Windows Phone Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!


Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Android Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > WINDOWS PHONE THOUGHTS > Windows Phone Articles & Resources

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-07-2006, 11:00 PM
Raphael Salgado
Thinker
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 349
Send a message via ICQ to Raphael Salgado Send a message via AIM to Raphael Salgado Send a message via MSN to Raphael Salgado Send a message via Yahoo to Raphael Salgado
Default Reuters: "Mobile Phone Spam Is Here To Stay"

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,175...,1932794,00.asp

"Fumi Ishii has changed her mobile phone e-mail address several times and once spent a month tracking down her tormentor, but the spam keeps coming. "I found the sender's contact information after a lot of research, and I called them up and complained," said the 57-year old print firm owner. "They started up again, but this time I can't figure out where it's coming from." Spam, or electronic junk mail, typically offering dating services, pornography and get-rich schemes, has moved beyond traditional e-mail and into text-messaging and mobile e-mail."



While our technology evolves to make cyberspace as intimate, accessible, and as portable as we can, we cannot forget the lesser evils such as spam that continues to evolve as well. As insult to injury, mobile spam can actually be very costly, whether in the form of an SMS or by additional bandwidth used in downloading these junky e-mails. Are you dealing with mobile spam already? Does anyone have ideas on how to stop the madness? :evil:
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-07-2006, 11:15 PM
Jacob
Pontificator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,162

Even though I had text messaging disabled on my account, I got a few spam text messages. Verizon said that some people had found a loophole to get into the system and send some text messages - even to those like me who had it disabled on their account.

Frankly, I don't see spam ever going away unless the cost of the message is high enough.
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-07-2006, 11:26 PM
Darius Wey
Developer & Designer, News Editor Emeritus
Darius Wey's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,959

SMS spam is relatively rare here in Australia - at least, as far as I'm aware. On top of that, we don't pay to receive SMS (unlike some countries), so fortunately, there are no monetary costs involved.
__________________
Want the latest news, views, rants and raves? Visit our portal. Wish to contact me? Send me a private message or e-mail.
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-07-2006, 11:31 PM
Rod3
Intellectual
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 218

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jacob
Even though I had text messaging disabled on my account, I got a few spam text messages. Verizon said that some people had found a loophole to get into the system and send some text messages - even to those like me who had it disabled on their account.

Frankly, I don't see spam ever going away unless the cost of the message is high enough.
Do you have to pay for the spam? I have Verizon, and didn't know you could disable text messaging. That's a great idea.
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-07-2006, 11:39 PM
Jacob
Pontificator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,162

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rod3
Do you have to pay for the spam? I have Verizon, and didn't know you could disable text messaging. That's a great idea.
I didn't have to pay for it after I called to complain. It wasn't a HUGE deal since I only got maybe 3 at the most over a period of three weeks. Since to receive is $0.02/message it wouldn't have exactly broken the bank. Still, as a matter of principle I shouldn't have to pay.

I don't have verizon anymore, but I had seen the ability to remove that as a supported feature and whether it did anything, I'm not sure. When I called, they acknowledged that it was disabled on my account.

I'd suggest calling their customer service to check it out. Unless my belief that I had it disabled was wrong and the service rep just allowed me to think that then I'm pretty sure it can be done.
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-07-2006, 11:51 PM
Rod3
Intellectual
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 218

Thanks for your response, Jacob. I'll call them first thing tomorrow.
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-08-2006, 01:22 AM
Duncan
Pontificator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,468

Quote:
Originally Posted by Darius Wey
SMS spam is relatively rare here in Australia - at least, as far as I'm aware. On top of that, we don't pay to receive SMS (unlike some countries), so fortunately, there are no monetary costs involved.
I've never understood that one - why on earth would any company make someone pay for receiving an SMS? They wouldn't think of charging someone to receive a phone call after all...
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-08-2006, 01:45 AM
Mark Kenepp
Thinker
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 444

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duncan
I've never understood that one - why on earth would any company make someone pay for receiving an SMS? They wouldn't think of charging someone to receive a phone call after all...
In the US, airtime charges are just that, airtime. It does not matter if the time is spent on a call that was made or a call that was received.

Landlines are different. It costs nothing to receive a call, unless you are an 800 number, and only costs to make a call if it is considered Long Distance.

When I was in Germany, back in 1989, I was surprised that I was going to be charged to make a local call.
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-08-2006, 01:54 AM
Duncan
Pontificator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,468

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Kenepp
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duncan
I've never understood that one - why on earth would any company make someone pay for receiving an SMS? They wouldn't think of charging someone to receive a phone call after all...
In the US, airtime charges are just that, airtime. It does not matter if the time is spent on a call that was made or a call that was received.
That's just silly...! I always thought it a universal principal that only the initiator of a communication - whether it be phone call, SMS or letter - shoul be charged. What if you get called/sms'ed by telemarketers? Or just by people you don't particularly want to talk to?
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-08-2006, 04:23 AM
SteveHoward999
Pontificator
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,183

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duncan

That's just silly...! I always thought it a universal principal that only the initiator of a communication - whether it be phone call, SMS or letter - shoul be charged. What if you get called/sms'ed by telemarketers? Or just by people you don't particularly want to talk to?
Yup - but amazingly it seems that litigation-crazy America has managed to let it's cell phone providers shaft them every which-way ... out-dated devices, high charges, paying to recieve calls, receive text and other messages, get locked into contracts ... you name it, the cell companies here have the scam sewn up. It's refreshing ... I even found myself thinking that the British cell phone companies have us Brits coddled and treated fairly ... really, it's that bad here in the US!!!
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:16 PM.