Thoughts Media.com

 


Windows Phone Thoughts

Loading feed...

Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Apple Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > Thoughts Media Off Topic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-20-2004, 09:00 PM
Ed Hansberry
Contributing Editor Emeritus
Ed Hansberry's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,228
Default New Jersey Mom Sues RIAA under RICO Statutes

http://www.nj.com/news/ledger/jersey/index.ssf?/base/news-5/107708869350700.xml

We've discussed the gestapo tactics of the RIAA in the past. It seems one mom in New Jersey is turning the tables on the RIAA.

"The music industry considers Michele Scimeca a pirate. The Morris County mom has her own term for record executives: Racketeers. In what legal experts described as a novel strategy, Scimeca is citing federal racketeering laws like the one that jailed mob boss John Gotti to countersue record labels that accused her in December of sharing some 1,400 copyrighted songs over the Internet."

Go get 'em. :evil:
__________________
text sig
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-20-2004, 09:08 PM
ricksfiona
Pontificator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,041
Send a message via AIM to ricksfiona

Oooh, I like this... The RIAA is going to look like total jerks trying to sue a mom.... :lol:
__________________
Rick Gomez - Owner/Consultant
fiona Systems Integration
www.fionasystems.com
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-20-2004, 09:20 PM
Pat Logsdon
Magi
Pat Logsdon's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,186

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricksfiona
Oooh, I like this... The RIAA is going to look like total jerks trying to sue a mom.... :lol:
Well, they didn't seem to care too much when they sued a grandfather or a 12 year old girl...
__________________
redbatphotography.com
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-20-2004, 09:20 PM
Foo Fighter
Pontificator
Foo Fighter's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,466
Send a message via MSN to Foo Fighter

Regardless of what boneheaded tactics the RIAA uses...downloading music via P2P networks is illegal. And those who engage in this practice deserve prosecution. Downloading "free" music is no different than shoplifting at Sam Goody.
__________________
Kent Pribbernow
Elitist Snob, Contributing writer for Wired's Cult of Mac
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-20-2004, 09:28 PM
c38b2
Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 217

Quote:
Originally Posted by Foo Fighter
Downloading "free" music is no different than shopplifting at Sam Goody.
I won't argue that it isn't wrong or a crime or illegal, but saying it's no different than shoplifting is a little bit of a stretch. It's more like someone bought the CD, made tons of copies of it and left them lying on the street. Sure, the copies are illegal but the criminals are the ones who copied and mass-distributed them. :|
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-20-2004, 09:31 PM
Jacob
Pontificator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,162

Quote:
Originally Posted by Foo Fighter
Regardless of what boneheaded tactics the RIAA uses...downloading music via P2P networks is illegal. And those who engage in this practice deserve prosecution. Downloading "free" music is no different than shopplifting at Sam Goody.
Right, but you don't sued to the tune of $150,000 per song if you shoplift a CD from Sam Goody
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-20-2004, 09:33 PM
MasterOfMoo
Ponderer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 63

:lol:
Here, here!

I'm not even going to begin debating the sides in P2P music sharing, because there are slew of these already available on the 'net. As for the woman's actions, I applaud her. The stance of the RIAA has been far too despotic from my viewpoint.

I'll be interested to see how this one turns out.

- Moo
__________________
um, Moo
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-20-2004, 09:37 PM
jpaq
Intellectual
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 209

I'm waiting on someone to go after the RIAA for ani-trust violations.......

Hmmmm?

If this RICO case gets anywhere, I think anti-trust would be an even stronger argument.
__________________
And there you are.
I was just thinking, "What could take this headache I have over that edge to a full blown migrane?"
And there you are.
- Dr. Cox, Scrubs
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-20-2004, 09:39 PM
MasterOfMoo
Ponderer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 63

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacob
Right, but you don't sued to the tune of $150,000 per song if you shoplift a CD from Sam Goody
http://www.wisinfo.com/journal/spjlo...66309146.shtml

Especially considering shoplifting fines for low dollar items usually are in the range of $250'ish.

Let's see:
  • Approx 10 songs (varies, of course) = 1 CD
    1 CD = Approx $15.00-$20.00 (falling under the $50-mark noted in the article I linked, thereby basing this on the $250 fine)
  • 10 songs = $250 fine
    1 song = $25 fine
or with the RIAA
  • 1 song = $150,000 fine
    1 CD (10 songs) = $1,500,000 fine
I don't think Sam Goody would get away with that, why does the RIAA?
__________________
um, Moo
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-20-2004, 09:45 PM
Ed Hansberry
Contributing Editor Emeritus
Ed Hansberry's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,228

Quote:
Originally Posted by Foo Fighter
Regardless of what boneheaded tactics the RIAA uses...downloading music via P2P networks is illegal. And those who engage in this practice deserve prosecution. Downloading "free" music is no different than shoplifting at Sam Goody.
100% in agreement, but prosecution is to be done within your civil rights, and the tactics the RIAA used can be seen to violate those rights.
__________________
text sig
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright Thoughts Media Inc. 2009