02-18-2004, 10:06 PM
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 589
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pmradio
Quote:
Originally Posted by adwignall
Oh, and Yahoo uses the Google search appliances, so you're just using a different implementation of Google. But chances are you knew that. :mrgreen:
|
If he didn't, he could always google it and find out! :rotfl:
|
I think he'd still Yahoo it via Googleing it.
And am I the only one not looking forward to a Google's IPO?
|
|
|
|
|
02-18-2004, 10:12 PM
|
Editor Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,221
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by adwignall
I think he'd still Yahoo it via Googleing it.
|
So, would that be Yagoogling it?
Just curious why you're down on the IPO? Just wondering what the negative effects on Google might be?
|
|
|
|
|
02-18-2004, 10:17 PM
|
Thinker
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 439
|
|
Would you please congigate that verb for us?
I Google(tm).
You Google(tm).
He/She/It Google(tm)s.
I will have been Google(tm)ing.
So what ever happened to number googol? I'd like to sue Google(tm) for impinging on my understanding of this very large number. I have been emotionally traumatized!
Is there a laywer in the house?
Robb
|
|
|
|
|
02-18-2004, 10:25 PM
|
Editor Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,221
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robb Bates
I Google(tm).
You Google(tm).
He/She/It Google(tm)s.
I will have been Google(tm)ing.
|
I sure hope the (tm) is silent! :lol:
|
|
|
|
|
02-18-2004, 10:30 PM
|
Thinker
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 439
|
|
Well, of course not! We wouldn't want to deprive Google(tm) of their well deserved success and aknowledge their claim to the word Google(tm). :roll:
But when you say the (tm) you have to say it quietly to the side. :lol:
Robb
|
|
|
|
|
02-18-2004, 10:37 PM
|
Editor Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 15,171
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by adwignall
And am I the only one not looking forward to a Google's IPO?
|
AFAIK, Google's IPO is on hold, so don't worry too much about it.
--janak
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|