07-05-2004, 12:00 AM
|
|
Swami
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,303
|
|
Pocketnow Reviews XCPUScalar
Tim Adams over at Pocketnow has taken a closer look at XCPUScalar, the over/under-clocking utility by Immiersoft. The review is just what you would hope for with plenty of screenshots and benchmarks. Overall, on balance, taking all factors into consideration, I'd say that Tim like the program :wink: :
"If you are using a 400MHz Pocket PC - XCPUScalar is a must have. Not only can you get increased speed out of your unit, but you can also extend the battery life by downscaling the CPU. And for the price of $14.50 - what a steal. I've used XCPUScalar since version 2.5 (from July 2003) - as you can see from reading my prior reviews - and have had nothing but good things to say about it."
I'd have to agree with that sentiment. I bought XCPUScalar last year and have been very happy with it. Yes I know there are free alternatives, but having used them for while, I still found it worthwhile switching to it. If you're thinking of the best way to get that extra bit of oomph out of your PPC, then it's worth your while to see what Pocketnow think of XCPUScalar. And hey, any review that starts with a quote from Spaceballs has to be worth a look, hasn't it? :wink:
|
| |
|
|
|
07-05-2004, 06:05 AM
|
|
Oracle
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 830
|
|
i hope they release this for pxa263 ppcs soon. Imagine a 700mhz+ ppc 
|
| |
|
|
|
07-05-2004, 02:14 PM
|
|
Swami
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,303
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ARNAGE2
i hope they release this for pxa263 ppcs soon. Imagine a 700mhz+ ppc |
Yup. Looking forward to an updated XPCUScalar soon. I wonder how high the new CPUs can be overclock to? :twisted:
|
| |
|
|
|
07-05-2004, 10:31 PM
|
|
Pupil
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 17
|
|
hi to everybody:
The downclocking to the xscale cpu not necesary give more battery. In fact it only give a 3% +/-. Even more, there are some cases that the downclocking the xscale cause to a less batery charge (?). Why?. Who known?.
|
| |
|
|
|
07-05-2004, 11:23 PM
|
|
Swami
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,303
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Magallanes
Even more, there are some cases that the downclocking the xscale cause to a less batery charge (?). Why?. Who known?.
|
Welcome Magallanes. 8)
I believe the problem is when a low clock speed is used with a high CPU utilisation, i.e. 200mhz at 30% CPU may use less power than 100Mhz and 60% CPU utilisation. As they say, your mileage may vary. :wink:
|
| |
|
|
|
07-05-2004, 11:38 PM
|
|
Thinker
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 350
|
|
Hey, there's a new version out (2.80). Here's the new processors/speeds supported:
"XCPUScalar now has support for all popular frequencies from 100 to 741MHz. PXA250 XScale processors can be scaled upto 500MHz and PXA255, PXA261, PXA262 or PXA263 XScale processors upto 530MHz at 265MHz bus speed and PXA270 processors upto 741MHz"
Found this on PocketGear
|
| |
|
|
|
07-05-2004, 11:47 PM
|
|
Swami
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,303
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by buckyg
Hey, there's a new version out (2.80).
|
Ah - nice. I think that's worth a front page post. 8) Thanks.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
