Windows Phone Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!


Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Android Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > WINDOWS PHONE THOUGHTS > Windows Phone Articles & Resources

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-05-2003, 05:00 PM
Ed Hansberry
Contributing Editor Emeritus
Ed Hansberry's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,228
Default Benchmarks Of Pocket PC 2002 and 2003 iPAQ 3970

http://www.gpspassion.com/fr/articles.asp?id=60

Guillaume has obtained a ROM upgrade for his iPAQ 3970 and has run some benchmark tests comparing the Pocket PC 2002 OS to the new Windows Mobile 2003 for Pocket PC OS. For good measure, he included a 2002 Axim X5 (400MHz) and a new iPAQ 2215.



Overall, there is a 12% increase in the 3970's performance, but if you read the whole article and look at the half-dozen images, you will see where the 3900 series really shines.
__________________
text sig
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-05-2003, 06:25 PM
gpspassion
Intellectual
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 152

Just to clarify, the 2215, 3970 (2k2) and Dell results are from the SPB database.

I think the best news here is that WM2003 really breathes new life into the good ol' iPAQ :lol: When I use my Dell Axim it really feels sluggish now!
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-05-2003, 06:52 PM
Fabulas
Ponderer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 58
Send a message via AIM to Fabulas Send a message via MSN to Fabulas Send a message via Yahoo to Fabulas

That's what I'm talkin' bout! :way to go:
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-05-2003, 07:06 PM
sponge
Philosopher
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 541

Wow the 3970 dominates the 2200 in the Graphics index.. now what does that even test for? Anyone have any PocketQuake benchmarks?
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-05-2003, 07:24 PM
Trokair
Pupil
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 48

I too have manged to get my hands on a ROM update for my 3970, and was quite amazed to find how fast everything is. To put things to the test, I used the good ol' Chrono Trigger/PocketSNES: Bleeding Edge combination, and lo and behold, it ran at 25-30 FPS! Everything certainly feels much snappier.

-Kyle
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-05-2003, 08:08 PM
TawnerX
Intellectual
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 206

So much for the official party line to blame everything on "Intel" chip design, and there is nothing can be done on the OS side.
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-05-2003, 08:19 PM
gpspassion
Intellectual
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 152

Now for the really good news (for GPS fans of course). I'm finding that Intellinav (OEM for Routis, MyNavigator and iGuidance) calculates routes about 5 (yes five) times faster under WM2003 :mrgreen:

I nearly peed my pants when I looked at my stopwatch ;-)
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-05-2003, 08:50 PM
Ed Hansberry
Contributing Editor Emeritus
Ed Hansberry's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,228

Quote:
Originally Posted by gpspassion
I'm finding that Intellinav (OEM for Routis, MyNavigator and iGuidance) calculates routes about 5 (yes five) times faster under WM2003 :mrgreen:
Pocket Backup on a 2003 device backs up 20MB in 2 minutes vs 10-13 on a 2002 device.
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-05-2003, 08:50 PM
Macguy59
Mystic
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,608

I'm not getting the graphics index. From everything else I've read about the 2215, it should have come out on top in this to. Confused :roll:
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-05-2003, 08:56 PM
sponge
Philosopher
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 541

The 2215 uses that damned MediaQ chip, which no one can seem to find a decent use for yet.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:33 PM.