01-06-2009, 10:33 PM
|
|
Pupil
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 10
|
|
The Unibody 17-inch MacBook Pro
"Finally providing a noticeable difference between the MacBook and MacBook Pro, Apple has pushed the Pro's screen to 17 inches, its price to $2799, and thrown in a high-capacity (non-replaceable!) battery. The new Pro has the unibody aluminum build—and virtually everything else—in common with its smaller 15" brother. But now you won't have to put your fancy new notebook next to the cheaper 13" variant to see what you've paid for." 
When Phil Schiller announced the new unibody 17-inch MacBook Pro, I wasn't too surprised to find out it was only an inch thick and 6.6 pounds. Apple has always impressed me with their intuitive designs, and lately they keep getting better and better making their laptops thinner and lighter. The most shocking change to the new MacBook Pro, is the built-in, non-removable lithium polyer battery with a lifecycle 3 times longer than standard laptop batteries. Apple went out of their way to develop a new larger, custom battery that should run 8 hours and live through 1,000 charges quite easily. I look forward to getting my hands on the new MacBook Pro and seeing whether or not the new battery stands the test of time.
|
| |
|
|
|
01-06-2009, 11:06 PM
|
|
Intellectual
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 251
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Barrett
I look forward to getting my hands on the new MacBook Pro and seeing whether or not the new battery stands the test of time.
|
Yeah, this is the $64,000 question in my opinion. Apple is taking a HUGE risk in having a non-removable battery in such an expensive laptop. I wonder if it will pay off.
__________________
2.4 20" aluminum iMac - August 2007
2.2 15" MacBook Pro - January 2008
8GB 1G iPhone - January 2008
|
| |
|
|
|
01-06-2009, 11:52 PM
|
|
Executive Editor Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,471
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ucfgrad93
Yeah, this is the $64,000 question in my opinion. Apple is taking a HUGE risk in having a non-removable battery in such an expensive laptop. I wonder if it will pay off.
|
I'm infuriated that the battery is not removable. It may be the best battery in the known universe, but the idea that I would have to lose my computer for a day or so just to get the battery replaced, to me, is unacceptable. There's no reason they couldn't put those same cells in the same case with a removable form factor. None.
Considering one of the only things that ever failed me on my BlackBook (which Michael now owns) is the battery, the idea of not being able to do that "repair" myself makes me cringe.
__________________
Current Apple Stuff: 24" iMac, iPhone 4, AppleTV (original), 4gb Shuffle, 64gb iPad 2.
|
| |
|
|
|
01-07-2009, 01:11 AM
|
|
Sage
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 639
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent Ferrari
I'm infuriated that the battery is not removable. It may be the best battery in the known universe, but the idea that I would have to lose my computer for a day or so just to get the battery replaced, to me, is unacceptable. There's no reason they couldn't put those same cells in the same case with a removable form factor. None.
|
I agree 100%, but get used to it. This seems to be Apple's new "design language" or whatever. First iPods, then iPhones, then MB Airs, then MB Pros. What's left? Well, nothing portable except the 2 remaining MBs.
At first I thought the batteries had a new chemistry (like silver-zinc), but they are just lithium polymer with a slightly different manufacturing process that produce less round cells (more "rectangularer"?). The only "magic" that increases life seems to be in the built in management chips. Noting innately special/super-expensive at all. So we'll probably see this moved down-market in the next MB/MBP iteration. Unfortunately, this isn't "the best battery in the known universe."
MAYBE this is just an experiment to see if they should/shouldn't do it in the higher volume lappies, but I'm guessing it is the "future." 'Tis a shame...
|
| |
|
|
|
01-07-2009, 02:06 AM
|
|
Executive Editor Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,471
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ptyork
I agree 100%, but get used to it. This seems to be Apple's new "design language" or whatever. First iPods, then iPhones, then MB Airs, then MB Pros. What's left? Well, nothing portable except the 2 remaining MBs.
|
I honestly don't think so; I think it was just a space saving measure so they could mitigate the giganticness of the 17" MBP. My 15" MBP has a battery that's every bit as removable as any other notebook. I still don't think this is a smart move. Even if it's great, people will complain simply because they can't remove the battery whether they have any kind of need to or not.
__________________
Current Apple Stuff: 24" iMac, iPhone 4, AppleTV (original), 4gb Shuffle, 64gb iPad 2.
|
| |
|
|
|
01-07-2009, 03:11 PM
|
|
Sage
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 676
|
|
Battery aside, this thing looks pretty sweet. Too bad I bought a MBP last Spring, so am not due for a refresh for at least 2 more years (and realistically probably more like 4 more years considering how expensive they are). I still think I would opt for a 15" MBP though as for me that's the sweet spot for laptop size. 17" screens are just too big to be truly portable for me, and at home I can always use an external monitor anyway.
__________________
64 GB iPad 2 WiFi, Apple TV 2, 32 GB iPhone 4
Early 2011 MacBook Pro 13" (dual boot with Windows 7), Early 2009 Mac Mini
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
