Windows Phone Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!


Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Android Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > WINDOWS PHONE THOUGHTS > Windows Phone Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-08-2005, 10:00 AM
Jonathon Watkins
Swami
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,303
Default The Gadgeteer Reviews the Dell X50v

http://www.the-gadgeteer.com/dell-x50v-review.html

". . .So, what do you think about the differences between the Dell Axim X50v Pocket PC and the HP hx4700 iPAQ Pocket PC? Both employ the same fast processor, both run Windows Mobile 2003 SE, and both have dual card slots, both have WiFi and Bluetooth. But for all these similarities, the iPAQ costs $150 more than the Dell. Is the iPAQ truly that much better? Hopefully this review will answer that question as I will be taking a close look at the Axim X50v Pocket PC."



This review of the Dell X50v starts from a slightly unusual perspective, namely that Julie from the Gadgeteer is an avid 4700 iPAQ user (even though she loathes the touchpad) and she end up extensively comparing and contrasting the two devices. This is no bad thing, especially if these two devices are on your shortlist for new Pocket PC devices. In typical Gadgeteer fashion it's a decent length review with plenty of photos and screenshots. So does Julie decide to ditch the dastardly 4700 for the dashing X50v? You'll just have to go and have a gander at the Gadgeteer to find out. ;-)
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-08-2005, 05:41 PM
wrevans
Neophyte
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 8

This is the first time I have posted but I can't keep quiet on this one. I have been a Dell fan for years they make a vary good reliable product at a fair price. In saying that, when it was time to replace my old AXIM X5 I ordered a new X50v, at the same time I ordered the X50v a coworker ordered the HP version. After comparing the 2 units the HP is a much better unit, the wireless works better, the screen looks better, and it's faster then the Dell. After looking at both units I returned the X50v, and keep the X5 no I did not get the HP. When compared to the X5, neither unit gave me $450 to $600 worth of improvements..
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-08-2005, 07:43 PM
Jonathon Watkins
Swami
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,303

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrevans
After comparing the 2 units the HP is a much better unit, the wireless works better
In what way does it work better? I'm curious.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrevans
..the screen looks better
Well, they both looked good to me. No major difference, apart from the 4700's increased (exaggerated) colour saturation.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrevans
..and it's faster then the Dell.
Again, in what way? The 624Mhz processor they both sport would say that they were equivalent and the Intel graphics accelerator on the Dell beats that on the 4700. Did the Dell have slow media cards installed when you looked at it?

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrevans
When compared to the X5, neither unit gave me $450 to $600 worth of improvements.
Looked at it that way, no PPC will give you a $450 improvement. I upgraded from my X5 as I wanted integral Wifi, Bluetooth, a VGA screen and a faster processor. I got all that and more. It was certainly worth it to me. Are you waiting for the next generation of PPC machines?
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-08-2005, 08:32 PM
MPSmith
Thinker
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 426

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrevans
This is the first time I have posted but I can't keep quiet on this one...
You lost me on that one. You've got posts going back to 2002!!!
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-08-2005, 08:56 PM
Jonathon Watkins
Swami
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,303

Quote:
Originally Posted by MPSmith
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrevans
This is the first time I have posted but I can't keep quiet on this one...
You lost me on that one. You've got posts going back to 2002!!!
Yup. You posted before I even joined the site Wrevans! ;-)
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-08-2005, 10:35 PM
Jonathan1
Pontificator
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,329

The buzzkill for me on the X50v was the battery life. Sorry but that is WAY to short for my tastes. The 4705 may be bigger and I swear it feels slower but I can literally go a week before I need to recharge. IMHO that is the most impressive aspect of the 4705. That and the fact that I found it for $575 with no shipping made it all the more sweeter. I have no regrets. I just hope HP does justice to my major purchase with an OS upgrade this summer but I�m not holding my breath on that one.
__________________
PDA History: Palm Pilot 5000 -> Apple Newton 2100 -> Casio E-11 -> iPaq 3650 (64MB Upgrade) -> iPaq 3700 -> Casio EM-500 -> HP Jornada 568 -> HP iPaq hx4705 www.spreadfirefox.com
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-08-2005, 11:57 PM
wrevans
Neophyte
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 8

Ok this was not my first post, but it's been a long time. By no means was my comparison vary detailed and no storage cards were in the units. It looked to me that the HP out preformed the Dell in several ways. First the wireless on the HP has a longer range, we put both units the same distance form several routers the HP worked when the Dell did not, the Dell seemed to quit about 20 to 25 feet from any router. Don't use Bluetooth. The screens, HP's is bigger and brighter then Dell's and a bit clearer. As for speed all I can say we both use Streets and Tips 2005 with the same map, the HP has faster response, it took less time to zoom in and out on the map. Dell was not much help when I talked to them about the wireless, and I was told I should not expect to get the same distance from the X50v as I would from a laptop. After reading about the new VGA unit I was expecting more that I got.
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-09-2005, 02:41 AM
Ripper014
Oracle
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 880

Unfortunately it is not a complete comparison of devices without looking at the Asus a730W... the Loox 720 and even the Toshiba e830. I would think that if one were given all 5 to evaluate... the winner more often than not would be the Loox.
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-09-2005, 03:33 AM
MPSmith
Thinker
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 426

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ripper014
Unfortunately it is not a complete comparison of devices without looking at the Asus a730W... the Loox 720 and even the Toshiba e830. I would think that if one were given all 5 to evaluate... the winner more often than not would be the Loox.
Those are all great devices, but if the X50v had a better battery, IMO there would be no discussion about which was the best. To me, that's its one bad point.

Honestly, could you go wrong with any of these? I think not!
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:43 PM.