Windows Phone Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!


Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Android Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > WINDOWS PHONE THOUGHTS > Windows Phone News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-13-2005, 11:00 PM
Jonathon Watkins
Swami
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,303
Default Loox 718 Available for Pre-Order

http://www.notebook-eshop.de/shop/i...b241c0049836684

Jorlin at firstloox.org has spotted that the Loox 718 (camera-less Loox 720) is now available for pre-order. The removal of the embedded camera means that the Loox 718 is 20-30 euros cheaper than the Loox 720. How does that sound to you guys? If you are in the market for a VGA PPC, would you prefer the 718 or 720 and why?
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-14-2005, 02:10 AM
marcm
Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 181

Personally, I prefer to have cameras out of my PDA. This would be appealing to me, but: I'm in Canada, not Europe, and I'm holding off from any PDAs until WM2005... If I want a camera, quick, I can just use the camera on my T616 and BT it over to my PPC
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-14-2005, 03:09 AM
gibson042
Thinker
gibson042's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 316
Default Re: Loox 718 Available for Pre-Order

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonathon Watkins
The removal of the embedded camera means that the Loox 718 is 20-30 euros cheaper than the Loox 720.
This is very interesting, and might I say definitive as well. Not only does FSC consider it profitable to offer models both with and without cameras, but they offer the cameraless version at a significant discount (or should that be "offer the camera version at a significant markup" :wink. From my perspective, this legitimizes all complaints about units that only come with a camera (not that the opposite would stop anyone...), because it strongly suggests that manufacturing changes are insignificant in comparison to the cost of the camera hardware. Of course, for the same reason it also legitimizes complaints about units that only come without cameras... the demand for embedded cameras being as high as it is and the costs of variability being as low as they apparently are, there is very little reason to offer a consumer PDA without one.

I apologize in advance for the flamefest that will likely ensue, but I feel this had to be pointed out. Everyone arguing for choice just got a big rhetorical boost.
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-14-2005, 05:27 AM
WyattEarp
Sage
WyattEarp's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 652

I like my PDAs cameraless. I'm in to many places that don't allow cameras. It's good that FSC offer both versions; this way everyone is happy in the end. The choice should always be left to the consumer.
__________________
Making use of mobile tech like no other.
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-14-2005, 07:53 AM
jimski
Philosopher
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 544

I carry a Casio Exilim in my bag where ever I go. No need for a smaller camera and certainly a much better picture that you will get with a PPC CAM. I do bring it into locations when no cameras are allowed, but I would never even consider taking it out of my bag without asking permission. A much better alternative than my client peering into the little lens on the back of a PPC while I am trying to scribble something down.
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-14-2005, 10:05 PM
NLS
Intellectual
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 139
Send a message via MSN to NLS

I understand this product existing for markets that won't allow camera devices. For all the rest, the camera (even though it sux) is a nice bonus for 19 euro.

The real use of such a (bad) camera, is to take a quick pictorial "note" or to add quick photos on your contacts. For this it's invaluable.

(having said that 720 camera sux, I HAVE to say that it DOESN'T, given plenty daylight, steady hand and good distance - I believe the problem is focus -semi hardware issue- plus a pure software issue, that I'd like to see rectified in a firmware update)
__________________
---
NLS
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-17-2005, 10:25 AM
Adrian Knack
Pupil
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 16
Send a message via MSN to Adrian Knack

They should have done this from the start. However I'm very happy with my X50v. Having this model on the market at the time would have just complicated matters for me, it was hard enough with the 4 VGA systems... 8O
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-18-2005, 02:36 AM
Jonathon Watkins
Swami
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,303

Quote:
Originally Posted by Adrian Knack
They should have done this from the start. However I'm very happy with my X50v. Having this model on the market at the time would have just complicated matters for me, it was hard enough with the 4 VGA systems... 8O
Agreed, but we'll soon see more VGA devices. Choice - we Love it! 8)
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:47 PM.