Windows Phone Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!


Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Android Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > WINDOWS PHONE THOUGHTS > Windows Phone Articles & Resources

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-05-2008, 06:00 PM
Janak Parekh
Editor Emeritus
Janak Parekh's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 15,171
Default TamsPPC Interviews HP Austria About WM Strategy

http://tamsppc.tamoggemon.com/2008/...uber-interview/

"HP's mobile strategy has recently left a few open questions in some analyst's heads. As TamsPPC has had an excellent relationship with HP ever since we debuted on a rx4240, we proudly present you this interview with Rudolf Gruber. Rudolf Gruber is the sales manager for mobile devices for HP Austria - he sat down with us for a no-holds-barred interview looking at topics like custom UI's, PDAs, the future of touchscreen devices and Windows Mobile 6.1 upgrades."

I want to commend Tom Hanna of TamsPPC for asking some necessary questions of HP and writing this article.  That said, I was extremely disappointed with this interview; if anything, it reinforces my negative perception of HP.  They refuse to go into detail about how they will differentiate themselves from the rest of the industry ("investing a lot of R&D"?  Meaning?) and sidestep many of the issues (the WM6.1 "explanation" was particularly bad, in my opinion, even from a business standpoint).  To be brutally honest, I think HP deserves its increasingly marginal role; it could have owned the entire handheld world a few years ago, but tossed it out the window, and still doesn't have a clue, despite making a few attractive devices.  Is there anyone in our readership that plans to invest in HP mobile devices in the near future?

 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-05-2008, 10:44 PM
Fritzly
Sage
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 740

I am not surprised at all aboout HP attitude; the people in charge nowadays are the leftover of that arrogant and greedy champion of incompetency that was Carly Fiorina; she and her accolytes destroyed not only the potential mobile market but, much worse and tragic, the one that HP was synonimous of: the printer market.
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-06-2008, 02:17 AM
Pony99CA
Swami
Pony99CA's Avatar
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,396
Default Hp & wm

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janak Parekh View Post
That said, I was extremely disappointed with this interview; if anything, it reinforces my negative perception of HP.  They refuse to go into detail about how they will differentiate themselves from the rest of the industry ("investing a lot of R&D"?  Meaning?) and sidestep many of the issues (the WM6.1 "explanation" was particularly bad, in my opinion, even from a business standpoint).
I particularly liked this bit of corporate speak when asked about lower-priced devices. "Portfolio bandwidth including affordable price bands are major influencers in the Smart Mobile Device Market." Who speaks like that? (To be fair, maybe the translator "helped" there.) Is that the same as saying "Having affordable devices is important," or does it mean something else?

However, I think your comment about R&D spending was off-base. Here's the full quotation:

Quote:
Nevertheless for larger screens the future is highres, touchscreen and improved UI. HP is investing a lot in R&D for those areas to develop products, which are time to market in terms of latest technology, securing a superior user experience.
I think it's clear what "investing a lot in R&D" means there -- HP is researching (and maybe developing) devices with larger high-res touch screens and improved user interfaces. I wouldn't expect anything more detailed than that.

I also didn't think the WM 6.1 explanation was that bad. Remember that the question was asked specifically about the HP 210/211.

Quote:
Taking Windows Mobile 6.1, the key improvements were rather relevant for the Smartphones (eg. UI, OTA device management), which are not of big value for pen/based PDAs. On top of that the 21x platform is mainly selling into Enterprise and MidMarket, where long life cycles and ROM stability are key influencers.

A big part of HPs enterprise customers are running their own applications on our pen/based products. Thats the reason why their are expecting platform stability for at least 2yrs.
We're obviously not happy with it, but for enterprise customers deploying mission-critical applications, I can understand why they'd want ROM stability.

Of course, that doesn't mean that HP couldn't develop a WM 6.1 upgrade for those customers that wanted it; nobody would be forced to use it. However, having to support two OS releases would increase HP's support burden (they couldn't say "We're only supporting WM 6.1" to customers that kept WM 6.0 for stability).

Basically, we're not the target market for the 210/211. It's called an "Enterprise Handheld", even.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janak Parekh View Post
To be brutally honest, I think HP deserves its increasingly marginal role; it could have owned the entire handheld world a few years ago, but tossed it out the window, and still doesn't have a clue, despite making a few attractive devices.  Is there anyone in our readership that plans to invest in HP mobile devices in the near future?
I agree that HP could have done a lot better. They used to provide OS upgrades for most of their devices, and now provide almost none. They do seem to provide bug fixes, though.

As for buying an HP device, I'm considering the 210/211. I can get one for under $300, but the announced lack of a WM 6.1 upgrade worries me. Will they provide an upgrade to WM 6.5 or WM 7? Based on their history lately, I'm guessing they won't.

