12-02-2004, 10:00 AM
|
|
Swami
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,303
|
|
Windows CE's New Trick � Mobile Telephony
Engadget have a brief post about the new AXIA A108 PDA phone and they spotted that it's a bit unusual.
"�.the tri-band GSM/GPRS AXIA A108 doesn�t actually run on Windows Mobile�it runs on Windows CE .NET 4.2. Does have a lot of other stuff you may be interested in, like a 1.3 megapixel digital, a 2.2-inch, 240x320, 262,000 color LCD touchscreen, 64MB of flash ROM, 64MB of RAM, and an miniSD memory card slot. There is, as usual, no information about when this might ever come out here."
Interesting choice of OS. I wonder why they chose Windows CE 4.2 over Windows Mobile 2003. Still, it's anther example of the growing ubiquity of Windows CE. "You want Windows with that?" :wink:
|
| |
|
|
|
12-02-2004, 03:16 PM
|
|
Intellectual
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 209
|
|
Touch Screen on Smartphone.......Good!
:werenotworthy:
__________________
And there you are.
I was just thinking, "What could take this headache I have over that edge to a full blown migrane?"
And there you are.
- Dr. Cox, Scrubs
|
| |
|
|
|
12-02-2004, 03:20 PM
|
|
Swami
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,303
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jpaq
Touch Screen on Smartphone.......Good!
:werenotworthy:
|
Ah - true. Well spotted. I missed that small but vital point. :lol:
|
| |
|
|
|
12-02-2004, 03:38 PM
|
|
Theorist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 287
|
|
A while ago we had posted at SMA about Emblaze's Alpha P8 phone and mentioned that it is a Windows CE.net phone.
In an interview RobertS did here is what they said about the choice of OSes:
"SMA: Please describe the Alpha's use of Windows CE .net. Why was this approach chosen for the Alpha?
ER: We didn't really create our own operating system, we simply didn't go with the mainstream. The mainstream was Symbian or Nucleus as an embedded system or Smartphones 2003. The reason we went on CE .net is very simple, at the time none of the operating systems allowed the flexibility to do whatever you want, WHATEVER you want with it. Either Symbian or Smartphone would force you into UI flow, a certain experience and we wished to be able to have complete flexibility."
It does seem to make sense. There is more flexibility with Windows CE over SmartPhone. It is also quite possible that the licensing is less as well. :wink:
|
| |
|
|
|
12-02-2004, 04:12 PM
|
|
Executive Editor, Android Thoughts
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,233
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dazz
A while ago we had posted at SMA about Emblaze's Alpha P8 phone and mentioned that it is a Windows CE.net phone.
In an interview RobertS did here is what they said about the choice of OSes:
"SMA: Please describe the Alpha's use of Windows CE .net. Why was this approach chosen for the Alpha?
ER: We didn't really create our own operating system, we simply didn't go with the mainstream. The mainstream was Symbian or Nucleus as an embedded system or Smartphones 2003. The reason we went on CE .net is very simple, at the time none of the operating systems allowed the flexibility to do whatever you want, WHATEVER you want with it. Either Symbian or Smartphone would force you into UI flow, a certain experience and we wished to be able to have complete flexibility."
It does seem to make sense. There is more flexibility with Windows CE over SmartPhone. It is also quite possible that the licensing is less as well. :wink: |
Windows is flexible? Imagine the blasphemy if that were posted at a site like slashdot.
__________________
Dr. Jon Westfall, MCSE, MS-MVP
Executive Editor - Android Thoughts
News Editor - Windows Phone Thoughts
|
| |
|
|
|
12-02-2004, 04:37 PM
|
|
Theorist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 287
|
|
:lol: No doubt!
Actually, I meant that for OEM's Windows CE.net is more flexible. There is a much wider selection of hardware that will support it and it can be customized to include whatever software components the manufacturer wants.
Will that keep me safe from the Slashdot hoards? 
|
| |
|
|
|
12-02-2004, 04:53 PM
|
|
Intellectual
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 190
|
|
What software is compatible with Windows CE .NET? I assume Pocket PC software won't run in it, right? If so, is there a large selection of Windows CE .NET software out there?
|
| |
|
|
|
12-02-2004, 07:12 PM
|
|
Theorist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 287
|
|
There is a fair bit out there. You have to dig to find it but it's there.
Most people that are using these kinds of phones are really just using what comes with the OS.
For corporate buyers, they are probably just using a custom app anyway.
|
| |
|
|
|
12-03-2004, 06:18 AM
|
|
Sage
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 621
|
|
Isn't Windows Mobile also WinCE, what is the difference between the 2? Or is it a case of the square is always a rectangle but a rectangle isn't always a square?
|
| |
|
|
|
12-03-2004, 06:25 AM
|
|
Theorist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 287
|
|
Windows Mobile has WindowsCE at it's core but it "completes" the OS. :wink:
There are some enterprising types that have been able to figure out how to run WM programs on WinCE but it is rather tricky to get set up and does not work with all programs. Basically, you have the replace the OS dll's with "faked" ones that will allow the WM software to run.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
