Thoughts Media.com

 


Windows Phone Thoughts

Loading feed...

Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Apple Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > Thoughts Media Off Topic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-20-2004, 12:00 AM
Jason Dunn
Executive Editor
Jason Dunn's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29,160
Default SimpLite MSN: Instant Messengers, Instant Security

http://www.secway.fr/products/simpl...php?PARAM=us,ie

"SimpLite, the free instant messengers security solution. You are using instant messaging software to chat with your friends or colleagues. Did you know your messages are sent over the Internet in cleartext form? By encrypting messages before they leave your computer to the Internet, SimpLite-MSN prevents eavesdroppers from reading your personal MSN Messenger conversations. As the original successor of Simp 1.0, SimpLite-MSN benefits from state of the art algorithms to secure your messages, whilst maintaining an intuitive interface. SimpLite-MSN is free for a personal use at home or at the office. The only restriction is that only one product from the SimpLite family can be launched at the same time: either SimpLite-MSN, SimpLite-AIM, SimpLite-ICQ or SimpLite-Yahoo!."

Pretty much everyone uses an instant messaging client now, but very few of them are secured - this is a rather innovative program that will help you to secure you IM chats with 2048 bit encryption. The installation is fast and painless, and once you get rid of the very confusing-looking program window, you don't need to look at it again - your chats will be encrypted, assuming both parties are using the encryption tool of course. Worth checking out!
__________________
Want to contact me personally? Use this. Want to read my personal blog? Check it out. Want to follow me on Twitter? Here you go.
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-20-2004, 12:07 AM
corphack
Ponderer
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 103

Quote:
Pretty much everyone uses an instant messaging client now,
but how many use non-auditable IMs in business (such as MSN)?
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-20-2004, 12:08 AM
Jason Dunn
Executive Editor
Jason Dunn's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29,160

Quote:
Originally Posted by corphack
but how many use non-auditable IMs in business (such as MSN)?
I don't understand the question. "Non-auditable" sounds like a corporate term, and I'm just a peon writer. Can you explain it to me in another way?
__________________
Want to contact me personally? Use this. Want to read my personal blog? Check it out. Want to follow me on Twitter? Here you go.
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-20-2004, 12:20 AM
corphack
Ponderer
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 103

"Non-auditable" is "corporate-speak"; since the scandals on Wall Street over the last few years (and especially the one last year involving delayed trading) most of the investment houses and banks have instituted IM products that can be audited, in an attempt to head off legislation. Bloomberg, Sametime, and a few others have added features to permit recording all IM exchanges in the trading environments in the same way that all phone and verbal conversations are routinely recorded and archived. Some (most?) of the investment organizations have also instituted a "no cellphone, no wifi, no bluetooth, etc." policy in the workplace because wireless conversations and emails are not yet auditable. The larger trading organizatons I deal with have formally prohibited Blackberries, 2-way pagers, WiFi Palms & PocketPCs, as well as cellphones from their trading areas to avoid any chance of some form of IM permitting insider trading violations.
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-20-2004, 12:26 AM
Jason Dunn
Executive Editor
Jason Dunn's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29,160

Ah, ok. Sure, that makes sense, but that sounds like the minority of businesses, not the majority, so I think this can still be quite useful to many people, myself included. :-)
__________________
Want to contact me personally? Use this. Want to read my personal blog? Check it out. Want to follow me on Twitter? Here you go.
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-20-2004, 12:33 AM
corphack
Ponderer
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 103

agreed. For individuals and non-regulated businesses. The guys I work with would probably be terrified of an outside encryption that they couldn't get a back door into, in case the SEC came knocking...

I wonder if they are considering a smartphone version. I would start using MSN on my mpx200 if I could encrypt the IMs.
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-20-2004, 02:02 AM
ctmagnus
5000+ Posts? I Should OWN This Site!
ctmagnus's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,616

Kinda nice but one thing concerns me: Regardless if you use a strong alphanumeric password with lowercase, uppercase, digits and punctuation or if you enter aaaaaaaa as your password, the complexity meter progresses the same until you get eight characters entered.
__________________
iPhone 4! ☠☠☠ Mid-2010 15" MacBook Pro! ☠☠☠ Gateway LT2102h! ☠☠☠ Dell XPS M1210!
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-20-2004, 02:51 PM
Jimmy Dodd
Sage
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 713

I'm sure that someone out there is discussing something important using MSN Messenger, but my conversations tend to lean towards the Budweiser "Whassup!!" guys. :roll: Hardly a need for heavy encryption.

I'd be more inclined to use this on my PPC than on my desktop since I tend to use my PPC more often on public access WiFi nets and that seems to be a more "snoopable" situation.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright Thoughts Media Inc. 2009