Thoughts Media.com

 


Windows Phone Thoughts

Loading feed...

Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Apple Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > Thoughts Media Off Topic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-09-2005, 04:45 AM
Darius Wey
Developer & Designer, News Editor Emeritus
Darius Wey's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,959
Default The Finalizer - Uber Cool BattleBot

http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/...7BattleBot.mspx

"BattleBots, best known for their to-the-death duels on cable TV, have been billed a hit sport among geeks. Tough, remote-controlled robots armed with lethal saws, pulverizers or spears, they are built with one purpose in mind: to destroy an opposing BattleBot. At Microsoft�s biggest annual technology-education conference, The Finalizer made three appearances during a keynote address by Paul Flessner, Microsoft senior vice president for the Windows Server System Division. It even participated in two of the demos."



The Finalizer seems pretty sure of itself, so I'll let it do the talking this time. "I'm the first BattleBot powered by Microsoft technologies. Typical bots work like complex versions of remote control toy cars, consisting basically of a stick controller connecting servos � electro-mechanical devices that move control surfaces according to commands from a receiver. But I have a Pocket PC Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) on board that communicates with a PC over a Wi-Fi network. On the PDA is a pre-release version of the .NET Compact Framework 2.0." Way to go, my friend! :way to go:
__________________
Want the latest news, views, rants and raves? Visit our portal. Wish to contact me? Send me a private message or e-mail.
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-09-2005, 09:53 AM
surur
Mystic
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,734

Quote:
I also have fail safes, so if I lose communication, I�m smart enough to shut myself down. I was built to showcase some intelligent business logic features that can be put into controlling a bot.
Thats not very smart at all. All the opposition would need is a jamming device to disable this robot. How about "I'm smart enough to continue attacking on my own despite losing communication!" Then we would have the beginning of a maniacal robot revolution to take over the world !!! (all powered by MS software of course ) :devilboy:

Surur
__________________
Windows Mobile Power User
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-09-2005, 10:01 AM
langleyt
Neophyte
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 7
Default Robot Wars

To be honest that robot looks like it would last about five seconds against the beasts in Robot Wars (a TV series in Britain that has run for years, but now finished).

Kevlar or tiatnium coated with few protruding features, piercing blades, and compressed air rams capabale of firing that particular robot about 20ft out of the arena.

The best robots were Razer (piercing), Hypondisc (spinning) and Chaos 2 (flipping).
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-09-2005, 12:14 PM
Steven Cedrone
Moderator
Steven Cedrone's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,878

Quote:
Originally Posted by Surur
Thats not very smart at all. All the opposition would need is a jamming device to disable this robot. How about "I'm smart enough to continue attacking on my own despite losing communication!"
True! In the interview with the beast he boasts "I also have fail safes, so if I lose communication, I�m smart enough to shut myself down." As soon as that happened he could be sliced and diced at his opponents leisure! I am with you, it should be "If I lose communication I go berserk and slice at anything that comes near me!" Hehehe! :wink:
__________________
"My eyes are rolling back in my head so far I can see my grey matter bubbling and frothing from reading this thread....bleh." JD
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-09-2005, 02:32 PM
mr_Ray
Intellectual
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 221

Agreed. That wouldn't last 5 seconds against the quality competition in Robot Wars.

Still, this is something that somebody's going to say so I might as well get it out of the way first. Microsoft OS? Glowing blue? Capable of killing? It's the Blue Robot of Death!

I wonder how much of the customisations here will make it into the final release of .NET CF v2? Can we expect to see System.SmashKillDestroy(TargetBot) as part of the managed API?
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-09-2005, 09:03 PM
Jonathan1
Pontificator
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,329

I see that they have added the blue light of death to the thing. It will make any Windows based robots run in fear. 8O
__________________
PDA History: Palm Pilot 5000 -> Apple Newton 2100 -> Casio E-11 -> iPaq 3650 (64MB Upgrade) -> iPaq 3700 -> Casio EM-500 -> HP Jornada 568 -> HP iPaq hx4705 www.spreadfirefox.com
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-09-2005, 09:25 PM
boeman
Pupil
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 31

Quote:
Originally Posted by Surur
Quote:
I also have fail safes, so if I lose communication, I�m smart enough to shut myself down. I was built to showcase some intelligent business logic features that can be put into controlling a bot.
Thats not very smart at all. All the opposition would need is a jamming device to disable this robot. How about "I'm smart enough to continue attacking on my own despite losing communication!" Then we would have the beginning of a maniacal robot revolution to take over the world !!! (all powered by MS software of course ) :devilboy:

Surur
or it could simply use up all the resources on the other robots, then sell it expensive licensing to allow it to continue competing. :twisted:
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-09-2005, 09:46 PM
beq
Oracle
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 899

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Cedrone
Quote:
Originally Posted by Surur
Thats not very smart at all. All the opposition would need is a jamming device to disable this robot. How about "I'm smart enough to continue attacking on my own despite losing communication!"
True! In the interview with the beast he boasts "I also have fail safes, so if I lose communication, I�m smart enough to shut myself down." As soon as that happened he could be sliced and diced at his opponents leisure! I am with you, it should be "If I lose communication I go berserk and slice at anything that comes near me!" Hehehe! :wink:
But then you'd have to instill The Finalizer with a basic core logic of morality (right vs. wrong) to prevent it from running amok. Remember when Data's brain was damaged, his morality subroutine took over...
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-09-2005, 10:12 PM
threedaysdwn
Pupil
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 43

I just love the name.

The Finalizer, running .NET 2.0

teehee
__________________
In pocket:* Sprint PPC-6700In car:** iPaq hx4700
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-10-2005, 10:46 PM
jonathangoodyear
Neophyte
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1
Send a message via MSN to jonathangoodyear
Default Setting the record straight

I'd like to set the record straight with regards to The Finalizer.

1) The Finalizer robot itself was built by Zack Bieber of The Machine Lab (www.themachinelab.com). We was also the creator of the El Diablo and El Diablo Grande BattleBots that appeared on the Comedy Central TV show.

2) My company, ASPSOFT (www.aspsoft.com), ripped out the Futaba control architecture and replaced it with one that uses a combination of a PDA with the .NET Framework v2.0 Beta 2, a Smart Client Windows Forms application built with Visual Studio 2005 Beta 2, and an Xbox controller.

3) Microsoft's involvement with the project was purely financial in nature. We also received some funding from Dundas Software (www.dundas.com). When it became apparent that we were going to succeed in the venture, they approached us about using it at the Tech Ed keynote (which we happily agreed to)...That lead to the reasoning for #4 and #5 below.

4) I specifically instructed Zack to emphasize the "show" quality of the robot. That is why it has exposed tank treads instead of covered solid wheels, etched clear lexan body panels instead of steel or titanium, and an open body style that lights up instead of a closed body. A battle-hardened robot would not have provided the same effect up on stage. The Finalizer's offensive arsenal is official BattleBot quality, though.

5) Since The Finalizer demonstration at Tech Ed was not in an enclosed and protected arena, we felt it was both smart and prudent to build in fail-safes to shut it down if it lost contact with its controller. Obviously, we would give it other behavioral instructions if it were actually competing. Going berserk probably wouldn't have been the best option, considering there were several high level Microsoft executives on stage at the time. Or, maybe it would have (depending on where your technology loyalties lie, I suppose).

6) The Finalizer can also glow red, if you prefer.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright Thoughts Media Inc. 2009