Steve
__________________
Silicon Valley Pocket PC
http://www.svpocketpc.com
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-06-2008, 06:54 PM
SomeAudioGuy
Neophyte
SomeAudioGuy's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 9
Send a message via Skype™ to SomeAudioGuy

I still maintain the last great standalone PPC was the HX2750. Nothing since has come close to that level of performance, and the built in fingerprint scanner was a perfect way to easily lock down a device without having to enter an alphanumeric password on a soft keyboard.

I just don't see any real focus from HP. The devices look nice, but they just seem to be basic spec pda's. We're a long way removed from the days where HP/Compaq used to innovate in this space.

Also I guess my needs have moved on too. When I can pick up an HTC Touch Pro for less than a 210, I'll deal with some of the compromises (slower cpu, smaller screen) to use the more feature packed device (more RAM/ROM, gps, cell radio, best keyboard on the market) and carry one less bulge on my utility belt.
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-07-2008, 10:50 PM
Janak Parekh
Editor Emeritus
Janak Parekh's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 15,171

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pony99CA View Post
I think it's clear what "investing a lot in R&D" means there -- HP is researching (and maybe developing) devices with larger high-res touch screens and improved user interfaces. I wouldn't expect anything more detailed than that.
I disagree. This is a generic checklist that every mobile device vendor is looking into, so HP is providing no new details here.

In the past, HP had designed videos for concept devices that were particularly stunning. Those concept devices never made it to market, but that was a great idea to demonstrate their R&D is still alive. I've not seen any such thing since -- just corporate-speak.

Quote:
We're obviously not happy with it, but for enterprise customers deploying mission-critical applications, I can understand why they'd want ROM stability.
That's a cop-out. I've done enterprise support for a variety of applications, and enterprises want both stability and upgradability to maximize the lifetime of their hardware investment, especially if newer versions of WM improve enterprise integration and related features. Microsoft even published a document about new management security features in WM6.1 for enterprises. Some of these only apply to phones, but I consider encryption to be a biggie in particular for all classes of handhelds.

The one class of enterprise apps I would consider upgrades to be bad for are vertical applications (i.e., POS devices etc.); if HP is trying to make that the keystone of their argument, then they should focus on it and explain in greater detail.

Quote:
Of course, that doesn't mean that HP couldn't develop a WM 6.1 upgrade for those customers that wanted it; nobody would be forced to use it. However, having to support two OS releases would increase HP's support burden (they couldn't say "We're only supporting WM 6.1" to customers that kept WM 6.0 for stability).
Well, consider passing the cost on to customers, then. The enterprise market could certainly consider future-proofing a feature. To dismiss it by saying that the enterprise wouldn't even want this is weak.

--janak
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-09-2008, 03:00 AM
Pony99CA
Swami
Pony99CA's Avatar
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,396
Default HP Upgrades

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janak Parekh View Post
I disagree. This is a generic checklist that every mobile device vendor is looking into, so HP is providing no new details here.
Perhaps, but I think they spelled it out more than your initial story implied. It may have been a generic feature list, but it wasn't just "more R&D spending", either.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janak Parekh View Post
In the past, HP had designed videos for concept devices that were particularly stunning. Those concept devices never made it to market, but that was a great idea to demonstrate their R&D is still alive. I've not seen any such thing since -- just corporate-speak.
I don't recall any of those videos. Do you have a link to any that are still active? (I'm not doubting you, just curious to see what they were like.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janak Parekh View Post
The one class of enterprise apps I would consider upgrades to be bad for are vertical applications (i.e., POS devices etc.); if HP is trying to make that the keystone of their argument, then they should focus on it and explain in greater detail.
I assumed that's what they meant when they said, "A big part of HPs enterprise customers are running their own applications on our pen/based products."

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janak Parekh View Post
Well, consider passing the cost on to customers, then. The enterprise market could certainly consider future-proofing a feature. To dismiss it by saying that the enterprise wouldn't even want this is weak.
I don't believe Compaq or HP ever provided free OS upgrades; they were $30 (maybe $40). They probably felt that would cover their costs, but maybe it didn't, and they'd have to price the upgrades so high now that almost nobody would buy them. If that's the case, why bother producing them at all?

I guess I'm just not as incensed at HP this time as I was over their WM 2003 SE non-upgrade excuses. Or maybe I've just come to expect less from them nowadays than I used to. It's too bad, because (as you said) they probably could have owned a bigger part of the Windows Mobile space than they do now.

Steve
__________________
Silicon Valley Pocket PC
http://www.svpocketpc.com
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:35 PM.