Windows Phone Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!


Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Android Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > WINDOWS PHONE THOUGHTS > Windows Phone Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-31-2006, 09:00 PM
Janak Parekh
Editor Emeritus
Janak Parekh's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 15,171
Default Pathetic!

Last night, I had to set up a Palm T|X for my mom. (She was a happy Pocket PC user, but the hospital she's working at has deployed some Palm-based solution to manage patients, so she doesn't have much of a choice, and would prefer to carry one PDA instead of two.) While I was setting up the Palm, I rapidly saw all the pathetic aspects of PalmOS I forgot having to deal with: 15 categories, proprietary file system, no omnipresent Start menu (or multitasking), primitive SIP, and so on.

However, the Palm blows the Pocket PC away in one very simple scenario: when I finished, my mom pointed out she didn't have an extra sync cable, and would prefer not to carry the cable back and forth. There were two solutions: either buy a new cable, or set up wireless sync. I told her the latter should work, and proceeded to set up WiFi sync, on the latest Palm, in about 30 seconds. It just worked, and was just as fast as the USB sync. I couldn't help but think that the i-mate JasJar or the Palm 700w I own, two of the most advanced handheld computers on the market, can't accomplish this simple task. Meanwhile, a rapidly-outdating device with a rapidly-outdating and possibly-dead operating system has consistently supported network sync for the last 10 or so years and still does perfectly, whereas Microsoft developed a halfhearted implementation that was a pain to set up and then proceeded to ditch it. Sorry, I know we've been down this road before many times, but I can't help but rant after having seen how an utterly primitive handheld trumps the Pocket PC in this simple and useful scenario. Pathetic!
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-31-2006, 09:19 PM
Silver5
Intellectual
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 181

I never really tried the Wifi sync that so many people lament the loss of with WM5. I have always synchronized my PPCs using bluetooth. In fact, after the initial ActiveSync with the computer during setup, I usually put the USB cable either in the car or back in the box the device came in. I leave it in the car as a car charger or in the box because I won't be using it with the computer or anywhere else.
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-31-2006, 09:47 PM
volwrath
Ponderer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 63

Another thing is the alarms always work
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-31-2006, 10:04 PM
SHC
Intellectual
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 215

Well I can't get bluetooth to sync either thats assuming when I turn it on it doesn't want to soft reset first!
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-31-2006, 10:09 PM
ScottC
Ponderer
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 58

With so many websites complaining about this one would hope/dream that Microsoft listens to us... Just because they thought some corporate users didn't want this feature should not mean we all get stuck without it.

They really need to bring this back, I miss it, and it is clear many others miss it too.
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-31-2006, 10:28 PM
Paragon
Magi
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,341
Default Re: Pathetic!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janak Parekh
Sorry, I know we've been down this road before many times, but I can't help but rant after having seen how an utterly primitive handheld trumps the Pocket PC in this simple and useful scenario. Pathetic!
One word....AGREED!
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-31-2006, 10:51 PM
Janak Parekh
Editor Emeritus
Janak Parekh's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 15,171

Quote:
Originally Posted by Silver5
I never really tried the Wifi sync that so many people lament the loss of with WM5. I have always synchronized my PPCs using bluetooth.
I use Bluetooth with the 700w as well. However, it's not nearly as nice as the WiFi syncing experience. It's significantly slower and less reliable; I usually have to start Bluetooth syncing twice before it works. It's also less useful for PCs that don't have Bluetooth built-in (e.g., many desktops).

--janak
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-31-2006, 11:28 PM
Ekkie Tepsupornchai
Magi
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,386

Well... I'll make an even broader statement... while I've certainly never looked back since switching from my old Palm V to the Casio EM500 four years ago, I will say that HotSync NEVER gave me ANY issues at all. It was completely seamless, very easy, and it just worked. So it wouldn't surprise me at all that the wireless syncing is the same.
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-01-2006, 01:32 AM
Silver5
Intellectual
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 181

[quote="Janak Parekh"]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silver5
It's also less useful for PCs that don't have Bluetooth built-in (e.g., many desktops).

--janak
Good point...I sometimes forget that most people are using desktops. Everyone I know has a laptop and almost all of them have built-in bluetooth.
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-01-2006, 03:46 AM
Janak Parekh
Editor Emeritus
Janak Parekh's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 15,171

Quote:
Originally Posted by Silver5
Good point...I sometimes forget that most people are using desktops. Everyone I know has a laptop and almost all of them have built-in bluetooth.
Laptops are quite prevalent today; I have a Powerbook with integrated Bluetooth. In fact, my mom uses a laptop, but hers is a bit older and lacks that integrated Bluetooth functionality.

--janak
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:07 PM.