Should Microsoft Started Smaller?

		Thoughts Media Forums > ZUNE THOUGHTS > Zune Talk
Should Microsoft Started Smaller?

12-01-2006, 05:30 AM

Aaron Roma Editor Emeritus Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 316		Should Microsoft Started Smaller? <div class='os_post_top_link'><a href='http://daringfireball.net/2006/11/did_microsoft_copy_the_wrong_ipod' target='_blank'>http://daringfireball.net/2006/11/did_microsoft_copy_the_wrong_ipod</a><br /><br /></div><p><em>"Looking both at these Amazon rankings and the iPods I see people using out on the street on a daily basis, I can’t help but think that Microsoft copied the wrong iPod. The Nano is the sweet spot for Apple, and it’s the Nano-ish players from competitors that are registering in the sales charts."</em> </p><p> </p><p>This article from Daring Fireball brings up a good point.  The top of Amazon's Bestsellers list for <a target="_blank" href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/electronics/172630/ref=pd_ts_e_nav/105-5712797-2551625">MP3 Players</a> is dominated by the smaller flash based players such as the Nano and Sansa with a scattering of larger hard-drive based units. Considering Microsoft's decision to enter the market with only one model, was the 30GB level the right choice? Would Microsoft have been better served by first introducing a Nano competitor? Do you think the first model introduced was a conscience decision on the part of the Zune team, or was it a matter of facilitating the launch by reusing the basic design of the Gigabeat?</p>

12-01-2006, 09:02 AM

LPD Ponderer Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 81		Second guessing the model type and feature set is pointless unless you are privy to all the marketing studies, pricing data, and manufacturing realities. Product development exists in the imperfect real world. At some point you stop crunching the spreadsheets, make decisions, and commit to a product. You can tweek it somewhat as you go but you never get it out the door with scope creep and indecision. No significant product is ever perfect. This discussion turns into pure speculation immediately unless you have all the facts. I really like my Zune and I'm glad I didn't have to wait several more months for it.

12-01-2006, 11:57 AM

Sage Ponderer Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 52		I disagree with the article - I think Microsoft did the right thing by starting with the top model in the range. This first generation of Zune is obviously designed to test the water and encourage feedback before The Big Push. A large HD-based model will appeal the knowledgable technophiles (i.e. geeks! ) and I'm sure that they will be able to give Microsoft lots of pointers on how to perfect the experience for later releases. Less experienced users tend to go for the smaller players and won't put up with having to hack their registry in order to get features to work. Imagine the backlash and negative press Microsoft could have received if they targetted the mainstream straight away. Zune isn't ready for the big time. Give it a few generations and then Microsoft can take an aim at the market leader.

12-01-2006, 03:03 PM

David Tucker Contributing Editor Emeritus Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 1,053		I think also, given that MS wants to push the Zune Pass, that a HDD player is more suited for that.

12-01-2006, 06:31 PM

Aaron Roma

Editor Emeritus

Join Date: Aug 2006

Posts: 316

Quote:

Originally Posted by Codefox

I think also, given that MS wants to push the Zune Pass, that a HDD player is more suited for that.

You know, that's a pretty good point.

12-02-2006, 12:52 AM

jdmountford Ponderer Join Date: Sep 2006 Posts: 58		I think for what Microsoft wanted the HDD model was right for where they are going, but not right for the world(or U.S.) at large. What device sells? It isn't even the iPod Video. It is their small units. Things people can carry with them. The average person does not want to deal with Video conversion or any of that. Just dump their music on the device on go for a run. That's it!! Portability for music is where the MAJORITY of users are at. So I QUARANTEE that if MS had launched a Nano competitor I would not be sitting around waiting for all the bugs to get out. My wife would have a "Zuni" in her stocking. At the same time hardware will not take a lot to get right. And I think once we move past the production level prototype that is the current Zune we will see things take off. If I were MS I would have wanted to get the Software right before launching a Mass market device and having many, many grumbly people. With the HDD device they have time, as mostly you are just getting purchases from Early adaptors, to get things right. I definitively think Apple has a struggle on their hands, but right now it is just a small itch. MS really goes at things for the long haul. <O

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Microsoft Research AURA - Barcode Reader that Finds Product Information on the Web	Kris Kumar	Windows Phone Software	25	04-25-2008 12:38 PM
GigaOM: Hey Microsoft, Forget MIX, Focus on Mobiles	Kris Kumar	Windows Phone Talk	1	05-08-2007 02:40 AM
Microsoft and Their History of Hardware Design	Jason Dunn	Zune Talk	1	09-14-2006 05:35 PM
Steve Ballmer's Thoughts on What will Move the Microsoft Stock	Kris Kumar	Windows Phone Talk	7	04-03-2006 03:34 AM
Microsoft Building iPod and PSP Killer?	Jason Dunn	Digital Home News	4	03-24-2006 08:16 PM

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:54 PM.

Zune Thoughts.com