Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirk Stephens
I am looking at the Canon S330 right now. Does anybody else have any suggestions or opinions? Thanks
|
The S330 is the improved version of the S300 [or Digital Ixus 300]. I'm a happy owner of one of these since a little more than 1 year.
Hardly any flaws, and the 2 megapixel has always been enough untill now. I bought it because of the size and solid build.
I always carry it with me, on my belt in the official case of about � 30 in The Netherlands [~ $30, certainly worth its price], even in my professional life when I wear a suit. It's gone through a lot, but still works like a charm. It's however just too heavy to wear in a shirt- or jacketpocket at 275 gramms.
Pictures are almost always good, with as a weak point the flash range [issue with all ultra compact cameras]. In time I've been able to learn to work with the limited flash and limited settings to achieve nice results also in special conditions. One rule: just take a few extra pictures when in doubt of the result using diffrent white ballance, light correction or flash settings.
What I really like as a bonus is the waterproof case [30 meters under water] for about � 250, which I use on the beach, sailing and a friend of mine borrowed it for diving.
The S330 [or Digital Ixus 330] is about the same, with essentially some more setting available and a partly other button layout. So if you don't need the extra settings and find a S300 [or digital Ixus 300] for a significant lower price, don't hesitate to buy that one.
At
http://www.megapixel.net/html/issueindex.html and
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/ you can find great reviews of most available cameras [not always the same conclusion to keep it interesting, DPreview often a bit more strict on image quality].
Alternatives in my view:
- Only ultra compacts are small enough to allways take with you wherever you go, because there's nothing more frustrating than to need the camera and having left it at home.
- Always take a camera with at least 3x zoom
- CF-card [if you have a PocketPC] because of cheap memory and the ability to view and show your pictures directly with no or commonly available accessoiry [Ipaq, Toshiba e310, etc.] or optionally SD-card when owning a PPC 2002 device [more expensive]
- metall body preferably to be able to take a punch
This gives at this moment as ultra compact alternatives for the Canon:
- Minolta Dimage X: also 2 Megapixel, extremely compact and light [wearable in shirtpocket], picture quality a bit less [I might have bought it today if I hadn't owned my Canon yet]. SD-cards still expensive
- Pentax Optio 330 or 430. About the same weight and size of the Canon, but 3 resp. 4 Megapixels and a bit more pricy. If you often want to print large pictures this is useful, however with my 2 megapixels I get satisfactory results at near A4/Letter size.
Hope this helps with your decision.
One extra tip:
Buy at least one extra battery and a large memory card [>128 MB]. You'll need them.