Windows Phone Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!


Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Android Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > WINDOWS PHONE THOUGHTS > Windows Phone Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-07-2005, 02:00 PM
Ed Hansberry
Contributing Editor Emeritus
Ed Hansberry's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,228
Default CompactFlash 3.0 Spec Promises Speeds Up To 66MB/sec

http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000047026347/

The new CF 3.0 spec will allow transfer speeds in the range of 16MB/sec-66MB/sec, up to four times faster than the current 2.1 spec. On top of that it will support Ultra DMA 33 and Ultra DMA 66 interfaces which should help manage power consumption during transfers. I suspect new cards with the 3.0 spec will work in existing CF devices, but at the current 2.1 speeds. You'll need a new device that complies with the new spec to get those speeds.
__________________
text sig
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-07-2005, 02:12 PM
surur
Mystic
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,734

But I thought cf was dead? :?

Surur
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-07-2005, 02:28 PM
Jonathon Watkins
Swami
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,303

Quote:
Originally Posted by Surur
But I thought cf was dead? :?
:lol: Who told you that? CF have always been and probably will remain faster and offer greater capacity than SD cards etc.

I don't see high end cameras changing from CF cards any time soon and I for one will want a CF slot on my PPC for a long time to come. Large capacity cheep media cards? Yes please. :mrgreen:

Remember, the holy trinity of media cards is CF, SD and MiniSD. :wink:
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-07-2005, 02:49 PM
surur
Mystic
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,734

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonathon Watkins
Quote:
Originally Posted by Surur
But I thought cf was dead? :?
:lol: Who told you that?
It was SeanH and Loudmouth. You mean they were wrong ? 8O

:lol:

Surur
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-07-2005, 02:57 PM
jonathanchoo
Theorist
jonathanchoo's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 258

Since when has miniSD been called the holy trinity of flash memory?
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-07-2005, 03:33 PM
surur
Mystic
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,734

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonathon Watkins
Remember, the holy trinity of media cards is CF, SD and MiniSD. :wink:
And the Satan called Memory Stick :twisted:

Surur
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-07-2005, 05:08 PM
Jonathon Watkins
Swami
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,303

Quote:
Originally Posted by jonathanchoo
Since when has miniSD been called the holy trinity of flash memory?
Well, the timestamp of my message is 6:28 am and it's now 7.08, so I would say it's been called that for 40 minutes. :wink:

I've said it generally a few times before though. Why would you want anything other than these three? I'm actively avoiding buying anything that doesn't have one or more of these slots.
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-07-2005, 05:46 PM
jonathanchoo
Theorist
jonathanchoo's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 258

Personally I would avoid miniSD as well.

Just because it has the 'SD' on the front, to me its just another memory card format with less device supporting it than even Memory Stick or XD.

Anyway my 2Gb Sandisk Ultra-II SD card is due to arrive anytime soon!
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-07-2005, 06:09 PM
davea0511
Intellectual
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 146

Quote:
Originally Posted by Surur
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonathon Watkins
Remember, the holy trinity of media cards is CF, SD and MiniSD. :wink:
And the Satan called Memory Stick :twisted:

Surur
he he he he
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-07-2005, 07:05 PM
davea0511
Intellectual
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 146

66 MB/s - IT'S ABOUT TIME! Of course it will probably be another 3 years before these devices hit the shelves. I'm not sure why Sandisk is dragging their feet on this - all they have to do is mux out the data so they can do more simultaneous writes. It must be the cost of on-board SRAM cache needed to do this that's keeping them from increasing the speeds right now.

With 66MB/s soon solid-state DV digicams will start becoming a reality. Then you'll see SNDK go to the moon (I've already made a load of $ from them - best stock I've ever owned).

This will also make having powererful solid state desktops and laptops a reality.

It also makes ipaqgeek's proposed CoreDump-FlashROM technology very doable (see http://www.pocketpcthoughts.com/foru...c&start=71 what he original called "Shadow ROM"). CoreDump-FlashROM is a technology that could give RAM amazing properties like non-volatility and low-power (Intel, AMD, Micron, etc have been investing billions, unsucessfully, into developing a economically viable memory with the same properties that ipaqgeek's solution could enable by using standard semiconductor processing).
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:47 PM.