03-11-2005, 04:00 AM
|
|
Editor Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,981
|
|
Man Dies Typing SMS Message While Driving
"A Tennessee man who was typing a text message on his cell phone as he traveled south on Interstate 65 died when he lost control of his pickup, which overturned as it went down an embankment, authorities said."
:twak: Come on people, put the phone down while driving! For that matter, put down the cheeseburger, pop, coffee, newspaper, or whatever it is you're doing, and focus on the road. :evil: Thankfully, no one else was hurt in this accident.
__________________
"I have no special talents, I am only passionately curious" - Albert Einstein |
| |
|
|
|
03-11-2005, 05:28 AM
|
|
Intellectual
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 118
|
|
Okay, I have to admit I check my email when stopped at red lights, but the second that light turns, the phone goes back on the seat next to me. Although I have a friend who was messaging me on his Blackberry on a trip up to Baltimore from Georgia and he was doing 85 on the highway.
Some people have strong constitutions, I guess.
|
| |
|
|
|
03-11-2005, 07:45 AM
|
|
Developer & Designer, News Editor Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,959
|
|
Disappointing. 
We've had many cases of "SMS while driving" related deaths in WA, not to mention the number of "phone calling while driving" related deaths too.
It's got to the point where in WA, you are now forbidden to use your phone whilst driving, unless you have your phone connected to a hands-free or on loudspeaker. There aren't any laws here governing SMSing whilst driving though, but that would be too hard to monitor anyway.
|
| |
|
|
|
03-11-2005, 10:05 AM
|
|
Editor Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,305
|
|
This is about Darwinism folks. These things happen to keep the gene pool clean.
|
| |
|
|
|
03-11-2005, 10:16 AM
|
|
Ponderer
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 56
|
|
In the UK it's illegal to hold a mobile phone whilst using it for any voice or data services. "Even" holding the phone against your ear with your shoulder counts as holding it. Handsfree kit or nothing basically.
With voice control functions you could still legally (if not safely) drive and dictate messages, have emails read to you etc.
But are we *really* that busy? Or is it just selfishness and "it wont happen to me" mentalities.
This is the only area where I think mobiles actually have an adverse effect on our lives (I don't buy into the cancer/mutation/brain damage scares about antenna masts)
|
| |
|
|
|
03-11-2005, 11:59 AM
|
|
Editor Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,981
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by chucky.egg
But are we *really* that busy? Or is it just selfishness and "it wont happen to me" mentalities.
|
Good point, I think this is a big part of it.
__________________
"I have no special talents, I am only passionately curious" - Albert Einstein |
| |
|
|
|
03-11-2005, 01:09 PM
|
|
Intellectual
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 144
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jerry Raia
This is about Darwinism folks. These things happen to keep the gene pool clean.
|
I love it. Spoken like a true Taltos Lasher 8)
|
| |
|
|
|
03-11-2005, 02:01 PM
|
|
Swami
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,303
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mike Temporale
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by chucky.egg
But are we *really* that busy? Or is it just selfishness and "it wont happen to me" mentalities.
|
Good point, I think this is a big part of it. |
Bingo. It's "the law applies to everyome else but me" syndrome. :? It's seen across so many areas of life.
|
| |
|
|
|
03-11-2005, 03:29 PM
|
|
Pupil
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 25
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by chucky.egg
In the UK it's illegal to hold a mobile phone whilst using it for any voice or data services. "Even" holding the phone against your ear with your shoulder counts as holding it. Handsfree kit or nothing basically.
|
A while back they tried to pass a similar law in Rhode Island but the governor at the time vetoed it. His reasoning was people can do a lot of dangerous things while driving why pass a law to single out phones? He didn't argue that phone use while driving is demonstrably dangerous but "Hey! we can do other dangerous, distracting things while driving also, might as well let them use phones also." That was a line of reasoning that totally escaped me. Sure people do a lot of dangerous things while driving, shaving, reading the newspaper, putting on makeup and those things should be illegal also, but IMHO making one less thing legal for people to do while driving is at least a start.
__________________
"I am not a number, I am a free man!" - Number 6
|
| |
|
|
|
03-11-2005, 03:57 PM
|
|
Editor Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 10,981
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Number 6
A while back they tried to pass a similar law in Rhode Island but the governor at the time vetoed it. His reasoning was people can do a lot of dangerous things while driving why pass a law to single out phones? He didn't argue that phone use while driving is demonstrably dangerous but "Hey! we can do other dangerous, distracting things while driving also, might as well let them use phones also." That was a line of reasoning that totally escaped me. Sure people do a lot of dangerous things while driving, shaving, reading the newspaper, putting on makeup and those things should be illegal also, but IMHO making one less thing legal for people to do while driving is at least a start.
|
I would agree with him. A law to fight 1 of many issues is a waste of everyone's time. A better law should be drafted saying "doing ANYTHING while driving is illegal." Focusing on 1 issue may stop or slow the number of people doing that, but it does nothing to the thousands of cheesburger totting, newspaper reading, make-up applying people out there. You can't draft a law for each and every one of these activities. Something more general has to be passed. 
__________________
"I have no special talents, I am only passionately curious" - Albert Einstein |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
Similar Threads