Quote:
Originally Posted by gorkon280
<FLAME ON>
They better had bring their flame retardent underwear. Activesync sucks. Better be nice? Being nice is what we have been all along...we all better get damn well pissed to let them know that activesynce is a flaming hunk of goo! I am tired of it.
</FLAME OFF>
|
You can go rant if you want, but you probably won't be responded to. You can attract more flies with honey than vinegar. :-D
Quote:
First few things:
When are we goign to get full Mac support...if ever.
|
Probably never. Mac is a very small market. Even Palm has dropped support for it. There are two third party products for it.
Quote:
When are they going to implement SyncML?
|
Probably never. Why would MS use something embraced by Symbian? Symbian is about as likely to start using Activesync. ;-) (Yeah, I know, not the best analogy, but you get the point.)
Quote:
Why have they not implemented this?
|
Implemented what?
Quote:
What is the acepted delivery format of over the air and portable applications?
|
.cab files.
Quote:
Things I am sick of:
No true Mac support
|
Never gonna happen. Look at one of Microsoft's best applications - Access and Project. Both generate more revenue than mobile devices and those aren't on the Mac. Never will be unless the Mac starts growing substantially in marketshare. Sub-4% just isn't worth it.
Quote:
Always having to run EXE's to install apps for the first time
|
I use CAB files all of the time.
Quote:
The calendar app on PocketPC needs major work...
|
Third party. MS is always looking to improve their platform, but ask yourself this. You have X hrs of programming this year. You can work on Pocket Word, a better ActiveSync, rich email, Pocket Excel, Windows Media, Connection Manager and improving Calendar.
I suspect on that list, Calendar would be at or near the bottom. :mrgreen:
|