PPC as a true PIM. Can't use the Calendar, no voice recording, no Pocket Word or Pocket Excel. We just leave them home on our desks and enter data on our laptops at night. Oh, you have to have them cradled to sync every night. :roll: I own a personal PPC they can't control.
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-21-2005, 02:59 PM
Phillip Dyson
Mystic
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,520

Quote:
Originally Posted by bkerrins
I can understand IT has the impossible task of keeping up to date with each and every version. But that doesn't make support impossible. Most IT guys know more in their little finger than I will ever know and if they would at least HELP, that would make me happy. I had to set up an application to allow my emails to be forwarded to my PDA and while my domain name is "easy", it's not something I use everyday in my job. If the IT guys were willing to stop by and help, he could have set the thing up in 5 minutes. I spent half the day. Plus, it pisses me off no end when I ask, "can you help" and I'm told, "no, that's not a supported device." Then when I walk by their desk...they have the same device!!
I work in IT but not in operations. So while I don't provide desktop or device support, I can understand the reluctance of IT or an individual IT guy to offer support for a "rogue" device.

I support software/ business applications that I develop. Its well, known that once you offer support for something that is unofficial, you own support for that device. Then if someone else comes up with one, maybe by word of mouth it only grows. Where does it end?

The IT department has to consider the big picture. Of course this in no way discounts the possibility that your particular IT guy is just being a jerk.
__________________

Phone: Nexus one Backup Phone: AT&T Samsung Jack; Future Phone: I'm Watching WP7; Media Player: Platinum Zune HD 32GB; Home Server: HP MediaSmart Server LX195 Console: XBox 360, PS3, Wii
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:40 PM.