Windows Phone Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!


Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Android Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > WINDOWS PHONE THOUGHTS > Windows Phone Articles & Resources

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-07-2002, 08:00 PM
Jason Dunn
Executive Editor
Jason Dunn's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29,160
Default PC unreliability rears its ugly head again

http://www.siliconvalley.com/docs/opinion/dgillmor/dg020602.htm

From the "It seemed like a good idea at the time" department, this column by Dan Gillmor points to the ugly crossroads where reality and technology meet. Looks like a fender-bender to me! I promise the next posting will be some form of good news. ;-)

"The young woman at the technical support desk worked for Compaq, according to the name tag on her green shirt. She did not appear to be having a great day.

In a gesture designed to win friends for its iPaq handheld computers, Compaq had handed out the devices, equipped with connections to a wireless network inside the Waldorf Astoria hotel in New York, to several thousand corporate chief executives, high-ranking government officials and others attending the annual meeting of the World Economic Forum. One problem: The system was broken, and its would-be users were not pleased.

Oh, it worked some of the time. But far too often, attendees -- who'd waited in long lines to get the iPaqs in the first place -- couldn't make the devices handle the promised functions, such as sending and receiving e-mail and signing up for panels. I had to reset mine repeatedly when it stopped responding. Like many others, I headed back to the support desk to ask the beleaguered tech staff for help.

No one pointed fingers, at least not officially. Compaq may have been least blameworthy. The key software was from Microsoft, whose Pocket PC operating system powers the iPaq, and Hayward-based AvantGo, which supplied a program to synchronize the devices with the central server computers. The Accenture consulting firm was the ``systems integrator,'' responsible for putting it all together."
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-07-2002, 08:47 PM
willh
Neophyte
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5
Default So It's Not Just Me...

When I read about the WEF using a wireless LAN with iPaqs for session info and even video of sessions - I thought "What am I missing?"

From my own experience, I can get many of these things to work (remote syncing, fluid video, etc) ... but not without a lot of trial and error. If it were not a hobby of mine ~ there would be no way I would work on these things as much or as hard as I do... in other words - I wouldn't expect the average user to go through what I do to make some of the advanced (and not so advanced) aspects of the PocketPC work.

I read that Accenture provided the back end integration - and thought - "Well - they must have it all together so that this system will go off like clockwork." Not so. It's depressing so find out that implementing these systems with functions that "should" work - in fact, didn't work.
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-07-2002, 08:58 PM
Tari Akpodiete
Ponderer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 102

or maybe, they should just have had Chris De Herrera set it up for them...
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-07-2002, 10:15 PM
fmcpherson
Intellectual
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 183

I believe that Compaq provided iPAQs at last year's Davos so this wasn't something entirely new. This article was Gillmor's usual hit and run against Microsoft, and provided little detail. What exactly where people trying to do?

The very first thing I would suspect, given the limited amount of information, is the wireless network.

On the other hand, I have had a 3870 for a couple of weeks and there is something definitely not right about it, and I am suspecting the SD/MMC driver.
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-08-2002, 12:44 PM
Mr. PPC
Intellectual
Mr. PPC's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 126
Send a message via MSN to Mr. PPC

I can see two possible reasons that it didn't work, not talking hardware. The hardware wasn't the problem, poor management was.

Either it never worked or was flakey. If that was the case it should never have been rolled-out.

or...

It worked, but do to STUPID USERS (applying the generic term) there were problems and Compaq didn't staff the support desk correctly. One support person alone is not even close to what I would have recommended, especially considering who the users were.

There will always be problems, part of managing is looking at risks and making plans to deal with them. Clearly this wasn't done!
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:25 PM.