Windows Phone Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!


Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Android Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > WINDOWS PHONE THOUGHTS > Windows Phone Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-31-2004, 05:00 PM
Janak Parekh
Editor Emeritus
Janak Parekh's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 15,171
Default Freepaq Reviews Battery "Activator" -- Hoax Or Real Solution?

http://www.freepaq.com/index.php?re....php?testid=159

"The Batterylife Activator is a Japanese invention (with an international patent pending). This unique innovation has been evaluated and documented by several prestigious institutions and universities (University of Osaka, University of Kobe, SG Telecom S. Korea und NTT Docomo). It enables longer battery life as well as improved regeneration and utilization of the Li-Ion battery. The Batterylife Activator is easy to install and starts working after 5-10 charging cycles. Remove the battery from the phone. Peel the protective foil from the batterylife Activator and attach the Activator to battery. Re-connect the battery to the mobile phone."



The net effect is that this little sticker somehow magically improves battery life. I know what you're already thinking -- this looks like a variation on those useless cellphone booster stickers. Well, the Freepaq reviewers came into this review completely skeptical as well, but the results were surprising... and we've posted on Freepaq before, so I know they're not a fly-by-night bunch. I still find it hard to believe something like this would work, though. Do we have any electrical engineers who could explain why they got the results they did? (By the way, if you want the English translation of the review, click on the English logo in the upper-right-hand corner when you view the article.)
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-31-2004, 05:38 PM
EnsignRam
Pupil
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 38
Default Very interesting results

Very interesting results... One still wonders though, clearly battery technology is falling behind (arguably far behind) the current state of mobile technology; if the results of the battery activator are "so good" then why haven�t the big time battery manufacturers bought out the rights to this patent and incorporated it into their designs?
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-31-2004, 05:44 PM
EnsignRam
Pupil
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 38
Default Another review

Here is another review of the Battery Activator. This time of the laptop version. The results are the same! Significantly improved battery life!

http://www.xtremecomputing.co.uk/review.php?id=116
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-31-2004, 05:53 PM
Janak Parekh
Editor Emeritus
Janak Parekh's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 15,171
Default Re: Another review

Quote:
Originally Posted by EnsignRam
Here is another review of the Battery Activator. This time of the laptop version. The results are the same! Significantly improved battery life!
8O

Here's what I don't get: wouldn't battery manufacturers integrate this into the unit itself if it truly worked like magic? Maybe it has some side effect we don't know of, like decreasing the long-term life of the battery?

--janak
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-31-2004, 06:44 PM
ctitanic
Oracle
ctitanic's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 980
Default Re: Another review

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janak Parekh
Quote:
Originally Posted by EnsignRam
Here is another review of the Battery Activator. This time of the laptop version. The results are the same! Significantly improved battery life!
8O

Here's what I don't get: wouldn't battery manufacturers integrate this into the unit itself if it truly worked like magic? Maybe it has some side effect we don't know of, like decreasing the long-term life of the battery?

--janak
that's my point. I read it in some where about 2 years ago about these devices and the opinion of an elect. eng. about it. According to him all these devices don't work at all. But... who knows.
__________________
Ctitanic
http://www.tweaks2k2.com
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-31-2004, 06:52 PM
rob_ocelot
Ponderer
rob_ocelot's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 109
Default Re: Another review

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janak Parekh
Quote:
Originally Posted by EnsignRam
Here is another review of the Battery Activator. This time of the laptop version. The results are the same! Significantly improved battery life!
8O

Here's what I don't get: wouldn't battery manufacturers integrate this into the unit itself if it truly worked like magic? Maybe it has some side effect we don't know of, like decreasing the long-term life of the battery?

--janak
My vote is that it's bunk, based on my knowledge of battery chemistry.

Li-ion and Li-polymer batteries are sealed in a non-conductive container, so anything on the surface of the container would have to penetrate the gel layer of the battery. This is not what is happening here, nor would you want it to be happening.

So why are they getting 'better' battery life?

All of the tests are done using batteries that are at the end of their life cycle (18 - 24 months), and in that time those batteries have not been touched because they are sealed inside the machine (like the old iPaq batteries) or in a plastic housing (like laptop batteries). What's probably happening is that by putting this metal sticker on the surface of the battery container you are massaging the eletrolyte a bit and shaking things up that have settled. It'll give you a temporary boost in life but in the long run it'll settle back down to what it was before.

I notice none of the tests were done on new batteries, probably because it doesn't do anything to a battery that's fresh out of the factory. You would think a battery-savy company like Mugen would be all over something like this -- their batteries blow away anything you can get from an OEM because they have lower internal resistence (even if you just compare the mAh rating). If something could make new battery life better and keep the manufacturing cost the same they would have done it or be using it.

Some REAL tests to determine if this works:

-Remove the sticker and see if battery life returns to the previous state. I bet you that it doesn't.

-Put a sticker of some other material on the battery using the exact same method (80% coverage) and see if the life increases. I bet you that it does.

This whole thing reminds me of laundry disks and balls they were selling a few years back. They worked, mainly because you have enough residual soap in your clothes that you don't need to add any detergent. Most people aren't even aware. The company explanation was that their product caused some sort of 'ion charged duplicity' in the water making it *super* water. Uh huh, and I hear that all of the moon landings were faked too. It's true because I read it on the internet. 0X

Just because they've patented the product or the design doesn't mean it actually works. The patent office doesn't have time to go through every device and design.
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-31-2004, 07:18 PM
Janak Parekh
Editor Emeritus
Janak Parekh's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 15,171
Default Re: Another review

Quote:
Originally Posted by rob_ocelot
My vote is that it's bunk, based on my knowledge of battery chemistry.
Thanks for the feedback, Rob. It's very helpful.

One last question: how long do you think the "benefit" would last? Are talking days, weeks, months? I'm guessing shorter, but the longer it is the more value such a "sticker" would have.

--janak
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-31-2004, 07:32 PM
JvanEkris
Philosopher
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 574

I was very sceptic as well, so we contacted the manufacturer. We tested 11 of them as well in a simultanious test on different devices all having different age (ranging from 6 months to 3 years old), under different but normal usage conditions. Apperantly the sticker reduces the "dirt" that accumulates during use. According to the manufacturer it therefor only works when the battery is in use for more than six moths. It also implies that the effect is lasting: removing the sticker will not validate it's positive effect.

To our test: we can substantiate that the sticker does effect battery-life significantly. We validated this with SPb benchmark. Unfortunatly for us, it was a negative effect. This could be caused by production errors (the stickers were custom made for the test). The only "production" sticker did have a positive effect.

Jaap
__________________
For getting the most out of Windows Mobile, go to our Windows Mobile WiKi
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-31-2004, 07:42 PM
Jason Dunn
Executive Editor
Jason Dunn's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29,160

I'm pretty dubious myself - I tested one from Martin Fields and saw NO difference in my tests. Also, what the hell kind of laptop can only do 20 minutes of video playback before dying? :roll:
__________________
Want to contact me personally? Use this. Want to read my personal blog? Check it out. Want to follow me on Twitter? Here you go.
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-31-2004, 08:17 PM
Sven Johannsen
Editorial Contributor
Sven Johannsen's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,411

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Dunn
I'm pretty dubious myself - I tested one from Martin Fields and saw NO difference in my tests. Also, what the h-ll kind of laptop can only do 20 minutes of video playback before dying? :roll:
An old one that has spent the majority of it's life plugged into an AC outlet.
__________________
Sometimes you are the anteater, sometimes you are the ant.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:48 PM.