Android Thoughts - Opinions, News, Advice & Reviews on Android Devices

Be sure to register in our forums! Share your opinions, help others, and enter our contests.


Apple Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > ANDROID THOUGHTS > Android Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-09-2011, 03:00 PM
Jon Westfall
Executive Editor, Android Thoughts
Jon Westfall's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,233
Default Motorola Needs To GTFO of The Android Ecosystem

<p><img src="http://images.thoughtsmedia.com//adt/auto/1299632969.usr7.png" /></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>That's right, I said it, Motorola needs to get the <em>frack</em>&nbsp;<em>out</em>&nbsp;of the Android Ecosystem. Adding another piece of fuel to the fire,&nbsp;Xavier Lanier over at Gotta Be Mobile discusses at length why <a href="http://www.gottabemobile.com/2011/03/08/why-im-returning-my-motorola-xoom">he's returning his Xoom</a>. I'd love to see us take it a step further, and return Motorola to their Razr glory days. Here's 3 reasons why.<MORE /></p><h2>1. Motorola doesn't respect users.</h2><p>So for many of us, we hadn't heard the term <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/201332/what_happens_when_you_hack_the_droid_x.html">eFuse until it was used in conjunction with Motorola's name</a>. The technology by Texas Instruments, if you don't know, basically can mean (at the worst) a power user who knowingly tries to hack their phone will brick it, voiding their warranty and losing hundreds of dollars all because someone doesn't like it's children to be tinkered with by their legal owners. While TI developed it, and it's debatable just how much Moto planned to use it, it's still a fact that it sent a strong message to the enthusiast community, namely, don't mess with this stuff! And even if you're not a hardcore ROM-slinging hacker, who wants to use an interface that has been described as <em><a href="http://gizmodo.com/#!5587225/motorola-droid-x-review" target="_blank">"ugly, scattershot, and confusing. It feels almost malicious."</a>&nbsp;</em>It's clear that Moto passes off subpar user experience as acceptable given the right hardware stats. I hate to tell them though - users are smart (in some case, smarter than your designers), and if we want to mod the thing we should be able to. To not allow this shows a fundamental disrespect for your user's opinions on how they want to use their device. And hey, we might actually make it more useful as we mod it!</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>2. Motorola introduces products too late, or too early.</h2><p>The Xoom is a classic case of Motorola rushing out the door with a product that's half done. You have to send it back to get a 4G update, the microSD card slot is inoperable at ship, and flash is nowhere to be seen. This isn't the first time Motorola has done this though - remember the Cliq? And what <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/10/14/motorola-cliq-review/" target="_blank">Engadget</a> had to say about it?</p><p><em>"In the bigger picture, though, we'd keep our wallets in our pockets for the time being -- the CLIQ looks and feels like a testbed, not quite ready for primetime but a genuinely heartening sign that Moto's still got a pulse."</em></p><p>And while the Droid was favorably reviewed, the Droid 2 was mostly a boring repeat that paled in comparison to the Droid X or Droid Incredible. And while the Droid X was arguably a sweet phone, reviews were largely <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/201666/motorola_droid_x_the_mixed_reviews_are_in.html" target="_blank">mixed</a> with Gizmodo calling the interface <a href="http://gizmodo.com/#!5587225/motorola-droid-x-review" target="_blank">"not-so-fresh"</a>. Motorola is hit or miss at best, early or late, and perplexing in their decisions, especially when it comes to what users can and can't do with a phone they bought (See point 1).</p><p>&nbsp;</p><h2>3. Motorola has no backbone with carriers and/or is clueless.</h2><p>This one is tricky to pin down, but I think the best example is the Xoom's proposed crippled WiFi. Basically until just a few days ago, it was announced that you needed to activate the device one time with Verizon to be able to connect it to the outside world. Want to just use the WiFi at home, never going to use Verizon's 3G/4G? Well that will still be $35 for activation and 1 month's data plan. Big V knows what's best for you - you need to use their network, and they'll force you into it! This is either Motorola bowing to Verizon's demands, or Motorola being so clueless that they feel users won't find this egregious. If you want everyone to use Verizon's service for 1 month so they can "try it and see if they like it", then build it into the price of the device and give me 1 month "free" as a trial. That would be fine, however it would add around $50-$75 onto a device that's already way too expensive. You're not the only game in town Motorola, you need to fight this to win it, not to just put out a mediocre device that users will be disappointed by. Thankfully they seem to have decided against this money grubbing tactic at the last minute and reversed course.&nbsp;</p><p>So there you have it, 3 really quick reasons why Motorola should just pack up their bags and go home. If they don't want to do that, I suggest they change their minds on a few things and get their heads "in the game". Otherwise, I shall not be wasting any more of my editorial time on their shoddy products (My other editors who are more partial to them may though!).</p><p><em>Jon Westfall is the Executive Editor of Android Thoughts, which means he can write whatever he wants short of libel. And he doesn't like Motorola products too much since about 2006. He might give them a second chance if they get this whole Xoom thing straightened out though.</em></p><p>&nbsp;</p>
__________________
Dr. Jon Westfall, MCSE, MS-MVP
Executive Editor - Android Thoughts
News Editor - Windows Phone Thoughts

 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-16-2011, 02:33 AM
Craig Horlacher
Contributing Editor
Craig Horlacher's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 524

I'm surprised there have been no replies to this and sad that mine is so late. I guess my main point would be nobody else is better than Motorola for the reasons below. It just comes down to personal preference and needs:

Samsung: Too slow getting out Froyo to their otherwise high end Galaxy S phones and GPS/location problems on all of them as well.

HTC: Poor battery life on the Evo 4G and the Dinc (first version with OLED). Small amount of built in main storage on these. OLED screens - use too much power and everyone is making apps and skins black because of them. Lousy first gen Snapdragon Adreno 200 GPU in the HTC phones of last year, including the Nexus One. It couldn't even keep up with the 3D performance of the original Droid.

So, for reasons listed above I'm very glad Motorola was around last year and made the Droid X which fits my tastes very nicely I also love the fact that Motorola uses 16x9 displays. I take photo's and video in 16x9 and now they display perfectly on all the devices I use: psp, ps3/protector, tv, laptop, and Droid X. Sure, it's not a huge deal but it sure is nice when you have it
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-16-2011, 04:12 AM
Lee Yuan Sheng
Contributing Editor
Lee Yuan Sheng's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,503

For me, as long as there are hackers working on the device, that's good enough for me. Corollary to that, it means said device needs to be hackable. So, no Motorola for me. In fact, after getting my thigh burnt one too many times, no Motorola for me anyway. :P
__________________
Baka. Soku. Zan. - The justice behind the dysORDer.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:20 AM.