Windows Phone Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!


Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Android Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > WINDOWS PHONE THOUGHTS > Windows Phone Hardware

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-18-2004, 07:00 PM
Ed Hansberry
Contributing Editor Emeritus
Ed Hansberry's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,228
Default Rumors On The iPAQ rw6100

http://www.ipaqabilities.com/iaforums/viewtopic.php?t=281

iPAQabilites has found some pictures of what is rumored to be the iPAQ rw6100, a CDMA Pocket PC Phone. It has a slide-out 10 key touchpad and built in 1.1 megapixel camera.



Other rumored features are WiFi support, 1xRTT, 64MB of RAM, 128MB of ROM which contains WM2003SE. Bluetooth is not included.

Update: More pictures and specs here. Looks like this would be a rebranded LG SC8000, which we posted on earlier. As of this moment, we have no clue if it's coming to North America or not.
__________________
text sig
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-18-2004, 07:06 PM
arebelspy
Theorist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 268
Send a message via AIM to arebelspy

Personally I like the slide out thumb keyboard better than the 10-key (ala MDA III versus this). And what's with HP putting all this ROM in the device? Sure it survives a hard reset but it's much slower and can't be sed to run programs (it's only storage memory, RAM is storage/program memory)..

-arebelspy
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-18-2004, 07:13 PM
brianchris
Philosopher
brianchris's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 533

Nice, but where the heck did this come from? Am I the only one totally surprised by this?

The biggest problem I personally have with the iPaq 6300 is the lack of a built in keypad / thumb-board. I dial a lot and don't want to tap the screen that much. The fact that this has a nice, sliding keypad with big keys is interesting and good (IMO).

Hmm, WiFi but no Bluetooth? Weird. I'd probably rather have Bluetooth than WiFi, but its a tough choice (no one should be forced to choose). Odd that it doesn't have Bluetooth being a phone and all. OHHHH its CDMA....that explains it. I beginning to believe CDMA and Bluetooth are incompatible technologies :wink:
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-18-2004, 07:16 PM
ctitanic
Oracle
ctitanic's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 980

the screen is way to small. I like the idea of having connectivity in my PPC but I hate the idea of having Office software in my phone more when the screen is so small
__________________
Ctitanic
http://www.tweaks2k2.com
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-18-2004, 07:32 PM
burtman007
Pupil
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 31

Quote:
Originally Posted by brianchris
I beginning to believe CDMA and Bluetooth are incompatible technologies :wink:
Funny, Sprint thinks they already figured that out. Of course, Verizon doesn't seem to think so.

http://www.pocketpcthoughts.com/inde...topic_id=31253


I'm so tempted to drop my Sprint service...
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-18-2004, 07:33 PM
jlan5584
Pupil
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 16

anyone else think this is fake? Why would this pocket pc have a number pad when you can do that with software? And if it is real, imagine how long it would be 8O

I do like the idea of a CDMA phone though with wifi
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-18-2004, 07:36 PM
Jonathan1
Pontificator
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,329

It looks too sexy to be an iPaq. Send it back to development for "improvement".
__________________
PDA History: Palm Pilot 5000 -> Apple Newton 2100 -> Casio E-11 -> iPaq 3650 (64MB Upgrade) -> iPaq 3700 -> Casio EM-500 -> HP Jornada 568 -> HP iPaq hx4705 www.spreadfirefox.com
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-18-2004, 07:36 PM
Mojo Jojo
Theorist
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 276
Default ...

(Deep inside the company 'x' design room)

Guy1:"OKay guys, we have to find a way to get a camera in this thing. For every product that has a camera we get a healthy kickback. So how do we make it fit?"

Guy 2:"We could remove the bluetooth chips. No one ever uses that... and put in a smaller battery."

Guy1:"Your a genious Rick!"

Guy2:"Thats Philip sir..."
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-18-2004, 07:36 PM
felixdd
Philosopher
felixdd's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 555
Send a message via ICQ to felixdd Send a message via AIM to felixdd Send a message via MSN to felixdd Send a message via Yahoo to felixdd

CDMA, and no BT. Sorry -- not for me.

In any case, this doesn't really agree with the design philosophy of the new line, nor the immediately previous line. It looks more like a Samsung (especially the blue button in the middle of a circuilar D-pad).
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-18-2004, 07:36 PM
brianchris
Philosopher
brianchris's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 533

Quote:
Originally Posted by burtman007
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianchris
I beginning to believe CDMA and Bluetooth are incompatible technologies :wink:
Funny, Sprint thinks they already figured that out. Of course, Verizon doesn't seem to think so.

http://www.pocketpcthoughts.com/inde...topic_id=31253


I'm so tempted to drop my Sprint service...
Indeed, Verizon has FINALLY (its the second half of 2004 folks) released a Bluetooth phone. While it took them FOREVER and a day, we must give posative reinforcement when its due.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:59 PM.