Vincent Ferrari
06-15-2009, 05:00 PM
<div class='os_post_top_link'><a href='http://www.macrumors.com/c.php?u=http://www.att.com/Common/merger/files/pdf/iPhone/Customers_FAQs.pdf&t=1245061801' target='_blank'>http://www.macrumors.com/c.php?u=ht...df&t=1245061801</a><br /><br /></div><p><img src="http://images.thoughtsmedia.com/resizer/thumbs/size/600/at/auto/1245062668.usr18053.jpg" style="border: 1px solid #d2d2bb;" /></p><p>Well, this is somewhat interesting news... Many of us assumed that AT&T was going to end up charging for MMS whenever it did get around to making it available for the iPhone (after all, it's not like AT&T has any other devices that do MMS so the delay is totally understandable), but according to <a href="http://www.macrumors.com/c.php?u=http://www.att.com/Common/merger/files/pdf/iPhone/Customers_FAQs.pdf&t=1245061801" target="_blank">AT&T's own documents</a>, if you have a text messaging bundle, you'll have MMS when the time comes.</p><p>Sounds good to me, now can we get our collective butts moving on it, already? Honestly making iPhone users wait for MMS when the rest of the network has phones that (as AT&T brags about) are MMS enabled already is just flat out dumb.</p>