Windows Phone Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!


Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Android Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > WINDOWS PHONE THOUGHTS > Windows Phone Articles & Resources

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-29-2004, 12:00 AM
Jonathon Watkins
Swami
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,303
Default PDAGold Compare Performance of WM2003 and WM2003SE

http://www.pdagold.com/articles/detail.asp?a=189

"When Microsoft launched Windows Mobile 2003, the main reason for upgrading was performance boost due to code optimisation. I was curious to find out whether users can expect any performance improvement with an upgrade to Windows Mobile 2003 Second Edition, too. Considered the current (non-)availability of upgrades, this debate may be a little academic. Still, I compared benchmark results for Toshiba e400 before and after the OS upgrade."

Pavel from PDAGold then lists five benchmarks in this brief article about what performance benefits folks can expect when moving from WM2003 to WM2003SE (where the OEMs have made upgrades available). I won't give the results away, but I must say I was a little surprised about what the benchmarks showed. What about you?
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-29-2004, 12:33 AM
ombu
Theorist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 263

Well, seems it's almost the same, so more features (O.K., just a few) don't slow performance.
__________________
MacBook Pro 2.53-250-4. iPhone 3G-8
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-29-2004, 12:37 AM
Myrddin
Ponderer
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 77

I could be totally off base here, but could it be that the benchmarking software isn't totally ready for WM2003SE?
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-29-2004, 12:37 AM
sgyee
Ponderer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 86

Microsoft strikes again with more bloat, or actually, fractional bloat!
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-29-2004, 12:40 AM
Jonathon Watkins
Swami
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,303

Quote:
Originally Posted by Myrddin
I could be totally off base here, but could it be that the benchmarking software isn't totally ready for WM2003SE?
Well, I beleive that SPB do know what they are doing. :wink:

I do think that this shows that as Pavel says, there was no optimisation 'under the hood' of WM2003SE compared to WM2003. Disappointing. :|
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-29-2004, 01:10 AM
maximus
2000 Posts And This is All I Get?
maximus's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,017
Send a message via ICQ to maximus Send a message via MSN to maximus

More feature on the same processor + the same amount of memory = slow down. I think that is only logical.
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-29-2004, 01:12 AM
rugerx
Ponderer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 95

Well this will prolly get deleted by the post police, but I still say HP sucks.

They should have given recent purchasers an upgrade.

This has soured my taste for PPC's beyond belief.

This will probably be my last. Tricked out light weight laptops, or perhaps and OQO type device will be the future for me. Also the last thing I want is a cell phone pda, man I drop my phone so often, lol that would last a week at most.
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-29-2004, 02:32 AM
ricksfiona
Pontificator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,041
Send a message via AIM to ricksfiona

Quote:
Originally Posted by rugerx
Well this will prolly get deleted by the post police, but I still say HP sucks.

They should have given recent purchasers an upgrade.

This has soured my taste for PPC's beyond belief.

This will probably be my last. Tricked out light weight laptops, or perhaps and OQO type device will be the future for me. Also the last thing I want is a cell phone pda, man I drop my phone so often, lol that would last a week at most.
I had a really good long reply to this post... But then I decided it wasn't worth it.
__________________
Rick Gomez - Owner/Consultant
fiona Systems Integration
www.fionasystems.com
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-29-2004, 03:37 AM
Janak Parekh
Editor Emeritus
Janak Parekh's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 15,171

Quote:
Originally Posted by rugerx
Well this will prolly get deleted by the post police, but I still say HP sucks.
Why would the moderators delete it? The only thing they might do is to split the thread.

Quote:
This will probably be my last. Tricked out light weight laptops, or perhaps and OQO type device will be the future for me. Also the last thing I want is a cell phone pda, man I drop my phone so often, lol that would last a week at most.
Well, good luck with whatever you find!

Anyway, back ontopic: SE might not be slower, but it does certainly feel a bit slower in VGA. Of course, that might be because it's moving more pixels around. And it is most definitely much slower rebooting, at least on my e805.

--janak
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-29-2004, 04:25 AM
ucfgrad93
Intellectual
ucfgrad93's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 251

Quote:
Originally Posted by rugerx
Well this will prolly get deleted by the post police, but I still say HP sucks.

They should have given recent purchasers an upgrade.

This has soured my taste for PPC's beyond belief.

This will probably be my last. Tricked out light weight laptops, or perhaps and OQO type device will be the future for me. Also the last thing I want is a cell phone pda, man I drop my phone so often, lol that would last a week at most.
Uh, thanks for staying on topic! :roll:

I have to say, I was surprised at how close the results were. I venture to say that most people won't notice the difference.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:00 PM.