Jason Dunn
09-24-2009, 05:30 PM
<p><img src="http://images.thoughtsmedia.com//dht/auto/1253807886.usr1.png" style="border: 0; float: left; margin: 10px;" />I'm slowly but surely migrating my computers from Windows Vista to Windows 7, and one of the things that is impressing me more and more as I use it is the expanded video codec support. With Windows Vista, one of the first programs I'd install would be <a href="http://www.videolan.org/vlc/" target="_blank">VLC Media Player</a> because Vista was incapable of playing pretty much anything but WMV and AVI files. With Windows 7, I chose not to install it because I wanted to see how good the new MPEG4/h.264 support was. In a word? Great! Going through my archive of old video files, which are in a variety of formats (AVI, WMV, h.264/MPEG4, AVI Divx), it looks like the only videos that won't play with Windows Media Player are some old-school Quicktime MOV files. No big loss there.</p><p>On to today's task: I had downloaded a video in XVID format and I wanted to burn it to a DVD for my wife to watch. The first thing that impressed me was that Windows Media Player 12 on Windows 7 was able to play this XVID file just as easily as it would play a WMV file. That's exactly how it's supposed to work. We should have had support like this in Vista, but Microsoft didn't seem to want to invest in the codecs - thankfully that has changed with Windows 7. Taking this XVID file, I loaded it into Windows DVD Maker, and it burned a DVD. That sort of smooth "A to B" task has sometimes been difficult on previous versions of Windows, so I'm impressed that Windows 7 finally gets it right. <MORE /></p><p>I'm less impressed with Windows DVD Maker itself though. First, it barely used more than 20% of my Core i920 CPU (four cores, eight threads) when doing the transcode from XVID to MPEG2. Of all the applications on Windows 7 that you want to be multi-core smart, Windows DVD Maker should be at the top of that list. Second, even though the XVID file was a 16:9 aspect ratio file, Windows DVD Maker created a 4:3 disc, regardless of whether or not I had it set to 16:9 or 4:3. I'm not sure why it was so dysfunctional - I'll have to test it with another video file.</p><p>So while Windows DVD Maker looks like it needs some work, the expanded codec support in Windows 7 rocks. Good job Microsoft!</p>