Reid Kistler
04-28-2010, 01:30 AM
<div class='os_post_top_link'><a href='http://www.mnfamilylawblog.com/2010/04/articles/property-division/difficult-division-of-family-photos-challenging-polaroids-pronto/' target='_blank'>http://www.mnfamilylawblog.com/2010...laroids-pronto/</a><br /><br /></div><p><em>"When M.R. and E.R. decided to call it quits after more than 20 years of marriage, they had no trouble agreeing on how to split the marital home or how to handle custody of their children. But when it came to figuring out how to divide more than 7,000 photographs, the picture got blurrier."</em></p><p><img src="http://images.thoughtsmedia.com/resizer/thumbs/size/600/dht/auto/1272413570.usr19541.jpg" style="border: 1px solid #d2d2bb;" /></p><p>Jake Ludington (<a href="http://www.mediablab.com" target="_blank">Mediablab.com</a>) sent along a link to the above story (which, in turn, draws from an article taken from the<a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202447983610&rss=newswire" target="_blank"> New York Law Journel</a>), and, at first, my thought was "Gee, that is sad - but how does this story apply to 'Digital Home Thoughts?'" Of course, upon reflection, the situation presented poses several questions to ponder for those of us with an interest in photography, and particularly those who are also either married or in some other long-term relationship: 1) How difficult would it be for you to part with a significant portion of the photographic prints you have taken over the years? 2) If asked for advice, what method(s) would you recommend for duplicating photographic prints, notably Polaroids or other prints that lack negatives? And, 3) Given the rise of digital cameras, is this scenario one that is only likely to happen with people above a certain age (and what would that age be, approximately?), or has the recent increase in popularity of "instant prints" resulted in more hard copy only prints?</p><p> </p><p><em></em></p>