05-28-2008, 12:25 PM
|
|
Developer & Designer, News Editor Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,959
|
|
Benchmarked: HTC Touch Diamond vs. 50 Others
If you're one of the few who loves a good benchmark, head over to SoloPalmari (translated version) to see how the HTC Touch Diamond fares against a whopping fifty other devices. You may find the results surprising.
|
| |
|
|
|
05-28-2008, 01:50 PM
|
|
Ponderer
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 98
|
|
Their screens show it as only having 128MB RAM and I thought specs listed it as having 192MB RAM. Isn't this also going to affect the benchmark to some extent?
--Chris
|
| |
|
|
|
05-28-2008, 02:21 PM
|
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 541
|
|
Given that the used SBP Benchmark wasn't updated since WM5 (Video accelerators in Advantage and Diamond are definately not supported) and considering that Asus A639 and G900 have something wrong with their file system result (either that or everything was done in RAM - the difference between them and all the others is just too much for reading and writing to flash)
Considering above, the result is as expected - I would say that Diamond and Advantage are the fastest WM devices at the moment.
|
| |
|
|
|
05-28-2008, 04:59 PM
|
|
Ponderer
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 50
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by alese
Given that the used SBP Benchmark wasn't updated since WM5 (Video accelerators in Advantage and Diamond are definately not supported) and considering that Asus A639 and G900 have something wrong with their file system result (either that or everything was done in RAM - the difference between them and all the others is just too much for reading and writing to flash)
Considering above, the result is as expected - I would say that Diamond and Advantage are the fastest WM devices at the moment.
|
I can't get the translator page to open...but it looks like the Diamond did well except in graphics. I was surprised, but given what you said above, maybe that's the explanation?
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
