10-09-2004, 12:00 AM
|
|
Magi
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,186
|
|
MobiPassword: Super-Duper Encryption-O-Matic Application
"MobiPassword is a cross-platform application, which consists of an Advanced Personal Information and Access Management solution for MS Windows (with a Single Sign-On subsystem) and several mobile client applications (for Palm OS handhelds, Windows Mobile Pocket PC devices, Windows Mobile Smartphones, and Sony Ericsson P800/P900 smart phones). The mobile clients are secure personal information organizers, which let you store and use your important personal information anytime, anywhere. These secure mobile organizers offer advanced level of protection (utilizing multi-level encryption and complex passwords) and easy retrieval of your personal information, such as passwords, IDs, account numbers and PINs. In addition, when used in connection with the PC module of the application, they allow you to login automatically to your various accounts on the Web such as web email, online shopping, bank accounts, and any other resources you access on the Internet."
There a few features of this application that seem to set it apart from other password/wallet-type programs. First and foremost would probably be the encryption. The Pocket PC client uses 256-bit encryption algorithms in conjunction with up to 5 levels of encryption with different passwords and the option of using different encryption algorithms. In layman's terms, this would be an excellent place to keep the password for my Super Secret Moon Destroying Device. :mrgreen: You can get just the Pocket PC client directly from the vendor for $14.95, OR you can purchase the desktop client bundled with the mobile client for only $29.95. [Affiliate] There's also a 21 day trial available if you want to kick the tires a bit before buying. Does anyone actually need this level of encryption? Discuss.
|
| |
|
|
|
10-09-2004, 12:20 AM
|
|
Mystic
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,725
|
|
Re: MobiPassword: Super-Duper Encryption-O-Matic Application
I'm very happy with FlexWallet 2005. More encryption is better, but application design is more important imo. In short, I wouldn't switch to this password program just because of better encryption.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pat Logsdon
|
btw, think that goes at the top of the post instead of the bottom so the news item is linked. (hmm...correcting people way too much recently  ops: )
|
| |
|
|
|
10-09-2004, 12:40 AM
|
|
Magi
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,186
|
|
Re: MobiPassword: Super-Duper Encryption-O-Matic Application
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by OSUKid7
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pat Logsdon
|
btw, think that goes at the top of the post instead of the bottom so the news item is linked. (hmm...correcting people way too much recently ops: ) |
Oops! Fixed! ops:
|
| |
|
|
|
10-09-2004, 01:34 AM
|
|
Contributing Editor Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,228
|
|
256 bit? if the encryption is based on the password wouldn't yourypassword need to be 50+ characters? My understanding of apps like eWallet is that you have to have 9/10 characters just to get over 40 bit encryption.
|
| |
|
|
|
10-09-2004, 01:42 AM
|
|
Pontificator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,079
|
|
I think they don't have a good understanding of how PPCs work: the top application bar is already taken by utility bars such as Gigabar, WisBar and the like or even by OS notifications like time, battery state and connectivity status.
While this application is using it for its own icons, therefore functionality, like search it seems, and display important texts; these will assuredly be covered by such utility bars.
Bad, bad :evil:
.
|
| |
|
|
|
10-09-2004, 01:54 AM
|
|
Pontificator
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,329
|
|
Interesting....AFAIC there is no such thing as too much encryption just too many hoops to jump through to authenticate.
__________________
PDA History: Palm Pilot 5000 -> Apple Newton 2100 -> Casio E-11 -> iPaq 3650 (64MB Upgrade) -> iPaq 3700 -> Casio EM-500 -> HP Jornada 568 -> HP iPaq hx4705 www.spreadfirefox.com |
| |
|
|
|
10-09-2004, 05:53 PM
|
|
Thinker
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 357
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jlp
I think they don't have a good understanding of how PPCs work: the top application bar is already taken by utility bars such as Gigabar, WisBar and the like or even by OS notifications like time, battery state and connectivity status.
While this application is using it for its own icons, therefore functionality, like search it seems, and display important texts; these will assuredly be covered by such utility bars.
Bad, bad :evil:
.
|
Agreed... I CANNOT STAND applications that take over and remove access to the start menu and menu bar. Where are the Pocket PC user interface design guidelines and why aren't people following them?
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
