07-25-2004, 12:50 AM
|
|
Executive Editor
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29,160
|
|
All New HP Specs Posted to HP Site
As a quick update to Janak's previous post, ipaqHQ has links to all of the new devices:
� HP iPAQ hx4700 series Pocket PC
� HP iPAQ Pocket PC h6300 Series
� HP iPAQ rx3100 series Mobile Media Companion
� HP iPAQ rx3700 series Mobile Media Companion
� HP iPAQ rx3400 series Mobile Media Companion
� HP iPAQ rz1715 Mobile Media Companion
� HP iPAQ rz1700 series Pocket PC
I'll say this much: HP is making a splash with sheer volume if nothing else!
|
| |
|
|
|
07-25-2004, 01:13 AM
|
|
Sage
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 634
|
|
I was all pumped up about the new 6315 until I saw the specs. I was hoping for VGA and 128 MB of SDRAM. Also, what's the deal with the TI OMAP processor? It only runs at 200 mhz. I'm not a techie, but it seems to me that I would rather have the Intel processor that's in the 4715 that runs at 624 mhz. I do like the quad band aspect of the device though.
|
| |
|
|
|
07-25-2004, 01:34 AM
|
|
Executive Editor
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29,160
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by piperpilot
I was all pumped up about the new 6315 until I saw the specs. I was hoping for VGA and 128 MB of SDRAM. Also, what's the deal with the TI OMAP processor? It only runs at 200 mhz. I'm not a techie, but it seems to me that I would rather have the Intel processor that's in the 4715 that runs at 624 mhz. I do like the quad band aspect of the device though.
|
HP made a purposeful decision there to go for something that was designed for mobile communications and long battery life, not a powerful multimedia machine. I think they made the right choice, although of course we'd all like to have a Pocket PC that does EVERYTHING well. The TI OMAP is a fairly powerful processor however, so don't let the low speed fool you...although until I get a unit to test, I can't say anything definitively. :-)
|
| |
|
|
|
07-25-2004, 02:47 AM
|
|
Pontificator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,468
|
|
Quote:
|
HP made a purposeful decision there to go for something that was designed for mobile communications and long battery life, not a powerful multimedia machine.
|
Absolutely - people that want GPRS built-in (of which I am not one - despite having liked my XDA II) tend to value the Pocket PC as a powerful communications device. Since I doubt that the TI OMAP is any (or at least not much) slower than the PXA263 400Mhz in practical terms - I reckon HP have made the right decision.
Whilst I have no interest in a GPRS Pocket PC at this time I have to say that this is the real star of the new iPAQs. A well thought out and attractive device (contrast with the unspectacular mid range newbies and frankly bizarre choices made with the hx4700).
If I were a betting man I would guess that the h6300 came from the design team behind the h221x, h19xx, h4xxx and h5xxx. Then clearly HP fired them and hired the three wise monkeys to design the new lot (any other rational explanation...? :wink: )
Real pity about the hx4700. For a while I lusted after it (I love the idea of the touchpad, and 624Mhz is something to savour - along with a magnesium casing...) - then - no USB hosting, only 64MB RAM (I don't object to the idea of an 80MB ROM store - love the idea - but it should be partnered with 128MB RAM), FastIR (why? I thought it was silly in the Loox 610, I find it even more silly in a high end iPAQ - they have access to Nevo for heavens sake - CIR should be a given...! :roll: ).
Just a few *sensible* differences and HP would have had a customer from me - instead I see an overweight, oddly configured 'should've been'.
But - at least the h6300 will shine...!
|
| |
|
|
|
07-25-2004, 03:27 AM
|
|
Pontificator
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,055
|
|
I can't wait to play with these devices in person. HP is definitely taking a very bold move with the launch of these new PDAs. I guess we'll have to wait and see if they become blockbuster models.
|
| |
|
|
|
07-25-2004, 04:38 AM
|
|
Oracle
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 830
|
|
These new devices will seal the deal for windows mobile. Pocket pc will overtake palm with the slew from HP, Asus and Fujitsu
|
| |
|
|
|
07-25-2004, 04:53 AM
|
|
Pontificator
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,055
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ARNAGE2
These new devices will seal the deal for windows mobile. Pocket pc will overtake palm with the slew from HP, Asus and Fujitsu
|
Sorry, but I have to disagree. I think these two models are way too expensive for most PDA users. In fact, I think the Palm OS may actually gain marketshare compared to these new devices. I also think that Dell will overtake HP in Pocket PC marketshare within the next year. These predictions are not based on any solid facts, but I think these devices are too expensive for what they offer.
|
| |
|
|
|
07-25-2004, 05:13 AM
|
|
Intellectual
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 137
|
|
As speculated on previous spec sheets, the 4705 is impressive. I am, however, dissapointed in the IR in terms of location and lack of CIR implementation. It's not a deal breaker by any means.
The only other PDA that's in the running is the Loox 720. I'm ready to give up my Tosh e550G and one of these is going to replace it. It's neck and neck for either device but I have a very strong feeling the Loox will never make it over State side which leaves the HP alone at the top. I would like an all-in-one with lots of horsepower but the ones that are set to launch (MPx & MDA III), I still feel that it's not quite there yet esecially when it comes to battery power.
I'll take a look at the local retail stores Monday to see if they have the 4705 armed with some 640x480 video clips! It's always different when you have the device in your hand compared to the endless images you find online.
|
| |
|
|
|
07-25-2004, 05:15 AM
|
|
5000+ Posts? I Should OWN This Site!
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,133
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Stake
As speculated on previous spec sheets, the 4705 is impressive. I am, however, dissapointed in the IR in terms of location and lack of CIR implementation. It's not a deal breaker by any means.
The only other PDA that's in the running is the Loox 720. I'm ready to give up my Tosh e550G and one of these is going to replace it. It's neck and neck for either device but I have a very strong feeling the Loox will never make it over State side which leaves the HP alone at the top. I would like an all-in-one with lots of horsepower but the ones that are set to launch (MPx & MDA III), I still feel that it's not quite there yet esecially when it comes to battery power.
|
What about the Asus?
|
| |
|
|
|
07-25-2004, 05:52 AM
|
|
Intellectual
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 137
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kati Compton
What about the Asus?
|
I would consider it but on paper, the Loox has a little more like file store size, BT 1.2 and battery capacity. However little the differences are, they may make a difference in the end. I err on the side with the best specs without actually seeing or testing them. Also, not having Bluetooth 1.2 kinda kills it for me. Why have the older technology if everyone else is producing a device with the new spec?
The real test is going to side by side comparisons, of couse. That's if they can pass the availability test in the US.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
