Windows Phone Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!


Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Android Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > WINDOWS PHONE THOUGHTS > Windows Phone Software

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-02-2002, 02:23 PM
marlof
Contributing Editor Emeritus
marlof's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,350
Default Storage Tools for Pocket PC

http://www.softwinter.com/storagetools.html

SoftWinter - known for the Sentry 2020 data encryption product - has announced its new product for storage cards, StorageTools.



With Storage Tools, you can get information on disk usage, fragmentation, FAT allocations, you can perform a verify and repair, format cards, and - if you opt for the payware version - defragment your cards.

The price depends on your usage for the product: Format and Scan functionality free for personal non-commercial use. Format, Scan and Defrag - US$14.95, includes lifetime free upgrades.
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-02-2002, 02:51 PM
Pony99CA
Swami
Pony99CA's Avatar
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,396

I have to wonder how much of a problem fragmentation is in RAM. On a disk, with head seek time and rotational delay, keeping files allocated neatly can really improve performance, both for reading and writing.

However, with electronic memory, reading probably won't be much slower. Writing to fragmented RAM would probably be a little slower if the operating system has to search a free list for available storage blocks, but it shouldn't be nearly as slow as writing to a disk. (By that, I mean relatively. I've heard claims that a Microdrive is faster than a CF card, but I mean that the Fragmented I/O Time to Non-Fragmented I/O time ratio is smaller for RAM than disk.)

Softwinter's Web page included a quotation saying that defragmenting could improve performance more than a hardware upgrade, but I wonder if that quotation referred to disks or PDAs. If it referred to disks, that quotation is out of context and very misleading, I think.

I welcome Softwinter to post performance statistics on fragmented vs. non-fragmented memory I/O.

Steve
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-02-2002, 04:21 PM
Shapeshifter
Pupil
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 22
Send a message via AIM to Shapeshifter Send a message via MSN to Shapeshifter

If you want a bit more than just flash card specs etc, I'd suggest you to try DEXplor, the most advanced file manager ever. Its cheaper too, and there is a free demo. It's worth a shot, trust me!
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-02-2002, 05:16 PM
Chubbergott
Ponderer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 85

I have read somewhere that defragging RAM does actually make a small difference (even though there are no heads - though Microdrive users will no longer have to use their PCMCIA card to defrag their drives with this). I had such a tool for my Psion5 & 5mx and used it quite regularly.

I think this price is quite reasonable as well!
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-02-2002, 05:45 PM
a.morreale
Neophyte
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9

Pony99CA makes a good point: solid-state devices have no moving parts so defragging CF, MMC, or SD cards doesn't give any real benefit. This applies both to reading and writing, as memory addressing is the same whatever the "logical cluster" involved (and free clusters can be found quickly through the FAT).

Reading or writing sector 1 and 2, or, instead, reading and writing sector 1 and 1000 doesn't make any difference on solid state devices, because memory addressing works exactly the same, while of course it does make a difference on mechanical devices such as MicroDrives.

The point is: would you defrag your 1GB or 5GB MicroDrive on your Pocket PC while on battery power?
I guess you wouldn't: and if you are at home or in the office, you would probably prefer to use your PC anyway, as this will also make the whole operation quite a lot shorter.
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-02-2002, 06:46 PM
Coordinator
Pupil
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 26

Defragmenting FAT on flash cards will improve performance.

When the file is fragmented, every read/write operation
requires jumping all over FAT table to locate which physical
cluster corresponds to the particular place in file.

After defragmentation FAT table contains single compressed
record for the file, and getting physical cluster is a fast, linear
operation.

The actual data read/write is indeed no faster on memory storage
as it is on disks.

But defragmentation is still worth it, because of the cluster lookup
speed improvement.
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-03-2002, 01:35 AM
dma1965
Thinker
dma1965's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 327
Default Not What I Expected

I downloaded this only for the defrag options, but after waiting for 2 hours to defrag my 128 meg SD card, I gave up. Too slow, and defrag is all I wanted. It takes minutes to pull the card out and defrag it on my laptop trhough my card reader. Oh well, nice try. The free format functions are cool though, for those that do not wish to shell out the $ for FlashFormat. 8O
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-04-2002, 12:21 AM
berzins
Pupil
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 20
Send a message via MSN to berzins
Default Uh oh!

Hi guys. Well I downloaded this application (Storage Works), and tried to do a format on my 128MB SD card. Well now I can't access it. I even donwloaded DEXplor to see if it could format the card and all I get is "Unable to open drive: \Storage Card\Vol: Error code: 5". Anyone have any ideas on how to fix this? I hope I did not hose the card. Any information would be great!

Dave...
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:19 PM.