Windows Phone Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!


Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Android Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > WINDOWS PHONE THOUGHTS > Windows Phone News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-19-2003, 11:00 PM
Jason Dunn
Executive Editor
Jason Dunn's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29,160
Default Gateway Plans New Handhelds

http://www.pcworld.com/news/article...n061903X,00.asp

"More details about Gateway's forthcoming personal digital assistant and a new server to be released in August were revealed by executives Tuesday in a phone interview at CeBIT America in New York. The Gateway 100X will be Gateway's first handheld when it is released on Monday with the launch of Microsoft's Pocket PC 2003 operating system, said Mike Stinson, vice president and general manager of mobile products for Gateway. The company considers its PDA a high-end product that it will sell for between $300 and $350, he said.

The Poway, California, company will include both a Compact Flash and a secure digital slot in the PDA, Stinson said. It will come with 32MB of RAM and 32MB of ROM, he said. Information about how much RAM would be user accessible was not immediately available. Gateway will use a 3.5-inch reflective TFT display on the Gateway 100X, with a screen resolution of 320 pixels by 240 pixels, Stinson said. The PDA will also come with a 400MHz XScale processor from Intel, he said."

I want to give Gateway a chance, but I hope the above was a misquote. 8O A "high-end" Pocket PC with 32 MB of RAM and $350? Market research my dear Gateway, market research...
__________________
Want to contact me personally? Use this. Want to read my personal blog? Check it out. Want to follow me on Twitter? Here you go.
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-19-2003, 11:04 PM
mc_03
Ponderer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 81
Send a message via MSN to mc_03

Is it just me, or does "100X" sound very similar to "X5"? :lol:


This sounds a lot like the Axim basic... except for the reflective screen... and it's much more expensive.

Gateway needs to learn the true meaning of high end
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-19-2003, 11:07 PM
etalianstallion
Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 224

Seriously, doesn't seem like they did enough market research. :roll: The "reflective TFT" breaks the deal for me, and at that price, you can bet these won't be flying off the shelves (unless there is some major earthquake). Rather weak and disappointing announcement if you ask me.
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-19-2003, 11:22 PM
Foo Fighter
Pontificator
Foo Fighter's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,466
Send a message via MSN to Foo Fighter

Quote:
Originally Posted by etalianstallion
Seriously, doesn't seem like they did enough market research. :roll: The "reflective TFT" breaks the deal for me.
I wouldn't bet on that display being reflective. Most likely, this is just generalized term be bandied about to the media, or a goof in the printed specs. People at Brighthand that just got the new HP 2215 are reporting that the box says "Reflective" display on side of the box, and Transflective on the other.

Gateway can't be that stupid. If they are, their handheld will quickly be put out to pasture. Sorry for the pun. :jester:
__________________
Kent Pribbernow
Elitist Snob, Contributing writer for Wired's Cult of Mac
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-19-2003, 11:32 PM
Crystal Eitle
Sage
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 739

I'm with everyone else in hoping the "reflective" thing is just a misprint. Why would they stuff a 400 mhz processor into a machine with outdated screen technology?
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-19-2003, 11:33 PM
wu-wei
Neophyte
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 5

This gives me hope for the viability of PPC 2003 on older devices. I presume the newest Gateways would ship with the newest OS (I think I recall reading the same information somewhere around here). If 32 MB is all it takes, then we should be OK.

Obviously updating the OS in a new ROM image will still be at the discretion of the hardware manufacturers, but at least there is some valid basis for optimism (and possibly some leverage for we lowly consumers).
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-19-2003, 11:48 PM
entropy1980
Oracle
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 864

Quote:
Originally Posted by wu-wei
This gives me hope for the viability of PPC 2003 on older devices. I presume the newest Gateways would ship with the newest OS (I think I recall reading the same information somewhere around here). If 32 MB is all it takes, then we should be OK.

Obviously updating the OS in a new ROM image will still be at the discretion of the hardware manufacturers, but at least there is some valid basis for optimism (and possibly some leverage for we lowly consumers).
Our friend Rollie on Dell's Axim board says he still had about the same File Store left after his 2003 upgrade so I don't think it's much bigger than 2002...
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-19-2003, 11:57 PM
ntractv
Philosopher
ntractv's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 497
Send a message via MSN to ntractv

IMHO, if the device does arrive as adverstised with only 32mb of ram, they are already behind the curve ball. Within a few days the new PPC'swill be arriving with 128mb so any new device without, what seems to me the standard 64mb, is foolish. Or maybe they are trying to reach into the Palm devotees who wanna give a swing at the PPC units. Or then again, maybe they are testing the waters to see how the device sells before they commit more $$$$'s

My 2 cents
__________________
HTC Thunderbolt
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-20-2003, 01:02 AM
szamot
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 717

mooooo, I mean booooo 32 and 32 just does not cut it these days anymore, I am sorry.
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-20-2003, 01:36 AM
Mitch D
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 602

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crystal Eitle
I'm with everyone else in hoping the "reflective" thing is just a misprint. Why would they stuff a 400 mhz processor into a machine with outdated screen technology?
Why would they stuff a 400 MHz processor into a machine with 32mb of ram and rom? I was actually looking forward to seeing this unit from them but now I am not even interested if the specs are anywhere near correct.

The 32/32 was the reason I am looking to replace my 3830.

I guess we'll just have to wait till Monday to find out.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:35 PM.