Windows Phone Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!


Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Android Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > WINDOWS PHONE THOUGHTS > Windows Phone News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-03-2005, 03:00 AM
Jonathon Watkins
Swami
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,303
Default IDC Umpires the Microdrive vs. Flash Memory Fight

http://brighthand.com/article/IDC_C...icrodrives_NAND

"Everyone has heard of Palm's LifeDrive, which has a built-in 4 GB microdrive, but many other handhelds and smartphones with gigabytes of internal storage are in development. And not every company is taking Palm's route. HTC is reportedly working on a Windows Mobile phone with 4 GB of Flash memory. . . Currently, many companies are putting microdrives in their mobile devices because it's the less expensive option. However this may change, as IDC expects that the average selling price for flash memory will decrease at a 43 percent compound annual growth rate from 2004 to 2009. . . Factors such as total capacity requirements, form-factor, power consumption, weight, durability, data rates, as well as strategic OEM and storage supplier alliances, weigh heavily."

ITC go out on a limb to predict that both mini hard drives and flash memory will still be available in 2008. Gosh. Who would have thought it? You can buy the full report here and remember, if you have to ask the cost, you can't afford it. By the way, IDC's report is called "A Hard Choice That Won't be Made in a Flash: HDD Versus NAND". Very punny. :wink: Personally I would not buy a standalone microdive as Flash cards are large and cheap enough. However I would not actively avoid devices that had internal microdrives. How about you guys?
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-03-2005, 04:15 AM
johnm
Ponderer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 108

Well for me it is a pretty obvious choice. I'm on my 3rd Hitachi microdrive in 2 years. Each of the previous 2 have failed in less than 10 months of 'my' normal use. I'll avoid these things like the plague from now on. I only have the 3rd because it was replaced on warranty. These things are just not designed to be used under anything but the lightest conditions. In fact just keeping power on them all the time (such as keeping your pocketPC in the dock 8 hours a day) will slowly kill it. I'm so scared of my new one, I'm keeping my CF slot powered off (registry trick) when I'm not using it.

I will never buy another microdrive. The thought of having one built in where it can't easily be replaced gives me the chills. Flash all the way from here on out.
__________________
I use Remote Conductor for iPad!
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-03-2005, 06:46 AM
pocketpcadmirer
Sage
pocketpcadmirer's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 805

Hi johnm !! I really do feel sorry to hear your sad story.

I dont know why external micro drives are so fragile and error-prone :?:
If apple can use them effectively then why not pocket pc manufactures. Just go in for the apple way of getting them fixed right. Also, to move one step ahead of apple, fix them in ppc in such a manner so that they can be swapped(not hot-swapping), but the nokia way..ie hide it from user but in future if a user wants to upgrade to a better,bigger one, he/she can easily just buy one and install it himself with no tech knowledge.

What do u think guys(and u sir darius,sir janak,sir hansberry) ??

Sunny :idea:
__________________
Windows Phone help
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-03-2005, 09:53 AM
IpaqMan2
Theorist
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 260

I agree with the statement about Apple..if they can do it right than why not a PC OEM.I also like the idea about a swappable micro HDD. It would allow a PPC to be upgraded if the user desired - see how HDD will usually always be cheaper and give more stoarge for the price than flash.
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-03-2005, 10:37 AM
biglouis
Ponderer
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 108

Personally, I'd like the choice but as more manufacturers are producing flash-only expansion slots for their devices hasn't the decision already been made for us?

Thank goodness that mini-SD capacities are already available up to 2GB or we'd all be in trouble by the decision by HTC to make many of the new smartphone devices with mini-SD only.

I find it hard to believe that prices will not fall faster than predicted, btw, unless they are kept artificially high by some kind of (illegal) price fixing by the manufacturers.

LouisB
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-03-2005, 12:06 PM
pocketpcadmirer
Sage
pocketpcadmirer's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 805

Quote:
Originally Posted by biglouis
Personally, I'd like the choice but as more manufacturers are producing flash-only expansion slots for their devices hasn't the decision already been made for us?

Thank goodness that mini-SD capacities are already available up to 2GB or we'd all be in trouble by the decision by HTC to make many of the new smartphone devices with mini-SD only.

I find it hard to believe that prices will not fall faster than predicted, btw, unless they are kept artificially high by some kind of (illegal) price fixing by the manufacturers.

LouisB
Yes I agree to you mate. Take the example of sony's memory stick, which is still expensive when compared to other media like CF, SD, MMC etc.

Sunny
__________________
Windows Phone help
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-03-2005, 02:21 PM
Steve Jordan
Thinker
Steve Jordan's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 455

I'd much rather stick with flash... solid state memory and no moving parts means less power consumption and no risk of a mechanical failure. No question to me.
__________________
Steven Lyle Jordan: Original SF so good, Fox would never put in on the air.
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-03-2005, 04:17 PM
Kursplat
Intellectual
Kursplat's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 158

I, too, lean more towards the flash memory.

Quote:
...as Flash cards are large and cheap enough
Ironically, this story is only two posts on the front page after an article about a $7000 Compact Flash card. So much for the "cheap enough." 8O
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-03-2005, 04:54 PM
Jonathon Watkins
Swami
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,303

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kursplat
Ironically, this story is only two posts on the front page after an article about a $7000 Compact Flash card. So much for the "cheap enough." 8O
Be fair. That's for a 12Gb bleeding edge device. What about the Kingston 4GB CompactFlash Card for $222.50 USD front page post. THAT's cheep enough. :wink:
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-04-2005, 04:07 AM
dangerwit
Intellectual
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 164

Four microdrives in 2 years for me, no dropping, or abuse. Nice idea, but back to the drawing board. Way too power hungry and unreliable.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:23 PM.