Thoughts Media.com

 


Windows Phone Thoughts

Loading feed...

Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Apple Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > Thoughts Media Off Topic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-29-2003, 02:00 AM
Jason Dunn
Executive Editor
Jason Dunn's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29,160
Default Media2Go Devices

http://www.winsupersite.com/showcas...2go_preview.asp

"One of two major product announcements Microsoft made at the 2003 Consumer Electronics Show (CES), Microsoft "Media2Go" is a platform for portable media players that will begin shipping from OEMs such as Viewsonic in late 2003. From a practical standpoint, Media2Go is essentially a video iPod, albeit with understandably larger dimensions. The devices themselves were co developed with Microsoft partners such as Intel, which designed the original prototype device, but Microsoft was solely responsible for the software side. In this preview, we'll take a look at Media2Go, both from a platform perspective, and from how it works in everyday use."



Paul Thurrott has put together a brief overview of the forthcoming Media2Go platform from Microsoft - a Windows CE .NET-based device - with a few pictures and description of the device. This is basically Microsoft trying to trump the iPod - but, like so many other Microsoft projects, the success or failure will depend largely on the OEMs. The OS might be perfect for this application, the GUI might be lovely, but if the OEMs build ugly devices with poor performance, Media2Go will flop. I wish Microsoft would just build their own device like this - all their hardware is top-notch in quality, and quite nice to look at too! But it's the Microsoft way to build platforms, not devices - time will tell if this is a successful strategy or not.
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-29-2003, 02:24 AM
pocketpcdude1024
Thinker
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 390

Can anyone spell "FLOP"?

Before MP3 players, there were CD players, walkmans, etc. all of which have been very successful. However, has anyone seen personal video devices that really took off? I'm betting not. The reason? People can be entertained by a personal audio device and still do other things like drive, jog, and even talk. But when you clog the sense of sight with entertainment, you can do none of these things successfully. I'm betting that the initial cost, size, and the distraction factor will keep people away.
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-29-2003, 02:33 AM
Foo Fighter
Pontificator
Foo Fighter's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,466
Send a message via MSN to Foo Fighter

I'm not quite sure where this product fits in with Microsoft's consumer electronics and Mobile strategies? It handles multimedia files and allows consumers to take their favorite media with them on the go. Uh....I thought that ground was already covered by PPC?

This seems like a solution looking for a problem. What's the point? :?
__________________
Kent Pribbernow
Elitist Snob, Contributing writer for Wired's Cult of Mac
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-29-2003, 02:44 AM
toshtoshtosh
Ponderer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 93

gotta agree with Foo here. I don't see where this is going. I do not think there is space for 2 such similar devices (Pocket PC and Media2Go). Is MS attempting to hit some kind of virtual jackpot by trial and error, are they testing the market for something a little bit different that works better?

Very strange indeed.
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-29-2003, 02:51 AM
Brad Adrian
Editor Emeritus
Brad Adrian's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,060
Send a message via AIM to Brad Adrian Send a message via MSN to Brad Adrian

I'd view this more as a proof-of-concept product. I could see a market for a device which would wirelessly download news clips each morning for viewing during a morning commute. I know you can do that with a Pocket PC now, but if this were optimized for that kind of thing, it might attract a certain esoteric following.

It will NOT sell millions, though...
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-29-2003, 02:59 AM
marconelly
Ponderer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 52

Media2Go is very poorly choosen name, IMO. Sounds like one of those dotcom-disaster company names.
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-29-2003, 03:06 AM
Foo Fighter
Pontificator
Foo Fighter's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,466
Send a message via MSN to Foo Fighter

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad Adrian
I'd view this more as a proof-of-concept product....
Yeah, I think you're right. Sort of a "look what we can do!" type of gadget.
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-29-2003, 03:10 AM
rubberdemon
Ponderer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 111

I agree that to a PPC owner this seems redundant. But what might be useful about this device is if the functionality here could be integrated into the next gen pocket PCs. They're talking about screens larger than 320*240, obviously a processor optimized to display full screen full motion video, and built on the next OS. For me this shouts 'better, faster, stronger' ppcs rather than an ipod for video.
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-29-2003, 03:11 AM
toshtoshtosh
Ponderer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 93

Quote:
Originally Posted by marconelly
Media2Go is very poorly choosen name, IMO. Sounds like one of those dotcom-disaster company names.
LOL, exactly. Horrible name .
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-29-2003, 03:17 AM
vincentsiaw
Thinker
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 433
Send a message via ICQ to vincentsiaw Send a message via MSN to vincentsiaw

why would i buy such a device if my pda can perfectly perform this task anyway? :roll:
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright Thoughts Media Inc. 2009