Hooch Tan
04-20-2010, 01:30 AM
<div class='os_post_top_link'><a href='http://conecti.ca/2010/04/15/mini-review™-hp-slate-pc-ipad-no-tiembla-ni-de-frio/comment-page-1/' target='_blank'>http://conecti.ca/2010/04/15/mini-r...comment-page-1/</a><br /><br /></div><p><em>"Each develops a gadget that Apple does not spare those who come after announcing that they have a replacement. Just as there are a lot of iPod Killers (still waiting) and iPhone Killers (Hello?), now has been the range of IPAD Killers. Case to light, the HP Slate. We had a short in our hands."</em></p><p><img src="http://images.thoughtsmedia.com/resizer/thumbs/size/600/dht/auto/1271719978.usr20447.jpg" style="border: 1px solid #d2d2bb;" /></p><p>The review, in Spanish (translation through Google <a href="http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=es&tl=en&u=http://conecti.ca/2010/04/15/mini-review%E2%84%A2-hp-slate-pc-ipad-no-tiembla-ni-de-frio/comment-page-1/" target="_blank">here</a>), looks at a pre-production HP Slate, so I would take some of the comments with a grain of salt. The one thing I do take away from it is that HP seems to have considered the Slate a netbook sans keyboard, which I believe to be a mistake. It seems that after years of tablets, both convertibles and slates, manufacturers should be aware that a different interface is what is needed, and this is where competition against the iPad needs to be made. I am reminded of the lesson that Microsoft learned with Windows CE and then the PocketPC OS/Windows Mobile. When Microsoft first came out with Windows CE, they mirrored the Windows 95 interface which failed horribly. Then they tried what is seen up to Windows Mobile 6 which still has its limitations. The form factor dictates a different interface. As it stands, it looks like the HP Slate will be a disappointment. Anyone still interested in getting one?</p>