Windows Phone Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!


Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Android Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > WINDOWS PHONE THOUGHTS > Windows Phone Articles & Resources

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-01-2003, 07:00 PM
Jason Dunn
Executive Editor
Jason Dunn's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29,160
Default Why I miss my Palm III

http://www.pocketfactory.com/archives/000114.html

Foo Fighter has written up a commentary in his site, PocketFactory, that talks about the physical construction of PDAs today. What do you think? Do you agree with him?

"Over the past few years I have shuffled through countless different mobile devices, ranging from Palm, Handspring, Sony, HP, Compaq, Dell...and even a proprietary Casio Pocket Viewer. This has given me a great opportunity to sample not only different software platforms, but also form factors. Lately I have begun to notice a rather unpleasant trend in PDA design. It seems that utility is being sacrificed for glitz. In particular, the materials used in PDA housings have become less friendly to rugged everyday use. For example, the earliest Palm handhelds were simple plastic shells molded in two pieces and in one solid color. Today, most PDAs are painted shells that are prone to chipping, scratching, fingerprints, and give less "grip" when held in the palm of the hand. In addition, I see many PDA vendors abandoning the tried and true flip cover, which offers critical protection to the screen..."
__________________
Want to contact me personally? Use this. Want to read my personal blog? Check it out. Want to follow me on Twitter? Here you go.
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-01-2003, 07:07 PM
JonnoB
Mystic
JonnoB's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,768
Send a message via AIM to JonnoB Send a message via MSN to JonnoB Send a message via Yahoo to JonnoB

In general, I agree with Foo. Palm was ahead of its time with form factor and yet ruggedness. I think that everyone is so cost conscious now that some of the design ideas are put aside to save a few pennies here and there.
__________________
Jonathan (JonnoB)
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." -Edmund Burke
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-01-2003, 07:11 PM
Wasp
Pupil
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 45

I agree totally. At least my HP568 has a flip cover. It has saved my butt numerous times. I keep my pocketPC in my shirt pocket. Sometimes when I am in the shop, I bend over to check something and it falls out of my pocket. I have never damaged my screen and the shop floor is concrete. I had an AMIGO and it hit the corner of my chair from a fall of 18 inches. Totalled the screen. The point is I won't buy a pocket PC without a flip cover; it is too expensive replacing screens. If I am eventually forced to do so, I will want a flip top case that still fits into my shirt pocket. But until an upgrade becomes vital, or my pocket PC fails, I am not upgrading. 8)
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-01-2003, 07:24 PM
trachy
Thinker
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 361

Count me in on this rant too. The first thing I noticed about my iPAQ was just how slippery it is. To this day I'm afraid the thing's going to fly out of my hand whenever I pick it up. They could have made it just as attractive (which I think it is) by adding some kind of notches along the gripping areas.
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-01-2003, 07:24 PM
Foo Fighter
Pontificator
Foo Fighter's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,466
Send a message via MSN to Foo Fighter

You should have given me some warning you were posting this. When I reloaded PPCT's homepage I thought I was hallucinating. :lol:
__________________
Kent Pribbernow
Elitist Snob, Contributing writer for Wired's Cult of Mac
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-01-2003, 07:26 PM
Jason Dunn
Executive Editor
Jason Dunn's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29,160

Quote:
Originally Posted by Foo Fighter
You should have given me some warning you were posting this. When I reloaded PPCT's homepage I thought I was hallucinating. :lol:
Hey, you're "media" now, so you'd better learn to live with it. :lol:
__________________
Want to contact me personally? Use this. Want to read my personal blog? Check it out. Want to follow me on Twitter? Here you go.
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-01-2003, 07:29 PM
Foo Fighter
Pontificator
Foo Fighter's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,466
Send a message via MSN to Foo Fighter

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Dunn
Hey, you're "media" now, so you'd better learn to live with it. :lol:
LOL! Actually I've had one or two of my articles published on ZDNET at one time. And I've been quoted on CNET in a few news stories.
__________________
Kent Pribbernow
Elitist Snob, Contributing writer for Wired's Cult of Mac
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-01-2003, 07:33 PM
Prevost
Thinker
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 461

Something I will miss from my Palm m515 (I know it will be replaced someday) is its metal body. The 2210 fits the hand, that's true, but feels "false" too.

I understand this tendence to flee from metal housings is in order to reduce weight, but for someone like me, who works in an environment harsh for electronics like construction, it is better to give up lightness for body hardness.

In the end, how many people are keeping the handheld in their shirt pockets so as to make weight so critical? I wear it in the belt, but even if you keep it in your hand and with a case, handheld's weight disappears as an issue.
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-01-2003, 07:36 PM
Foo Fighter
Pontificator
Foo Fighter's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,466
Send a message via MSN to Foo Fighter

Glad I'm not alone in my rants. I'm gettting sick of these same damn generic silver painted designs. What agravates me even more is that PDA vendors are designing handhelds in a "one upmanship" manor rather than trying to make something that really is rugged and practical for everyday use. The same thing is happening, in may cases, in the cell phone market. Products are being designed to look pretty on a store shelf without necessarily offering any utilitarian benefit. I see vendors spending too much time trying to compete for consumers eyeballs rather their hands.
__________________
Kent Pribbernow
Elitist Snob, Contributing writer for Wired's Cult of Mac
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-01-2003, 07:38 PM
Foo Fighter
Pontificator
Foo Fighter's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,466
Send a message via MSN to Foo Fighter

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prevost
Something I will miss from my Palm m515 (I know it will be replaced someday) is its metal body.
That's a great point. And you know, if a small startup with just 16 employees like Tapwave can offer handhelds with metal chassis for $299, why can't HP or Dell?
__________________
Kent Pribbernow
Elitist Snob, Contributing writer for Wired's Cult of Mac
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:25 PM.