Windows Phone Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!


Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Android Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > WINDOWS PHONE THOUGHTS > Windows Phone Articles & Resources

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-12-2003, 06:30 PM
Jason Dunn
Executive Editor
Jason Dunn's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29,160
Default Why Has 802.11 Flourished and Bluetooth Failed?

http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupd...13885%2C00.html

"The crux of the problem is that 802.11 represents the Internet and Bluetooth represents the faux Internet, and getting to know the difference gives us an understanding of what the Internet really is. On the surface, both promise connectivity without wires. That's really all 802.11 promises.

The Bluetooth story sounds much better. It promises to get rid of that tangle of wires on our desk and it will allow us to have a wireless headset that works with our cellular phone. We can connect our PDAs to our cellular phone and connect to the Internet and we can synchronize our cellular phone with our desktop and on and on. Unfortunately, Bluetooth synchronizes to the desktop only if you are at the desk--and that's the crux of the problem."

Bob sure says "crux" a lot. :lol: This article should spark some interesting debate. I recently installed an Iogear Bluetooth dongle on my desktop PC, then tried to get my iPAQ 5450 to talk to it, and gave up after 30 minutes. The Iogear product is great, and the iPAQ Bluetooth manager seems intuitive, but it's still too hard, still too illogical. Sigh.
__________________
Want to contact me personally? Use this. Want to read my personal blog? Check it out. Want to follow me on Twitter? Here you go.
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-12-2003, 06:36 PM
nobody
Ponderer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 80

Quote:
I recently installed an Iogear Bluetooth dongle on my desktop PC, then tried to get my iPAQ 5450 to talk to it, and gave up after 30 minutes.
Same thing to me. I got a mitsumi usb bluetooth dongle thinking I am all without wire from now on. Bluetooth is still too hard even for die hard techies. Maybe it tries to do too many things at the same time? One good thing at least, I gave up after 2 days. :cry:
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-12-2003, 06:41 PM
pocketpcdude1024
Thinker
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 390

Imagine if PPC2003 has Bluetooth support built-in. For example, in file manager, you could tap & hold and tap "Send via Bluetooth" and select the recieving PPC... THAT would be an awesome use of Bluetooth! Besides, has anyone noticed that the new HP models ALL will have Bluetooth...? :wink:
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-12-2003, 06:45 PM
denivan
Theorist
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 262

Bluetooth is hard, not intu�tive, but once you get it working it's great...it's cool to be able to sync over bluetooth or install apps without having to put my ipaq in the cradle. What I have discovered though is that BT connection between a PDA and a phone seems to work best, everything else is alot harder to set up, even for power users
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-12-2003, 06:47 PM
ricksfiona
Pontificator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,041
Send a message via AIM to ricksfiona

My experiences with Bluetooth have been 50/50. To setup devices to talk with each other can be a test of patience. Being a techie for about 20 years... If it's a pain for me to set this up, I can't imagine for someone who isn't a techie.

The manufacturers need to make it easier for devices to see and talk to each other. Plus the quality of Bluetooth tends to vary greatly as well. I bought a Bluetooth headset for my Bluetooth phone and it worked pretty good for a few months, then the static started coming in and it just became useless.

I have a Belkin USB Bluetooth Adapter and it works great! Install the software, plug in the device and it works! Easy to setup with other devices and the range seems to be very good.
__________________
Rick Gomez - Owner/Consultant
fiona Systems Integration
www.fionasystems.com
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-12-2003, 06:53 PM
James Fee
Mystic
James Fee's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,819
Send a message via AIM to James Fee Send a message via MSN to James Fee Send a message via Yahoo to James Fee Send a message via Skype™ to James Fee

Part of the problem is that Bluetooth makers have yet to really market the technology. I can't tell you how often I have to explain to users what the difference between the two (WiFi and Bluetooth) technologies are.

On a similar note, I spend all last Sunday at my inlaws house trying to get their new deskjet 995c printer which has bluetooth built into it to work with their desktop. Why can't these things be "plug in and play"? :twak:
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-12-2003, 06:56 PM
Ben
Ponderer
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 90

Part of the problem with Bluetooth is that it's designed to work without any sort of base station. Normally when you're connecting wirelessly using 802.11 you're connecting from a client to a base station - the idea of bluetooth is that two individual devices can talk directly to each other without the need for any 'third party'. I know 802.11 can do Ad-hoc mode directly been two cards but my experience of trying to get that to work is simular to what people term 'the bluetooth experince!' (if not worse).
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-12-2003, 06:56 PM
R K
Thinker
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 437
Send a message via ICQ to R K Send a message via AIM to R K

Jason and Nobody: so where have you been having the problems on the BT Dongle?
Have you tried getting any help from forums?
Maybe we can help you out right here.
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-12-2003, 06:56 PM
Johan
Ponderer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 77
Send a message via MSN to Johan

Bluetooth is a bit flakey and not simple enough to use. Tried using an USB bluetooth dongle from Wavelinker with the 5450 and I cna it to connect OK and sync but the connection is flakey and the connection is dropped after a short time. Wonder if Activestink has a hand in this.... :twisted:

Wifi is easy as pie and the connection is stable, it rocks to do some cauch-crusing with Thunderhawk and a wifi connection... :clap:
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-12-2003, 06:59 PM
JonnoB
Mystic
JonnoB's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,768
Send a message via AIM to JonnoB Send a message via MSN to JonnoB Send a message via Yahoo to JonnoB
Default BT

Quote:
Originally Posted by denivan
Bluetooth is hard, not intu�tive, but once you get it working it's great...it's cool to be able to sync over bluetooth or install apps without having to put my ipaq in the cradle. What I have discovered though is that BT connection between a PDA and a phone seems to work best, everything else is alot harder to set up, even for power users
The same thing can be done via WiFi (and it is faster)....

BT is a great concept and because it is low-power, a better suited technology to low-bandwidtch connectivity needs. I suspect however that with communication based technology moving more and more to a packet-switched network based on IP (see mobile carriers like Sprint) that the WiFi concept will eventually surpass BT. Although not designed for it originally, IP can accomplish the same tasks of a PAN and just as easily replace wires.

I suspect in the end, BT and the existing WiFi will be replaced by a hybrid protocol that does both better.
__________________
Jonathan (JonnoB)
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." -Edmund Burke
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:36 PM.