10-19-2007, 03:00 PM
|
|
Contributing Editor Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,228
|
|
Cell Phone Use Coming To Flights In Europe
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7050576.stm
"Passengers could soon be using their mobile phones on planes flying through European airspace. Plans have been developed across EU countries to introduce technology which permits mobile calls without risk of interference with aircraft systems."
A few weeks ago, we reported that cell phone usage on US flights would not be permitted. I am thankful I don't have that to look forward to here in the US. My condolences to my European friends.
|
| |
|
|
|
10-19-2007, 04:37 PM
|
|
Pontificator
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,183
|
|
Europeans don't want loud Americans using phones on planes either ... ;-)
|
| |
|
|
|
10-19-2007, 05:20 PM
|
|
Executive Editor
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29,160
|
|
I'd be really interested to hear what our European community members think of this... 8O
|
| |
|
|
|
10-19-2007, 06:56 PM
|
|
Thinker
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 484
|
|
Quote:
"Plans have been developed across EU countries to introduce technology which permits mobile calls without risk of interference with aircraft systems."...
"Research published in 2003 by the CAA found mobile phone signals skewed navigation bearing displays by up to five degrees."
|
I would like to read the details on this. Navigation for commercial aircraft should all be digital now and even the combined signals of 100 mobile phones should not be able to offset the bearing.
In the USA, the issue of cellular phone use in aircraft had as much to do with the disruption of the cellular network caused by having a phone active in a location above and equidistant to many cell sites which is also moving from site to site at 600 MPH.
Having a pico-cell on the plane will reduce the signal strength from each of the on-board phones so they don't hit the ground-based cells. That's good for the network and also as a bonus would increase the battery life for the phones.
Of course, all of the above addresses the technical advantages to the proposed "technology". It says nothing about the fact that I don't think phone usage on an aircraft is a socially acceptable activity. :roll:
|
| |
|
|
|
10-19-2007, 07:40 PM
|
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 554
|
|
And how much that plane roaming will cost to a traveler? I bet enough to discourage anyone from using it.
|
| |
|
|
|
10-19-2007, 08:07 PM
|
|
Thinker
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 484
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by virain
And how much that plane roaming will cost to a traveler? I bet enough to discourage anyone from using it.
|
I worry about the worst offenders: teenage girls yapping about nothing for the whole flight without realizing (or caring) that their parents will see a huge bill at the end of the month. 8O
|
| |
|
|
|
10-20-2007, 05:09 AM
|
|
Pupil
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 37
|
|
What's astonishing, is how many non-pilots think aircraft use the latest navigation and communication equipment. In fact, many aircraft still use decade old radios, and few airliners use GPS... it's not considered reliable enough... they use inertial navigation instead.
As for phone interference, there have been plenty of pilot reports. Do you think the GSM buzz hurts your ears at home? Try listening to Air Traffic Control when some selfish person in the back has their phone going.
It is NOT the same as being around cell towers. Phones INSIDE a metal tube are quite a different thing.
All that said, the very latest (year old) airliners could have been shielded well enough, and have new avionics, and be able to handle the phones.
What can't handle the phones, will be the passengers. Cannot you foresee air rage on a scale never seen before? Wow.
Kev
engineer, pilot
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
