Jeff Campbell
05-12-2009, 04:00 PM
<div class='os_post_top_link'><a href='http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2009/05/psystar-compelled-to-provide-apple-detailed-financial-docs.ars' target='_blank'>http://arstechnica.com/apple/news/2...ancial-docs.ars</a><br /><br /></div><p><em>"After failing to provide detailed information about its money trail, Judge Alsup has given Psystar 10 days to produce the documents or face sanctions from the court. Psystar insists that it's a tiny company that has had trouble producing these documents, however."</em></p><p><img src="http://images.thoughtsmedia.com/resizer/thumbs/size/600/at/auto/1242120480.usr105634.jpg" /></p><p>This came after the discovery phase of the trial when certain documents just weren't being provided by Psystar. So the judge gave them a deadline in which they had to comply, after listening to excuses such as <em>"we have a high turnover"</em>, <em>"we just moved",</em> <em>"we are a small company"</em> and so on. I have to admit that if I was the judge, I'd get pretty tired of the excuses, so this kind of activity doesn't look good for Psystar. Adding insult to injury, the CEO Rudy Pedraza couldn't even give the basic financial information about his own company. </p>