Windows Phone Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!


Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Android Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > WINDOWS PHONE THOUGHTS > Windows Phone Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-28-2003, 12:46 AM
Jason Dunn
Executive Editor
Jason Dunn's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29,160
Default Secure Your Pocket PC with PDA-Protect

http://www.crypto-sign.com/devel/pda-protect.php

"Crypto-Sign� is a patent-pending remote authentication technology based upon the submission of a secret sign. PDA-Protect is a Crypto-Sign based product and has been developed for Pocket PC 2002 device access control. It is used to control the release of the password to enable the device at power-up or whenever a password is required. This means that the Password will not have to be remembered or entered each time it is used and a record of it may be stored in a secure location for access, if needed, to set up an ActiveSync partnership at your workstation. Different Crypto-Sign software can be used to generate/release a key for encryption purposes or to attach an electronic signature to an electronic document."
__________________
Want to contact me personally? Use this. Want to read my personal blog? Check it out. Want to follow me on Twitter? Here you go.
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-28-2003, 12:54 AM
Cracknell
Ponderer
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 85

how does this one work? interesting, but very mysterious.
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-28-2003, 01:25 AM
pocketpcdude1024
Thinker
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 390

I read the quoted material several times, but apparently I don't understand it. Does it secure files, the device, or both? :?

I also went to the link, and it looks like a signature or something that you have to enter and that it checks against a preset signature. Does the Pocket PC really have the processing power to handle an operation like this?
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-28-2003, 01:54 AM
thanos255
Intellectual
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 176

I like my fingerprint scanner. Very easy, always works.
Now I cannot wait for programs to intergrate that function. Like Ewallet etc....

Thanks
Thanos
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-28-2003, 04:18 AM
Jason Dunn
Executive Editor
Jason Dunn's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29,160

Quote:
Originally Posted by pocketpcdude1024
I also went to the link, and it looks like a signature or something that you have to enter and that it checks against a preset signature. Does the Pocket PC really have the processing power to handle an operation like this?
You bet it does! CIC has a similar solution - yoy have to "sign in" to use your Pocket PC. It's very cool actually...works extremely well.
__________________
Want to contact me personally? Use this. Want to read my personal blog? Check it out. Want to follow me on Twitter? Here you go.
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-29-2003, 02:52 PM
RodBeat
Neophyte
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3

Thank you for your comments. The site is still under develoment. In particular, the downlodd/payment system is not yet fully implemented. No charge will be made until the download is enabled.
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-23-2003, 07:20 PM
Kicks
Pupil
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 16

I know I havn't posted here before, but I've lurked a lot since I got my Dell Axim.

I have to say that I've had the privelege of testing out PDA Protect and I think it's awesome so far. It recognizes my secret signature very accurately.

I also like the fact you can change the amount of time required after powering off before it needs your signature to get back in.

The only thing I havn't played with (and probably won't) is the hard-reset after failed attempts option. Not that brave

It's not as secure as the ipaq 5450, but it's just about the next best thing.
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-24-2003, 06:51 PM
Kicks
Pupil
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 16

Hrm, my statement about biometric being more secure may be wrong. Just read through http://www.crypto-sign.com/devel/performance.php and it seems as though they're very close.

Just don't know, but I feel better having a signature on my system than not.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:43 PM.