Windows Phone Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!


Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Android Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > WINDOWS PHONE THOUGHTS > Windows Phone Articles & Resources

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-12-2007, 01:30 PM
Ed Hansberry
Contributing Editor Emeritus
Ed Hansberry's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,228
Default The Problem With DRM - It Is Just Named Wrong!

http://blog.wired.com/business/2007/05/hbos_exec_dont_.html

"People don't like DRM, perhaps that's just because it's such a smelly word. HBO's chief technology officer Bob Zitter thinks so, he wants to ditch the term DRM in favor of "DCE," or, "Digital Consumer Enablement." Speaking at the National Cable & Telecommunications Association show in Las Vegas, HBO's top techie said the new term would better describe all the peachy ways that copyright holders and providers could dictate how consumers access content: "Digital Consumer Enablement, would more accurately describe technology that allows consumers "to use content in ways they haven't before," such as enjoying TV shows and movies on portable video players like iPods. "I don't want to use the term DRM any longer," said Zitter, who added that content-protection technology could enable various new applications for cable operators."

There are just so many things wrong with that statement I don't know where to even begin. :roll:
__________________
text sig
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-12-2007, 05:22 PM
frankenbike
Intellectual
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 214

He must have just read Orwell's 1984 for the first time.
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-12-2007, 09:17 PM
hamishmacdonald
Thinker
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 454

Enablement. That's not even a word, let's start there.

"Let's not call it an iceberg. Let's call it a Low Centigrade Hydro-Floatament. And tell the band to play faster -- FASTER!"

"Uh, Captain, I really think it's time for us to--"

"Faster, damn you!"
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-12-2007, 10:40 PM
Paragon
Magi
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,341

Quote:
Originally Posted by hamishmacdonald

"Let's not call it an iceberg. Let's call it a Low Centigrade Hydro-Floatament. And tell the band to play faster -- FASTER!"

"Uh, Captain, I really think it's time for us to--"

"Faster, damn you!"
Too bad this idiot wasn't on the Titanic.

I have a hard time figuring out of people like this guy are stupid or arrogant. Is he so stupid that he believes that HBO customers lack the intelligence to see the problem with statements like that, or is he so arrogant that he thinks he can get away it?

I see an iceberg in this man's future.
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-13-2007, 03:47 AM
bnycastro
Sage
bnycastro's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 621
Send a message via MSN to bnycastro Send a message via Yahoo to bnycastro

what a silly statement.
__________________
bnycastro: blog|twitter|plurk
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-13-2007, 08:35 PM
Sven Johannsen
Editorial Contributor
Sven Johannsen's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,411

That's not that much different than all the "features" Windows has had over the years. To take extreme license with Shakespeare, A fart, by any other name, would still smell.
__________________
Sometimes you are the anteater, sometimes you are the ant.
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-14-2007, 03:43 PM
Darren Behan
Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 242

If it looks like dog crap, smells like dog crap and tastes like dog crap (don't ask me how I know that) calling it 'beach sand' won't make me any more likely to want to step in it barefooted...

db
__________________
'It has been my experience that the more extreme the opinion, the less likely it is to be based on or altered by fact.'*- db
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-14-2007, 04:31 PM
quetopaq
Neophyte
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 9

With the risk of being considered arrrogant too, I don't believe the media industry gets it. Quite to the contrary, I think the media industry is arrogant (and thinks consumers are stupid!) if they believe they can sell us the same crap that was "Digital Rights Management" as "Digital Consumer Enablement" now and get us to buy it.

Here is the simple reason why I completely stopped buying mp3's online: For about the same price, I can buy a CD, and play it on every CD player in my home and car (and rip it, to copy onto my own Pocket PC and listen to it) AND have a backup. Try that with music purchased online ...

I applaud steps like the one recently announced by EMI, to distribute music DRM-free through the iTunes store.

DRM or whatever creative names it is being called in the future by the industry is a cul de sac, and helps piracy rather than to prevent it. Instead of buying DRM free content, people go the piracy route in order to enable themselves to actually listen to music on the devise they want.

I realize my comments focused on music, but I believe they are in similar ways applicable to other media.
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-19-2007, 06:44 AM
k1darkknight
Intellectual
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 142
Send a message via AIM to k1darkknight Send a message via Yahoo to k1darkknight

If it looks like a lawyer, acts like a lawyer, but sounds like a politician...it's probably a politician.


Or an RIAA/MPAA spokesperson.


Or all of the above.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:53 PM.