09-25-2011, 03:24 PM
|
|
Intellectual
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 137
|
|
I always find it interesting that when AnandTech reviews Apple monitors, they give them all sorts of praise, but when you look at the charts, they nearly always appear in the bottom third. If they're so wonderful, why are they in the bottom third nearly every time? Maybe all of the monitors in that group are good, but if that's the case, why don't all of the other monitors receive similar praise?
There's something funny going on there.
I also believe there is a fundamental misunderstanding of how the Thunderbolt monitors work. I believe that only changes are sent to the monitors over Thunderbolt, not the full image stream. So failing to include full-screen motion video in their performance test sort of ignores where performance could be hit the most.
Not their finest work.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Threaded Mode