Digital Home Thoughts

Digital Home Thoughts - News & Reviews for the Digital Home

Register in our forums so you're ready for our next giveaway contest...


Zune Thoughts

Loading feed...

Apple Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > DIGITAL HOME THOUGHTS > Digital Home Hardware & Accessories

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 04-22-2004, 08:32 PM
Jason Kravitz
Intellectual
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 143
Default Zoom Lens - too many choices too little cash!

I've been taking a bird watching class (and like photographing birds) and wanted to get closer to the birdies than I can with my 75-300mm USM IS lens. I've enjoyed using the this lens but notice from far away the images are not very sharp and I still can't get as close as I'd like...

One option I was thinking about was digiscoping - using a spotting scope with a camera attached to it although the high end scopes cost about $1800 and attaching the 300D would make it an F11 and above which is not too practical...

I think I've narrowed it down and was curious to hear what other people think who may own or have used these lenses (prices based on B&H price)

- Sigma 50-500mm F4.0-6.3 $939
good: long reach less expensive
bad: optics not as good as Canon L and 6.3 is slow

- Sigma 120-300mm F2.8 $1899
good: fast lens can use 2x teleconverter with auto-focus for 600mm
bad: optics not as good and price higher than other L choices

- Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS $1649 ($50 rebate)
(there is also a f/4.0 but am not considering it)
good: canon L glass, fast lens can use 2x teleconverter with auto-focus
bad: even with 2x tele is not much more reach than my current 75-300 and on high end of price

- Canon 300mm f/4.0L IS $1149.95 ($50 rebate)
(I'd love the f/2.8 but it costs $3500+)
good: canon L glass, f/4.0 faster than my 300 at 5.6 could use 1.4x tele or 2x with manual focus
bad: not a zoom lens so I lose the 75-300 range that I currently have

- Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS $1389.95 ($50 rebate)
good: canon L glass, longest range, could use 1.4x tele and even 2x although it would be slow
bad: 5.6 not super fast but same as I currently have, heavy

I'm pretty set on the 100-400 right now although I'm curious if besides being twice as heavy if I will see noticeable differences in quality compared to my current lens. My 75-300 is not the fastest to focus and I'm wondering if the 100-400 will help here as well...

I talked to Lee a bit about this already and am sure he'll have some good thoughts - anyone else care to chime in??
 
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:45 AM.