Jason Dunn
07-07-2009, 10:00 PM
<div class='os_post_top_link'><a href='http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=1145&tag=nl.e539' target='_blank'>http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=1145&tag=nl.e539</a><br /><br /></div><p><em>"Thanks to a tip from Kristan Kenney, I took a close look at the agreements embedded in the License folder of the latest leaked builds of Windows 7. This is no longer a beta license agreement and is presumably very close to the final agreement that customers will accept. The agreements for retail copies of Windows 7 Home Premium contain this eye-opening clause..."</em></p><p><span><img src="http://images.thoughtsmedia.com//dht/auto/1246985101.usr1.png" style="border: 1px solid #d2d2bb;" /></span></p><p>This news is a few days old, but I thought it was worth sharing for those who hadn't heard about it yet: it looks like Microsoft is gearing up to offer a three-pack license of Windows 7 for home users. If this news is accurate, and pricing is reasonable ($199 or less) this is a significant moment for Microsoft. I've been harping on this issue of family pack licensing for years, and I've never seen a glimmer that Microsoft actually understood why this was important. The millions of "newish" computers out there still running Windows XP instead of Vista is a testament to not only the bad public perception, but also the sheer cost of upgrading multiple computers in a household. Especially now that Vista-era machines can easily run Windows 7, the issue of whether or not people will upgrade becomes a criticial one. Microsoft needs to make this work.</p>