01-21-2004, 02:00 PM
|
Contributing Editor Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,228
|
|
Possible Picture Of The iPAQ 6000
http://www.smartfone.net/?m=show&id=262
Smartfone.net has a picture of the iPAQ 6000 that we discussed earlier this week. This image is not confirmed and some think it is a fake, but it is interesting anyway and thought you should see it.
Specs include: � Windows Mobile 2003 Pocket PC Phone Edition � The screen is 3.5-inch color Transflective TFT � Multiple wireless options: GSM network 850/900/1800/1900, GPRS, WiFi, Bluetooth� wireless technology � SDIO SD Slot � TI Omap processor 8O � 640x480 VGA Camera (Business Version comes without built-in digital camera) � Add-on thumb keyboard � 64MB RAM /64MB ROM � 1800 mAH battery (removable) � RIM Push Email Software � Available on T-mobile in June � Approximately $600 US
UPDATE: This image is a mock up according to reliable sources at HP.
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2004, 02:16 PM
|
Thinker
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 318
|
|
Ugly! 8O
It must be a fake. Hp would never release something that looks that bad.
Now if this was the size of a 22xx without the keyboard then I'd jump on fast than you could say GSM!
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2004, 02:23 PM
|
Pontificator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,468
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by carphead
Ugly! 8O
It must be a fake. Hp would never release something that looks that bad.
|
It might well be a fake (it's the 'shadows' of buttons on each side that make me wonder) but in terms of looks I'm reminded of comments about the 221x when pictures first appeared - many said it looked ugly and then changed their minds on seeing it in person...
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2004, 02:27 PM
|
Ponderer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 87
|
|
OF course its a fake - but possibly a mock up from something seen and restricked to NDA. Take a look at the keybored extruded grooves... they dont even match - it looks too 3-dimensional. There are too many rough edges, and the keyboard part looks to be raised from the unit itself.
Horrible PS skills. Looks like a fat ugly Treo600. (which is nicer)
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2004, 02:28 PM
|
Theorist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 291
|
|
Argh, I want bigger screen not smaller! :-/
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2004, 02:35 PM
|
Sage
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 713
|
|
Ugh! 8O What an ugly picture to see first thing in the morning. I haven't even had my coffee yet. :morning:
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2004, 02:37 PM
|
Editor Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,981
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheZodiac
.. and the keyboard part looks to be raised from the unit itself.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Hansberry
� Add-on thumb keyboard
|
:wink:
My understanding was that device was based on the 22xx series footprint. So it might not be as bad as everyone thinks.
__________________
"I have no special talents, I am only passionately curious" - Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2004, 02:41 PM
|
Ponderer
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 103
|
|
64MB/64MB assumes Microsoft will not increase the requirements of the next 2 OS revisions, which is an obviously fantasy and not supported by M$'s past performance. So it needs more memory. Also the cost for licensing and integrating the RIM radio technology, etc makes the stated price too low. $850 would be more realistic (it probably just won't move at that price.)
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2004, 02:44 PM
|
Theorist
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 267
|
|
If this is a mock-up and not just a fake, without the keyboard, the footprint could be very similar to the 2200.
|
|
|
|
|
01-21-2004, 02:46 PM
|
Pontificator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,468
|
|
Quote:
64MB/64MB assumes Microsoft will not increase the requirements of the next 2 OS revisions, which is an obviously fantasy and not supported by M$'s past performance.
|
While I agree that 64MB RAM is too little I will say with absolute confidence that WM2004 will fit in less than 32MB ROM and will work just fine in devices with 64MB RAM. As for the next OS after that - no current or upcoming device is going to be guaranteed upgradeable to that...!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|