Windows Phone Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!


Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Android Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > WINDOWS PHONE THOUGHTS > Windows Phone News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-17-2002, 10:56 PM
Jason Dunn
Executive Editor
Jason Dunn's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29,160
Default Intel's 1 GB phone

http://www.theregus.com/content/3/26676.html

Interesting article - it's becoming quickly apparent that the amount of storage that future devices will have far outstrips the average ability of someone to fill them. Unless we start thinking outside the box that is - I wonder if with 1 GB on my phone I'd even need a local hard drive for my critical data? Sure, you can fill up 1 GB quickly with music and video, but that's plenty of space for documents. If Bluetooth offered more bandwidth, I could imagine keeping my important documents on my phone and working off it at my desktop PC like it was a local hard drive. Then imagine sitting down at a public terminal and doing the same thing - your data is always with you.

"Intel yesterday announced what it described to us as "a Flash sandwich" - the first 1.8V flash memory allowing four 256 MB modules to be integrated with an XScale to create 1GB of code and data in a phone. That's a lot of memory for a phone. Such phones won't be appearing until later next year, it's safe to assume. Intel has yet to announce a Tier1 design win for XScale, but the StrataFlash package is already sampling with volume production promised for next year."

UPDATE: I was led astray...it's 1 Gigabit, not 1 Gigabyte. 1 Gigabit is 0.125 Gigabytes, or 125 MB. Bah! Boring! :evil:
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-17-2002, 11:13 PM
alexjlee
Neophyte
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2
Default wrong...

thats 1Gb not 1GB
gibabits not bytes.....
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-17-2002, 11:13 PM
WillyG
Intellectual
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 254
Default Re: Intel's 1 GB phone

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Dunn
I could imagine keeping my important documents on my phone and working off it at my desktop PC like it was a local hard drive. Then imagine sitting down at a public terminal and doing the same thing - your data is always with you."
...and finally imagine someone steal it. :wink:

But seriously 8O Thats a lot of storage. But i will not say its to much. Everytime i upgrade my harddrives i keep thinking "im never going to be able to use up this space"
And everytime im mistaken. I thought the same when i came back from the Palm side of the fence, from a 8MB PalmVx (after owning a Casiopeia E10 with 4MB before that) to a 64MB iPAQ, needles to say, i was wrong again.

EDIT: :lol: -> -> 8O -> ops:
But its still not that bad
__________________
In times of change, its the learners who will inherit the earth, while the learned find themselves beautifully equipped to handle a world that no longer exist.
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-17-2002, 11:15 PM
Jason Dunn
Executive Editor
Jason Dunn's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29,160
Default Re: wrong...

Quote:
Originally Posted by alexjlee
thats 1Gb not 1GB
gibabits not bytes.....
DOH! 8O The Register just posted a correction to their article about it being 1 Gigabit...it wasn't there when I posted the article. ops:
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-18-2002, 01:03 AM
vincentsiaw
Thinker
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 433
Send a message via ICQ to vincentsiaw Send a message via MSN to vincentsiaw

i relief it's not 1 gigabyte, if it is i regret buying the ipaq 3900... just to be beaten by a phone..
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-18-2002, 02:50 AM
jlp
Pontificator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,079

since the year 2000 you can store 1 GB of data in a postage stamp-sized Microdrive.

Just take a pocketable CF adapter with you and you can access all your data from any computer equipped with a USB port. And that's on top of your CF slot fitted PocketPC as well.

And Sandisk, SimpleTech and probably others have 1 GB flash CF-I cards too. You can have them from $250 for the Microdrive and from $600 for the flash card.

(And it's most certainly 128 MB and not 125)
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-18-2002, 04:46 AM
Jason Dunn
Executive Editor
Jason Dunn's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29,160

Quote:
Originally Posted by jlp
since the year 2000 you can store 1 GB of data in a postage stamp-sized Microdrive.
That wasn't quite the point. There's a big difference between having 1 GB of built-in memory on a device vs. having it in a storage card. I had a Microdrive. and in addition to be extremely power hungry mine stopped working just after the one year warranty expired. :evil: It was a very cool concept, but ultimately too power hungry and fragile to compete with solid-state memory.
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-18-2002, 06:45 AM
Sslixtis
Thinker
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 400
Send a message via MSN to Sslixtis

ok, so this 125Mb is built into the Xscale right? So wouldn't that mean the in the future, for PDAs we would see atleast 125Mb ROM? That would in turn free up more space for increased RAM. More is better as far as I'm concerned :lol:

I know it says for Phones but that is what the Xscale itself was designed for and it is the defacto PDA CPU now as well, so I don't forsee this going only to phones in the future.

And lastly, why am I NOT surprised that the Register had something wrong in thier article? Is it me or does anyone else feel like they are the National Inquirer of the tech world?
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-18-2002, 06:48 AM
Janak Parekh
Editor Emeritus
Janak Parekh's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 15,171

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sslixtis
ok, so this 125Mb is built into the Xscale right? So wouldn't that mean the in the future, for PDAs we would see atleast 125Mb ROM? That would in turn free up more space for increased RAM. More is better as far as I'm concerned :lol:
Actually, it's almost certain that the flash memory is not physically built into the XScale packaging. It's "integrable" with the XScale as a solution.

But yes, 64MB or 128MB flash ROM's won't be so surprising in the future. Why would it be? Everything keeps on going up, and PDA's aren't anywhere near Moore's law or its friends... yet.

Hardware is not the issue long-term, software is... we've gone through several generations of handheld hardware and PPC has been relatively unchanged to take advantage of said new hardware. (Palm is even worse...)

--bdj
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-18-2002, 01:40 PM
rlobrecht
Thinker
rlobrecht's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 333

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sslixtis
And lastly, why am I NOT surprised that the Register had something wrong in thier article? Is it me or does anyone else feel like they are the National Inquirer of the tech world?
I'm with you on this one. I'm always wondering if their news is news or a spoof.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:01 PM.