Digital Home Thoughts

Digital Home Thoughts - News & Reviews for the Digital Home

Register in our forums so you're ready for our next giveaway contest...


Zune Thoughts

Loading feed...

Apple Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > DIGITAL HOME THOUGHTS > Digital Home News

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 07-11-2011, 09:00 PM
Hooch Tan
Contributing Editor
Hooch Tan's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 918
Send a message via ICQ to Hooch Tan Send a message via MSN to Hooch Tan Send a message via Yahoo to Hooch Tan
Default ISPs Agree to Serve Up Six Strikes

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...cement-plan.ars

"American Internet users, get ready for three strikes "six strikes." Major US Internet providers—including AT&T, Verizon, Comcast, Cablevision, and Time Warner Cable—have just signed on to a voluntary agreement with the movie and music businesses to crack down on online copyright infringers. But they will protect subscriber privacy and they won't filter or monitor their own networks for infringement. And after the sixth "strike," you won't necessarily be "out.""

The music and movie industry have had a love/hate relationship with the Internet.  Well, maybe mostly hate.  Since the Internets have come along, you would think that piracy is rampant and that the entertainment industry is in dire straits.  In response, there have been lots of attempts to protect their revenue stream, from Digital Rights Management, to lawsuits, to online services.  The latest effort to stem the tide sees a new partner, the ISP, act as a middleman.  ISPs have acted as a relay before, but not in this great capacity.  The measures seem much more reasonable than other attempts, like France's ill-fated "three-strikes" law, but I have worries that there is can be abuse and too open a system for mistakes.  That the alerts and violations can be audited by an independant reviewer goes a long way to mitigate that concern, that there is a filing fee seems unfair.  At least unless, if the reviewer finds the complaint issuer at fault, they are the ones to pay the fee.

 
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:53 AM.